[update 1.1] #11255
Locked
 
|
11255
----- - added tests for the compiler to test shadowing of self, super, thisContext, true, false and nil. Thanks guys - we know you :) - Issue 2086: Introduce a cleanUp/cleanUp: protocol from squeak / keith idea! MyClass class>>cleanUp: aggressive This (class-side) method is called with an argument that indicates whether to do aggressive, i.e., potentially destructive cleanup. Doing aggressive cleanup will delete projects, change sets, uni-classes and more. Gentle cleanup is expected to only flush transient caches. If your class only has gentle cleanup you can simply implement MyClass class>>cleanUp By default #cleanUp: delegates to this method (similar to startUp/startUp: and shutDown/shutDown:). You can run cleanup by executing: Smalltalk cleanUp. Smalltalk cleanUp: true. Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good for my brain :) Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: [update 1.1] #11255
|
|
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: 11255 It seems there is a problem as cleanUp or cleanUp: are implemented in SmalltalkImage but not in SystemDictionary...so evaluating Smalltalk cleanUp. Smalltalk cleanUp: true. gives a DNU. Another question....wouldn't be a good idea to add at least a "Smalltalk cleanUp. " in ScriptLoader >> cleanUpForRelease ??? or similar.... Cheers Mraiano Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good for my brain :) _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
2010/3/9 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>:
> > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> 11255 >> ----- >> >> - added tests for the compiler to test shadowing of self, super, >> thisContext, true, false and nil. Thanks guys - we know you :) >> >> - Issue 2086: Introduce a cleanUp/cleanUp: protocol from squeak / keith >> idea! >> MyClass class>>cleanUp: aggressive >> This (class-side) method is called with an argument that indicates >> whether to do aggressive, i.e., potentially destructive cleanup. Doing >> aggressive cleanup will delete projects, change sets, uni-classes and more. >> Gentle cleanup is expected to only flush transient caches. If your class >> only has gentle cleanup you can simply implement >> >> MyClass class>>cleanUp >> >> By default #cleanUp: delegates to this method (similar to startUp/startUp: >> and shutDown/shutDown:). You can >> run cleanup by executing: >> >> Smalltalk cleanUp. >> Smalltalk cleanUp: true. >> > > It seems there is a problem as cleanUp or cleanUp: are implemented in > SmalltalkImage but not in SystemDictionary...so evaluating > > Smalltalk cleanUp. > Smalltalk cleanUp: true. > > gives a DNU. > Yep, in trunk Smalltalk class = SmalltalkImage, so it just works Maybe pharo want this change too ? Nicolas > Another question....wouldn't be a good idea to add at least a "Smalltalk > cleanUp. " in ScriptLoader >> cleanUpForRelease ??? or similar.... > > Cheers > > Mraiano > > > >> >> Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good >> for my brain :) >> >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
On 10 March 2010 00:58, Nicolas Cellier
<[hidden email]> wrote: > 2010/3/9 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>: >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> 11255 >>> ----- >>> >>> - added tests for the compiler to test shadowing of self, super, >>> thisContext, true, false and nil. Thanks guys - we know you :) >>> >>> - Issue 2086: Introduce a cleanUp/cleanUp: protocol from squeak / keith >>> idea! >>> MyClass class>>cleanUp: aggressive >>> This (class-side) method is called with an argument that indicates >>> whether to do aggressive, i.e., potentially destructive cleanup. Doing >>> aggressive cleanup will delete projects, change sets, uni-classes and more. >>> Gentle cleanup is expected to only flush transient caches. If your class >>> only has gentle cleanup you can simply implement >>> >>> MyClass class>>cleanUp >>> >>> By default #cleanUp: delegates to this method (similar to startUp/startUp: >>> and shutDown/shutDown:). You can >>> run cleanup by executing: >>> >>> Smalltalk cleanUp. >>> Smalltalk cleanUp: true. >>> >> >> It seems there is a problem as cleanUp or cleanUp: are implemented in >> SmalltalkImage but not in SystemDictionary...so evaluating >> >> Smalltalk cleanUp. >> Smalltalk cleanUp: true. >> >> gives a DNU. >> > > Yep, in trunk Smalltalk class = SmalltalkImage, so it just works > Maybe pharo want this change too ? > I think this would be great. > Nicolas > >> Another question....wouldn't be a good idea to add at least a "Smalltalk >> cleanUp. " in ScriptLoader >> cleanUpForRelease ??? or similar.... >> >> Cheers >> >> Mraiano >> >> >> >>> >>> Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good >>> for my brain :) >>> >>> >>> Stef >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
El mar, 09-03-2010 a las 22:40 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
> 11255 > ----- > > - added tests for the compiler to test shadowing of self, super, thisContext, true, false and nil. Thanks guys - we know you :) > > - Issue 2086: Introduce a cleanUp/cleanUp: protocol from squeak / keith idea! > MyClass class>>cleanUp: aggressive > This (class-side) method is called with an argument that indicates whether to do aggressive, i.e., potentially destructive cleanup. Doing aggressive cleanup will delete projects, change sets, uni-classes and more. Gentle cleanup is expected to only flush transient caches. If your class only has gentle cleanup you can simply implement > > MyClass class>>cleanUp > > By default #cleanUp: delegates to this method (similar to startUp/startUp: and shutDown/shutDown:). You can > run cleanup by executing: > > Smalltalk cleanUp. > Smalltalk cleanUp: true. > > Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good for my brain :) > Cool, very good. Good to see this implemented at least. Can we then close: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1778 as it appears to me that this solves it. Cheers -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
This is on purpose :)
We plan to have Smalltalk -> SmalltalkImage current soon (after all the years I have been waiting for it to happen this is good to see it happening in squeak It was not top priority for pharo but on the huge todo so now we will do it). Stef > MyClass class>>cleanUp: aggressive > This (class-side) method is called with an argument that indicates whether to do aggressive, i.e., potentially destructive cleanup. Doing aggressive cleanup will delete projects, change sets, uni-classes and more. Gentle cleanup is expected to only flush transient caches. If your class only has gentle cleanup you can simply implement > > MyClass class>>cleanUp > > By default #cleanUp: delegates to this method (similar to startUp/startUp: and shutDown/shutDown:). You can > run cleanup by executing: > > Smalltalk cleanUp. > Smalltalk cleanUp: true. > > > It seems there is a problem as cleanUp or cleanUp: are implemented in SmalltalkImage but not in SystemDictionary...so evaluating > > Smalltalk cleanUp. > Smalltalk cleanUp: true. > > gives a DNU. > > Another question....wouldn't be a good idea to add at least a "Smalltalk cleanUp. " in ScriptLoader >> cleanUpForRelease ??? or similar.... > > Cheers > > Mraiano > > > > Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good for my brain :) > > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Miguel Cobá
yeap! Closed. This was since september that this was on my todo.
Miguel I added you as project committers On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:53 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote: > El mar, 09-03-2010 a las 22:40 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió: >> 11255 >> ----- >> >> - added tests for the compiler to test shadowing of self, super, thisContext, true, false and nil. Thanks guys - we know you :) >> >> - Issue 2086: Introduce a cleanUp/cleanUp: protocol from squeak / keith idea! >> MyClass class>>cleanUp: aggressive >> This (class-side) method is called with an argument that indicates whether to do aggressive, i.e., potentially destructive cleanup. Doing aggressive cleanup will delete projects, change sets, uni-classes and more. Gentle cleanup is expected to only flush transient caches. If your class only has gentle cleanup you can simply implement >> >> MyClass class>>cleanUp >> >> By default #cleanUp: delegates to this method (similar to startUp/startUp: and shutDown/shutDown:). You can >> run cleanup by executing: >> >> Smalltalk cleanUp. >> Smalltalk cleanUp: true. >> >> Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good for my brain :) >> > > Cool, very good. Good to see this implemented at least. > Can we then close: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1778 > > as it appears to me that this solves it. > > Cheers > -- > Miguel Cobá > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
>> It seems there is a problem as cleanUp or cleanUp: are implemented in
> SmalltalkImage but not in SystemDictionary...so evaluating > > Smalltalk cleanUp. > Smalltalk cleanUp: true. > > gives a DNU. > > Another question....wouldn't be a good idea to add at least a "Smalltalk > cleanUp. " in ScriptLoader >> cleanUpForRelease ??? or similar.... Yes. And when we adopt the cleanUp protocol, the stuff in cleanUpForRelease should be moved into the appropriate classes. Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Re: [update 1.1] #11255
|
|
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
El mié, 10-03-2010 a las 08:41 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
> yeap! Closed. This was since september that this was on my todo. > > Miguel I added you as project committers Thanks :) > > > On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:53 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote: > > > El mar, 09-03-2010 a las 22:40 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió: > >> 11255 > >> ----- > >> > >> - added tests for the compiler to test shadowing of self, super, thisContext, true, false and nil. Thanks guys - we know you :) > >> > >> - Issue 2086: Introduce a cleanUp/cleanUp: protocol from squeak / keith idea! > >> MyClass class>>cleanUp: aggressive > >> This (class-side) method is called with an argument that indicates whether to do aggressive, i.e., potentially destructive cleanup. Doing aggressive cleanup will delete projects, change sets, uni-classes and more. Gentle cleanup is expected to only flush transient caches. If your class only has gentle cleanup you can simply implement > >> > >> MyClass class>>cleanUp > >> > >> By default #cleanUp: delegates to this method (similar to startUp/startUp: and shutDown/shutDown:). You can > >> run cleanup by executing: > >> > >> Smalltalk cleanUp. > >> Smalltalk cleanUp: true. > >> > >> Thanks luc for your analysis. After lunch in hot room is never that good for my brain :) > >> > > > > Cool, very good. Good to see this implemented at least. > > Can we then close: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1778 > > > > as it appears to me that this solves it. > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Miguel Cobá > > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [hidden email] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |