marcus like that we do not have to load it all the time.
I could esaily update scriptloader to make sure that we do not save these packages. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I wouldn't pre-load it. There is really no point for many deployed
applications to have it in there. Lukas On 27 August 2010 13:33, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > marcus like that we do not have to load it all the time. > I could esaily update scriptloader to make sure that we do not save these packages. > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote: I wouldn't pre-load it. There is really no point for many deployed You can unload it in #cleanUpForRelease or #cleanUpForProduction. But I wouldn't pre-load it neither i think (I am not sure) Lukas _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Lukas Renggli
sure
this is just that during the unstable phase we need better tools. We want to run SmallLint. The problem is that generate a new image every 20 min when I integrate and I do not want to spend my time load ob and rb. After we will unload it. And yes I should work on a configuration of pharo and rebuild the scriptloader infrastructure on it :( Stef On Aug 27, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > I wouldn't pre-load it. There is really no point for many deployed > applications to have it in there. > > Lukas > > On 27 August 2010 13:33, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: >> marcus like that we do not have to load it all the time. >> I could esaily update scriptloader to make sure that we do not save these packages. >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: sure Hudson isn't your friend for this ? Laurent After we will unload it. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
>
> Hudson isn't your friend for this ? no when I batch fixes I cannot wait for something that start and can take 15 min. I prefer to update often to separate commit for tracebility so speed in making new image is important. It is already so slow. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |