us can has mc2?

>
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo?  (I could not
>> find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
>>
>> I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have
>> been resolved.  Is anyone on this topic?  Is there a good reason to
>> stick with the old MC?
>
> -support
> -open and public repository aka SS2
> -understanding
> -process
> -tools
>
> at least for me.
> So we will but not now our plate is quite full.
>
> Stef
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere.  Should it be an issue,
> or should it be on one of the wiki pages?
>
> I searched, but found nothing.
>
> Is this the right page?
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm
>
> - on
>
> On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo?  (I could not
>>> find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
>>>
>>> I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have
>>> been resolved.  Is anyone on this topic?  Is there a good reason to
>>> stick with the old MC?
>>
>> -support
>> -open and public repository aka SS2
>> -understanding
>> -process
>> -tools
>>
>> at least for me.
>> So we will but not now our plate is quite full.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>