Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

20 messages Options

Stéphane Ducasse

we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

Hi guys

does anybody know how we can fix that?

Stef

Igor Stasenko

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

On 25 February 2011 18:54, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> does anybody know how we can fix that?
>

whaaat?
that's really bad :(

> Stef
>
>
>

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Tudor Girba

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.

You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.

Cheers,
Doru

On 25 Feb 2011, at 18:58, Igor Stasenko wrote:

> On 25 February 2011 18:54, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi guys
>>
>> does anybody know how we can fix that?
>>
>
> whaaat?
> that's really bad :(
>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko

Yes

May be we should check for another bugtracking system and ask if we can run it on
an inria server.

Stef

Marcus Denker-4

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko

On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:

> Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
>
> You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
>
Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports.
Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic...

This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports...

Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).

Marcus

--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Lukas Renggli

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy
(kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)

Lukas

On 25 February 2011 22:29, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
>>
>> You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
>>
> Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports.
> Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic...
>
> This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports...
>
> Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
>
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> --
> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>
>
>

--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch

Igor Stasenko

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy
> (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)

i don't know such people personally.

And as to me a community resources should not depend on good will of
single person (or organization),
because it makes the whole construction quite fragile.

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Lukas Renggli

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

On 26 February 2011 00:16, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy
>> (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
>
> i don't know such people personally.

Yes, I don't know you either.

Lukas

--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch

Igor Stasenko

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

On 26 February 2011 00:17, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 26 February 2011 00:16, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy
>>> (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
>>
>> i don't know such people personally.
>
> Yes, I don't know you either.
>
that was rude.

To clarify, i meant i don't know anyone who could help with that.
But if you do, feel free to ask for help.

> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
>

--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Lukas Renggli

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

I am probably expressing myself badly, but the quota of the Pharo
project is already increased. There is also an issue tracker for the
issue tracker: http://code.google.com/p/support/

Lukas

On Saturday, 26 February 2011, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 26 February 2011 00:17, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 26 February 2011 00:16, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy
>>>> (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
>>>
>>> i don't know such people personally.
>>
>> Yes, I don't know you either.
>>
> that was rude.
>
>
> To clarify, i meant i don't know anyone who could help with that.
> But if you do, feel free to ask for help.
>
>
>
>> Lukas
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
>

--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch

David T. Lewis

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko

Marcus Denker-4

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko

On Feb 26, 2011, at 1:15 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:

>> .
>>
>
> I do not think it was meant to be rude. I am guessing that this was
> just a way to say thank you to Nathanael SchÃ¤rli, an esteemed
> Squeak (Pharo) alumnus who IIRC is now working for Google.
>
Lukas does, too. (the black hole is sucking everyone in...)

> For myself, I don't know any of the Squeak/Pharo folks personally,
> so I don't think there is anything wrong with that :)

Of course there is something wrong with that! ;-) It's actually a lot of fun
to meet in person...

Marcus

--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

David T. Lewis

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Marcus Denker wrote:

>
> On Feb 26, 2011, at 1:15 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
> >> .
> >>
> >
> > I do not think it was meant to be rude. I am guessing that this was
> > just a way to say thank you to Nathanael Sch??rli, an esteemed
> > Squeak (Pharo) alumnus who IIRC is now working for Google.
> >
> Lukas does, too. (the black hole is sucking everyone in...)
>
> > For myself, I don't know any of the Squeak/Pharo folks personally,
> > so I don't think there is anything wrong with that :)
>
>
> Of course there is something wrong with that! ;-) It's actually a lot of fun
> to meet in person...

You are right of course! I hope to have a chane to do that :)

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4

>
>
> Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).

Does anybody has experience with them?
It would be good to be able to play with them.

Stef

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli

tx lukas
Do you know if there is a normal process to request such increase?

Stef

On Feb 25, 2011, at 11:53 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:

> Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy
> (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
>
> Lukas
>
> On 25 February 2011 22:29, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
>>>
>>> You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
>>>
>> Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports.
>> Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic...
>>
>> This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports...
>>
>> Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
>>
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>

Tudor Girba

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

Yes. Lukas pointed us to the docs. You can find the answer here:
http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/FAQ#What_other_limits_exist?

Cheers,
Doru

On 26 Feb 2011, at 22:05, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> tx lukas
> Do you know if there is a normal process to request such increase?
>
> Stef
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 11:53 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>
>> Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy
>> (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> On 25 February 2011 22:29, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>
>>>> Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
>>>>
>>>> You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
>>>>
>>> Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports.
>>> Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic...
>>>
>>> This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports...
>>>
>>> Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
>>>
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
>>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."

Lukas Renggli

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

On 26 February 2011 22:05, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
> tx lukas
> Do you know if there is a normal process to request such increase?

Create an issue in the issue tracker of Google Code (see
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/list) and ask for a quota
increase. Alternatively you might try to directly contact one of the
projects members of Google Code (see
http://code.google.com/p/support/). I contacted Nathaniel (this is not
Nathanael Schärli), because I saw that he helped other projects with
similar issues too.

Lukas

--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch

Miguel Cobá

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

Redmine is the one I use and it is really good.

El sáb, 26-02-2011 a las 18:55 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:

> >
> >
> > Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
>
> Does anybody has experience with them?
> It would be good to be able to play with them.
>
> Stef
>
>

--
Miguel Cobá
http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx

NorbertHartl

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse

On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).

Does anybody has experience with them?
It would be good to be able to play with them.

I just want to ask if there are any plans to integrate issue support in the new squeaksource development. I don't know redmine but it looks similar to trac I'm using since a few years. I also know jira. To me one of the biggest gains of these systems is the integration of source, issues, timeline and wiki. You can easily reference a ticket from the wiki, a ticket from a commit message etc. In trac it is #<number> is interpreted as a link to a ticket. In jira it is <projectname>-<projectnumber>. In jira you can alter the issue tracker by committing new sources. If you write yourproject-58 into the commit than you can change the state of the ticket to something like "needs check" "treated" etc. It sounds a bit blurry but it helps a lot.

Sad but true biblicello [1] wasn't in place at the right time. I think it has huge potential by leveraging pier usage.

Norbert

[1] http://a-bibliocello.gemstone.com/bibliocello/

Miguel Cobá

Re: we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker

El dom, 27-02-2011 a las 12:02 +0100, Norbert Hartl escribió:

>
> On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe
> > > https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
> >
> > Does anybody has experience with them?
> > It would be good to be able to play with them.
> >
>
>
> I just want to ask if there are any plans to integrate issue support
> in the new squeaksource development. I don't know redmine but it looks
> similar to trac I'm using since a few years. I also know jira. To me
> one of the biggest gains of these systems is the integration of
> source, issues, timeline and wiki. You can easily reference a ticket
> from the wiki, a ticket from a commit message etc. In trac it is
> #<number> is interpreted as a link to a ticket. In jira it is
> <projectname>-<projectnumber>. In jira you can alter the issue tracker
> by committing new sources. If you write yourproject-58 into the commit
> than you can change the state of the ticket to something like "needs
> check" "treated" etc. It sounds a bit blurry but it helps a lot.

Yes, redmine has those capabilities too. And as you said, they are very
helpful indeed to automate things.

>
>
> Sad but true biblicello [1] wasn't in place at the right time. I think
> it has huge potential by leveraging pier usage.
>
>
> Norbert
>
>
> [1] http://a-bibliocello.gemstone.com/bibliocello/

--
Miguel Cobá
http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx