[update 3.0] #30086

30086
-----

10425 DateAndTime refactoring
        https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10425

Diff information:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/KernelTests-MarcusDenker.504
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1410
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Fuel-MarcusDenker.764

Marcus Denker-4 wrote

30086
...
10425 DateAndTime refactoring

Hooray, I love progress on DateAndTime... this one was reeeeally ugly!

On 04 May 2013, at 08:37, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On May 3, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Milan Mimica <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> How about a 2.0 backport?
>>
> Good question…

That will be quite difficult: it is a pretty aggressive refactoring, based on some important modifications that came before it, and it will need further debugging - typical for the current dev branch, hard to do cleanly in a stable branch.

mmimica wrote

How about a 2.0 backport?

As much as you all know I love backporting, in this case it's probably not a good place to apply resources. The changes are deep and it's been broken for years.