Smalltalk › Cincom › VisualWorks

[vwnc] is this a XMLTypesParser bug or a bad formed xsd ?

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

2 messages Options

Martin Rubi

[vwnc] is this a XMLTypesParser bug or a bad formed xsd ?

When I try to generate a binding using the XMLTypesParser, I get a walkback
for a schema containing something like this:

<xs:complexType>
<xs:choice>
<xs:element ref="operacion"/>
<xs:element ref="resultado"/>
</xs:choice>
<xs:attribute name="version" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:complexType>

if I qualify the refereneces,
<xs:element ref="ns:operacion"/>

it works fine.
Are unqualified refs invalid ?

_______________________________________________
vwnc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc

Kogan, Tamara

Re: [vwnc] is this a XMLTypesParser bug or a bad formed xsd ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of Martin Rubi
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 12:14 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [vwnc] is this a XMLTypesParser bug or a bad formed xsd ?
>
> When I try to generate a binding using the XMLTypesParser, I get a
> walkback
> for a schema containing something like this:
>
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:choice>
> <xs:element ref="operacion"/>
> <xs:element ref="resultado"/>
> </xs:choice>
> <xs:attribute name="version" type="xs:string"/>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> if I qualify the refereneces,
> <xs:element ref="ns:operacion"/>
>
> it works fine.
> Are unqualified refs invalid ?

There are valid but to resolve them we need default namespace defined in the xml schema.

Tamara

_______________________________________________
vwnc mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc