Hi. In the last week we started to use Lively's trac again. There, we keep track of existing issues, feature requests and necessary refactorings. Besides trac we also use Lively itself for issue reports. Whenever there's a bug that's description isn't absolutely trivial, it's a great help to have a small example in Lively for the issue. Such issue pages are usual Lively worlds and, therefore, can contain any morphs and texts that help to understand and reproduce issues. Examples: http://lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/issues/111017_StaticBindingOfSuperInClosures.xhtml, http://lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/issues/111026_CustomFormattedBinsInPartsBin.xhtml We create such issue worlds from a template: http://lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/issues/CreateIssuePage.xhtml. Please feel free to contribute! Best, Lauritz _______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel |
Hi.
Our trac instance and Lively's issues folder have been fairly active; and Lively Kernel as well: we fixed a couple of critical issues in the last week! Our ideas on using trac and Lively can be found here: http://www.lively-kernel.org/repository/webwerkstatt/projects/LivelyKernel/process.xhtml Any feedback? :-) Best, Lauritz On Nov 4, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Lauritz Thamsen wrote:
_______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel |
Hi, Lauritz
thanks for putting it together. I think it pretty much describes the process how it worked since we use trac. We should add some information how you can get the revision number that fixed the bug, e.g. version info of the module. I really long for something like CodeDB so that we can get change messages in our code again as we have now for the Parts. Best, Jens PS: The colors are so squeaky :-) On 11.11.2011, at 00:38, Lauritz Thamsen wrote:
_______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel |
Hi Jens.
Thanks for your feedback!
I think it's okay to just save the head revision number after fixing a bug - with auto-commit and without commit messages, most fixes aren't a single commit anyway. I added some description to the process world and another morph to the issue template - it lets you conveniently save the current head revision on the issue page. And I absolutely agree that we do need meaningful commits and messages soon...so looking forward to CodeDB! :-) Best, Lauritz Feel free to change... ;-) On Nov 11, 2011, at 2:12 AM, Jens Lincke wrote:
_______________________________________________ lively-kernel mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/listinfo/lively-kernel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |