Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Moose

userDefinedEdges

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Stéphane Ducasse

userDefinedEdges

Hi

I was following an exercise written by alex and the following code does not work

| superclassEdges |
luModel := (MooseModel allInstances last).
luClasses := luModel allModelClasses.
view shape rectangle size: [ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations size ].
view nodes: luClasses.
superclassEdges := view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: superclassEdges.

view shape line color: Color red.
view edges: luClasses from: #yourself toAll:
[ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations atClassScope ]

edgesFrom: raises an error several candidates.

and I do not understand why.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: userDefinedEdges

Apparently my model was corrupted. now on a real example this example produce a red sqare so there is something strange in exported invocations
or something like that.
On Sep 28, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I was following an exercise written by alex and the following code does not work
>
>
>
> | superclassEdges |
> luModel := (MooseModel allInstances last).
> luClasses := luModel allModelClasses.
> view shape rectangle size: [ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations size ].
> view nodes: luClasses.
> superclassEdges := view edgesFrom: #superclass.
> view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: superclassEdges.
>
> view shape line color: Color red.
> view edges: luClasses from: #yourself toAll:
> [ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations atClassScope ]
>
>
> edgesFrom: raises an error several candidates.
>
> and I do not understand why.
>
> Stef
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

abergel

Re: userDefinedEdges

In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

Strange. I obtain a visualization that looks like this one:

I have no error, except a warning saying that I should use atTypeScope instead of atClassScope.

By the way, I am not sure why we have changed atClassScope -> atTypeScope. Their names implies a different meaning.

Alexandre

On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

I was following an exercise written by alex and the following code does not work

| superclassEdges |
luModel := (MooseModel allInstances last).
luClasses := luModel allModelClasses.
view shape rectangle size: [ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations size ].
view nodes: luClasses.
superclassEdges := view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: superclassEdges.

view shape line color: Color red.
view edges: luClasses from: #yourself toAll:
[ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations atClassScope ]

edgesFrom: raises an error several candidates.

and I do not understand why.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: userDefinedEdges

On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:29 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Strange. I obtain a visualization that looks like this one:

yes i got the same too and it looks not usable :)

<Screen Shot 2013-09-28 at 10.28.04 PM.png>

I have no error, except a warning saying that I should use atTypeScope instead of atClassScope.
By the way, I am not sure why we have changed atClassScope -> atTypeScope. Their names implies a different meaning.

me too :)

Alexandre

On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

I was following an exercise written by alex and the following code does not work

| superclassEdges |
luModel := (MooseModel allInstances last).
luClasses := luModel allModelClasses.
view shape rectangle size: [ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations size ].
view nodes: luClasses.
superclassEdges := view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: superclassEdges.

view shape line color: Color red.
view edges: luClasses from: #yourself toAll:
[ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations atClassScope ]

edgesFrom: raises an error several candidates.

and I do not understand why.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Tudor Girba-2

Re: userDefinedEdges

This was discussed in details several times in the past.

The reason is this:

- FAMIXClass is only one of the subclasses of FAMIXType.

- When working with systems like Java, you get in your model many types that are not FAMIXClass (e.g., FAMIXParameterizedType which models a specific generic type)

- When atClassScope was first created, #methods and #attributes were defined in FAMIXClass. In the meantime, we generalized the model, and we now have FAMIXType defining #methods and #attributes. The subtypes of FAMIXType are now responsible for handling only extra semantics. So essentially, the old atClassScope does correspond now with atTypeScope.

Cheers,

Doru

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Sep 29, 2013, at 3:29 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Strange. I obtain a visualization that looks like this one:
yes i got the same too and it looks not usable :)

<Screen Shot 2013-09-28 at 10.28.04 PM.png>

I have no error, except a warning saying that I should use atTypeScope instead of atClassScope.

By the way, I am not sure why we have changed atClassScope -> atTypeScope. Their names implies a different meaning.

me too :)

Alexandre

On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi

I was following an exercise written by alex and the following code does not work

| superclassEdges |
luModel := (MooseModel allInstances last).
luClasses := luModel allModelClasses.
view shape rectangle size: [ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations size ].
view nodes: luClasses.
superclassEdges := view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view treeLayout userDefinedEdges: superclassEdges.

view shape line color: Color red.
view edges: luClasses from: #yourself toAll:
[ :cls | cls queryAllOutgoingInvocations atClassScope ]

edgesFrom: raises an error several candidates.

and I do not understand why.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev