w3 validator doesn't pass many seaside/pier pages

http://validator.w3.org/

many seaside.st pages  found to have lots of errors according to the
automatic validator.
e.g. http://www.seaside.st/community/weblogs

Likewise with forcing it to use another validator than the one specified
in the webpage.

http://www.piercms.com/  homepage  shows errors also


Lawson
_______________________________________________
Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

On 7/11/10 7:28 AM, Lawson English wrote:
> http://validator.w3.org/
>
> many seaside.st pages  found to have lots of errors according to the
> automatic validator.
> e.g. http://www.seaside.st/community/weblogs


OTOH, the google home page doesn't pass either: http://www.google.com 
so why should anything else?

Lawson
_______________________________________________
Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

On 7/11/10 7:49 AM, Lawson English wrote:
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-importance-of-valid-source-code-w3c-validation/5166/


points out that search engines and other web bot tools may not be as
forgiving as the main browsers, so content from non-standard pages may
not show up on google and other sites.

Food for thought.

Lawson
_______________________________________________
Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki