Looks reasonable and cheap.
I will work on the canalyzer in a couple of weeks.
Alexandre
On 9 Sep 2011, at 10:55, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In C/C++ you can define something like this:
> typedef Type TypeAlias;
>
> To be able to model this in FAMIX, I introduced FAMIXTypeAlias in Famix-C. However, now I think we have to move it to the Core because of the following reason.
>
> Suppose we have something like this:
> typedef Type TypeAlias;
> SubType: TypeAlias
>
> When enumerating the subclasses of Type, I need to get:
> - TypeAlias
> - SubType
>
> To do this, when traversing with subclassesDo: I need to take into account the typeAliases associated with each type. This means that the notion of TypeAliases must be in the Core.
>
> I hope I explained the matter. Please let me know if you see other alternatives.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Locked
