upgrading methods

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
24 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upgrading methods

stephane ducasse
>
> The latest versions of these packages should work. In case you run
> into some problems just ask again, I've done this a 100 times already
> ;-)

So this proves that may be we should have a way to say update to a  
package :")
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upgrading methods

stephane ducasse
In reply to this post by Philippe Marschall
This gives me the impression that it would be really important to  
have a protocol
to make sure that package developer can specify what action should be  
done on upgrade.
Doing all the time the same is a clear sign that we are missing  
something.


Stef
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upgrading methods

Brad Fuller
stephane ducasse wrote:
> This gives me the impression that it would be really important to have a
> protocol
> to make sure that package developer can specify what action should be
> done on upgrade.
> Doing all the time the same is a clear sign that we are missing something.

YES! Nail on the Head.
Especially since the recipe for updating will most likely change.

--
brad fuller
  http://www.Sonaural.com/
  +1 (408) 799-6124


_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: upgrading methods

Jason Johnson-3
Universes or something similar - up.     Hand written upgrade scripts -
down.


Brad Fuller wrote:

> stephane ducasse wrote:
>> This gives me the impression that it would be really important to
>> have a protocol
>> to make sure that package developer can specify what action should be
>> done on upgrade.
>> Doing all the time the same is a clear sign that we are missing
>> something.
>
> YES! Nail on the Head.
> Especially since the recipe for updating will most likely change.
>


_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
12