An uncommon situation but it exposes something that would be nice to correct anyhow...
If interCyclePause is commented out like...
WorldState >>doOneCycleFor: aWorld
"self interCyclePause: MinCycleLapse."
self doOneCycleNowFor: aWorld.
in Process Browser there is a build-up of unnamed priority 31 processes.
I haven't been able to track down where these arise from
to work out what their name should be.
Anyone who contributed code which creates forks a new process,
could you check if this is the source and provide a name?
cheers -ben
P.S. I wonder if the default name of forked processes should be something like "thisContext sender receiver"
Locked
