Why was Timestamp>>subtractSeconds: changed to return an integer instead of a new instance of a Timestamp? ^Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 September 23, 2010 9:19:51.311 ^Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 3462686418 This message may contain confidential information and is intended for specific recipients unless explicitly noted otherwise. If you have reason to believe you are not an intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. This message may not represent the opinion of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (ICE), its subsidiaries or affiliates, and does not constitute a contract or guarantee. Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and the recipient of this message is expected to provide safeguards from viruses and pursue alternate means of communication where privacy or a binding message is desired. _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
Paul, I just tested this on clean visual.im in both 7.7 and 7.7.1, “7.7” Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 23 September 2010 14:25:03 “7.7.1” Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 23 September 2010 14:25:21 It might be some third-party override in your image? Regards, -Boris -- DeepCove Labs Ltd. +1 (604) 689-0322 4th floor, 595 Howe Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6C 2T5 http://tinyurl.com/r7uw4 PacNet Services (Europe) Ltd. +353 (0)61 714-360 Shannon Airport House, SFZ County Clare, Ireland http://tinyurl.com/y952amr CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email is intended only for the persons named in the message header. Unless otherwise indicated, it contains information that is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete the entire message including any attachments. Thank you. From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Paul Baumann Why was Timestamp>>subtractSeconds: changed to return an integer instead of a new instance of a Timestamp? ^Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 September 23, 2010 9:19:51.311 ^Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 3462686418 This message may contain confidential information and is intended for specific recipients unless explicitly noted otherwise. If you have reason to believe you are not an intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. This message may not represent the opinion of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (ICE), its subsidiaries or affiliates, and does not constitute a contract or guarantee. Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and the recipient of this message is expected to provide safeguards from viruses and pursue alternate means of communication where privacy or a binding message is desired. _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
In reply to this post by Paul Baumann
Disregard. It isn't that way in the base VW 7.1.1. Something else wrong. From: Paul Baumann
Why was Timestamp>>subtractSeconds: changed to return an integer instead of a new instance of a Timestamp? ^Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 September 23, 2010 9:19:51.311 ^Timestamp now subtractSeconds: 86400 3462686418 This message may contain confidential information and is intended for specific recipients unless explicitly noted otherwise. If you have reason to believe you are not an intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. This message may not represent the opinion of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (ICE), its subsidiaries or affiliates, and does not constitute a contract or guarantee. Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and the recipient of this message is expected to provide safeguards from viruses and pursue alternate means of communication where privacy or a binding message is desired. _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |