[vwnc] [Fwd: Re: [7.6] RB question]

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[vwnc] [Fwd: Re: [7.6] RB question]

Andres Fortier-2
Hi Travis, thanks for the detailed answer!

> I'm not clear on what you're looking for I guess. The tabs ARE  
> ordered. See the class side methods of CodeModel in the "tool  
> registration" method category. Each method returns a tool class. Each  
> method is tagged with something like:
>
> <tool: 900>

Ok, that is just what I was looking for (btw, I know that tabs have an
order, I just wanted to re-order them according to my tastes, so that,
eg. Definition is always the first, Source code is the second, etc, etc)

> [snip]
> As long as I'm rambling about all of this... yes I recognize that the  
> higher prevalence of the comment is disconcerting at times (maybe  
> always). I personally like it. It makes me write better class  
> comments. I maintain that there is some value in it. But recognize we  
> need a better solution. Something that integrates these pieces of  
> information, and uses a more structured display for class definition  
> is where I'm leaning.

Well, I guess it is a matter of personal tastes... Maybe I guess it
would be better to have a settings page where you can order the lists
of tools and, on selection, configure the basics of each tool (e.g.
whether to show the tool when there is no selection). Just a thought.

Thanks again,
                         Andrés


--
Saludos,
              Andrés
_______________________________________________
vwnc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc