Hi guys
just to let you know that we run a dependencies breaking sprint yesterday and it was great. We will redo one or two. Our goal is to minimise the dependencies of adding Monticello to the pharo bootstrap. What I can tell you is that having a bootstrap is bringing an ***AMAZING*** level of cleaner design. I suspected it. But when we see the real cases this is obvious and really important. I will really open a complete new world for Pharo in terms of modularity (of course it will take time but this is really really cool). Stef |
This is exciting. Thanks a lot for this effort! Doru On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:50 AM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi guys |
In reply to this post by stepharo
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:50 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi guys > > just to let you know that we run a dependencies breaking sprint yesterday > and it was great. We will redo one or two. > Our goal is to minimise the dependencies of adding Monticello to the pharo > bootstrap. What I can tell you is that having a bootstrap is bringing > an ***AMAZING*** level of cleaner design. I suspected it. But when we > see the real cases this is obvious and really important. > I will really open a complete new world for Pharo in terms of modularity (of > course it will take time but this is really really cool). > > Stef > Sounds like food for an academic paper - addressing one of the key complaints from detractors about Smalltalk. While you want to position Pharo as going beyond Smalltalk, reproducibility of an Image remains an argument available to detractors. cheers -ben |
In reply to this post by stepharo
Boostrapping is removing a ton of black magic indeed. There will be not one Pharo but the Pharo one needs for a given purpose. That's awesome. Phil Le 15 août 2015 10:50, "stepharo" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
Hi guys |
In reply to this post by stepharo
Le 15/08/2015 10:50, stepharo a écrit :
> Hi guys > > just to let you know that we run a dependencies breaking sprint > yesterday and it was great. > We will redo one or two. > Our goal is to minimise the dependencies of adding Monticello to the > pharo bootstrap. > What I can tell you is that having a bootstrap is bringing an > ***AMAZING*** level of cleaner design. > I suspected it. But when we see the real cases this is obvious and > really important. > I will really open a complete new world for Pharo in terms of modularity > (of course it will take time > but this is really really cool). Yes! Thierry > Stef > > |
In reply to this post by stepharo
yeap this is extremely important in making pharo far more flexible. It would be great if one day making custom images is just a few clicks away. Image fitting to the exact needs of its users instead of trying to cram everything into a single image.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 11:50 AM stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi guys |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
I forgot to mention that people can help since we added a tahe
pharo-bootstrap.
Stef Le 15/8/15 10:53, Tudor Girba a écrit :
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Yes! Thanks! This is valuable Alexandre
|
In reply to this post by stepharo
A "how to help with Pharo Bootstrap" article could help us help you ;)
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:49 PM stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by stepharo
what's a tahe? Le 15 août 2015 15:49, "stepharo" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
Le 15/08/2015 16:47, [hidden email] a écrit :
> what's a tahe? > I think he wanted to say "tag". On Fogbugz you have a category "Pharo Bootstrap". > Le 15 août 2015 15:49, "stepharo" <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> a écrit : > > I forgot to mention that people can help since we added a tahe > pharo-bootstrap. > > Stef > Cyril signature.asc (836 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by kilon.alios
This is easy we are looking at dependencies using the dependency
analyzer (available in the catalog)
and looking at how to reduce dependencies. Often it is creating a separate package, providing an extension hook... Guille and Christophe started to add fogbugz entries for a first set of problems. Stef Le 15/8/15 16:32, Dimitris Chloupis a
écrit :
|
ah ok thats much more clear thanks Stef will take a look at fogbugz :) On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 11:19 PM stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |