30003
----- 10046 Spec new version https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10046 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Layout-EstebanLorenzano.29 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Core-EstebanLorenzano.90 |
Does it make sense to make updates when we have no working infrastructure? :-)
-- Pavel On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > 30003 > ----- > > 10046 Spec new version > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10046 > > Diff information: > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Layout-EstebanLorenzano.29 > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Core-EstebanLorenzano.90 > > |
infrastructure is working :)
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > Does it make sense to make updates when we have no working infrastructure? :-) > > -- Pavel > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >> 30003 >> ----- >> >> 10046 Spec new version >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10046 >> >> Diff information: >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Layout-EstebanLorenzano.29 >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Core-EstebanLorenzano.90 >> >> > |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
> infrastructure is working :) > And it is hard to get it to work without doing an update at the same time... > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Does it make sense to make updates when we have no working infrastructure? :-) >> >> -- Pavel >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> 30003 >>> ----- >>> >>> 10046 Spec new version >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10046 >>> >>> Diff information: >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Layout-EstebanLorenzano.29 >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Core-EstebanLorenzano.90 >>> >>> >> > > -- -- Marcus Denker -- [hidden email] http://www.marcusdenker.de |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
So where is the Pharo3.0 jenkins job ? :)
Ben On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: infrastructure is working :) |
On 19 mars 2013, at 12:54, Benjamin wrote:
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
cool, sorry :-)
-- Pavel On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > infrastructure is working :) > > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Does it make sense to make updates when we have no working infrastructure? :-) >> >> -- Pavel >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> 30003 >>> ----- >>> >>> 10046 Spec new version >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10046 >>> >>> Diff information: >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Layout-EstebanLorenzano.29 >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Core-EstebanLorenzano.90 >>> >>> >> > > |
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > cool, sorry :-) > What is missing: -> The bug tracker UI that allows to link to and view bugs without being logged in (and request a login via the web interface) -> Fugbugz needs some more configuration (e.g. issue states) -> Monkey needs to be ported to use fugbugz But it looks already quite good. Marcus |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
CurrentMajorVersionNumber in ScriptLoader class >>initialize need to be changed
-- Pavel On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > 30003 > ----- > > 10046 Spec new version > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10046 > > Diff information: > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Layout-EstebanLorenzano.29 > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Spec-Core-EstebanLorenzano.90 > > |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
On Mar 19, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> cool, sorry :-) >> > > What is missing: > > -> The bug tracker UI that allows to link to and view bugs without being logged in > (and request a login via the web interface) > -> Fugbugz needs some more configuration (e.g. issue states) > -> Monkey needs to be ported to use fugbugz > -> official announcement that 3.0 development started with a short description on what is planed. Marcus |
In reply to this post by camille teruel
As far as I know, these jobs are integration related.
Ben On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Camille Teruel <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
On Mar 19, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> cool, sorry :-) >> > > What is missing: > > -> The bug tracker UI that allows to link to and view bugs without being logged in > (and request a login via the web interface) > -> Fugbugz needs some more configuration (e.g. issue states) > -> Monkey needs to be ported to use fugbugz We should address these points this friday Ben > But it looks already quite good. > > Marcus > > > |
In reply to this post by Benjamin Van Ryseghem (Pharo)
On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes, and one of them runs all tests, one of them pushed the result to files.pharo.org. What else is wanted?
|
Wich one is the one providing me the latest version of the image ?
Ben On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
On Mar 19, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
The last one (step 4). Marcus
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |