Hi, I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the DistributionMap itSelf. I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a good idea?). So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able to test it by right-clicking on a FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, but this visualization could be applied on any kind of element) I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, so that you can see how to use it. Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would you change?, what would you had?, any suggestions? The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to do that now :) _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering.
So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault).
2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> Hi,I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the DistributionMap itSelf. I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a good idea?). So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able to test it by right-clicking on a FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, but this visualization could be applied on any kind of element) I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, so that you can see how to use it. Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would you change?, what would you had?, any suggestions?The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to do that now :) _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Cyrille
I have the impression that packaging Distribution out of mondrian is better since you want to load mondrian without the algo packages. Stef On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. > So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). > > > 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> > Hi, > I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the DistributionMap itSelf. > I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a good idea?). > So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able to test it by right-clicking on a > FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder > (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, but this visualization could be applied > on any kind of element) > I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, so that you can see how to use it. > Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would you change?, what would you had?, any > suggestions? > > The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to do that now :) > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi Stef,
He did package it outside :). Moose-MondrianScripts is a Moose package. But, on the other hand, we need to merge Moose-MondrianScripts and Moose-MondrianPaintings. I like the second one better, because it is in line with the metaphor of Mondrian (a painter painting paintings :)) Cheers, Doru On 10 Mar 2010, at 17:10, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Cyrille > > I have the impression that packaging Distribution out of mondrian is > better since you want to load mondrian without the algo packages. > > Stef > On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > >> I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors >> and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. >> So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing >> it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). >> >> >> 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> >> Hi, >> I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the >> DistributionMap itSelf. >> I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a >> good idea?). >> So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be >> able to test it by right-clicking on a >> FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder >> (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, >> but this visualization could be applied >> on any kind of element) >> I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, >> so that you can see how to use it. >> Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what >> would you change?, what would you had?, any >> suggestions? >> >> The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to >> do that now :) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 10 mars 2010, at 17:20, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi Stef, > > He did package it outside :). Moose-MondrianScripts is a Moose package. > > But, on the other hand, we need to merge Moose-MondrianScripts and Moose-MondrianPaintings. I like the second one better, because it is in line with the metaphor of Mondrian (a painter painting paintings :)) Yep, first there was only Moose-MondrianScripts, which hold simple mondrian scripts as class extensions to FamixEntity subclasses. Then there was more complex visualization like CycleTable, DistributionMap, which need their own classes. It was better to put them in separate packages (or at least separate categories for now). I actually think there is already a first port of DistriMap (which probably can be discarded) > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 17:10, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Cyrille >> >> I have the impression that packaging Distribution out of mondrian is better since you want to load mondrian without the algo packages. >> >> Stef >> On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >> >>> I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. >>> So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). >>> >>> >>> 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> >>> Hi, >>> I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the DistributionMap itSelf. >>> I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a good idea?). >>> So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able to test it by right-clicking on a >>> FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder >>> (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, but this visualization could be applied >>> on any kind of element) >>> I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, so that you can see how to use it. >>> Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would you change?, what would you had?, any >>> suggestions? >>> >>> The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to do that now :) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle." > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba
Ok I missed the Moose- :)
On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi Stef, > > He did package it outside :). Moose-MondrianScripts is a Moose package. > > But, on the other hand, we need to merge Moose-MondrianScripts and Moose-MondrianPaintings. I like the second one better, because it is in line with the metaphor of Mondrian (a painter painting paintings :)) :) > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 17:10, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Cyrille >> >> I have the impression that packaging Distribution out of mondrian is better since you want to load mondrian without the algo packages. >> >> Stef >> On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >> >>> I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. >>> So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). >>> >>> >>> 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> >>> Hi, >>> I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the DistributionMap itSelf. >>> I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a good idea?). >>> So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able to test it by right-clicking on a >>> FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder >>> (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, but this visualization could be applied >>> on any kind of element) >>> I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, so that you can see how to use it. >>> Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would you change?, what would you had?, any >>> suggestions? >>> >>> The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to do that now :) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle." > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by cdelaunay
I tried and it works fine.
This is really cool! Alexandre On 10 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors > and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. > So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing > it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). > > > 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> > Hi, > I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the > DistributionMap itSelf. > I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a > good idea?). > So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able > to test it by right-clicking on a > FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder > (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, > but this visualization could be applied > on any kind of element) > I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, > so that you can see how to use it. > Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would > you change?, what would you had?, any > suggestions? > The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to > do that now :) > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Excellent work, Cyrille!
I gave it a try and it's pretty nice. Of course, I have some comments :). - first, I went over the visual rendering and changed it a bit have less striking borders and to use a flow layout for the parts so that they try to form a rectangle even when they have different sizes. - still missing for the visualization are the labels of the parts. It would be great if this got added. - the overall wizzard is pretty nice, but it is in parts slightly too specific. For example, to select the elements I can choose from only the meta-described properties. This is nice, for most of the things, but maybe you could also allow me to write a script there. A similar situation happens with the property selectors. But, on the other hand this is pretty nice for newcomers because they do not have to write anything. - in the second screen (Property values) we always get the same values regardless of what properties we selected previously. This is ok if we just choose between number properties, but when we have other kind of properties the window should propose different defaults. - currently, the distribution map is popped up from the group of parts, which is Ok, but I would want to have it also from the group of elements and from that to select the group of parts. Like this we could cover several kinds of logical operators (I have the elements and derive the parts, or I have the parts and I derive the elements). That is about it for the moment. But don't get me wrong. I really really like this, especially that it means that the algorithms are back on track. Yuppeee :). Cheers, Doru On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:40, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > I tried and it works fine. > > This is really cool! > > Alexandre > > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > >> I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors >> and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. >> So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing >> it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). >> >> >> 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> >> Hi, >> I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the >> DistributionMap itSelf. >> I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a >> good idea?). >> So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be >> able to test it by right-clicking on a >> FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder >> (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, >> but this visualization could be applied >> on any kind of element) >> I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, >> so that you can see how to use it. >> Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what >> would you change?, what would you had?, any >> suggestions? >> The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to >> do that now :) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing should have the right to be different." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hello, There is still some things I have to look for: - allow the visualization to be pop up from the group of elements
- refactor the code Also, in which package should I finally put all those classes 'Moose- MondrianScripts' or 'Moose-MondrianPaontongs' ?
2010/3/10 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> Excellent work, Cyrille! _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 15 mars 2010, at 13:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:
the second one, create a subcategory Moose-MondrianPaintings-DistributionMap if necessary
-- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi guys, I have made some improvements about the distribution map: - we can now launch the wizard from a group deciding to use it as parts or as elements - I change the code of the distributionMap itself, so that now we have two simple 'constructors' => onContainers:elements:propery: => onElements:containers:property Using them, a default colour will be set to the first ten different values of the property. You can still set your own maping with your own colors. - In the second pane of the wizard, I added a checkbox, enabling to use this default color system when selected. - I have kept the computation of 'possible' lists of selectors, to choose elements, property and now parts to base on the map. Now, for some types, it can take some time to open the wizard. I don't know if having a 'light' wizard can be a good idea? - In any case, dendrogram clustering for a large number of entities can be very very long 2010/3/15 Simon Denier <[hidden email]>
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi Cyrille,
This is nice to see distribution map the focus of some effort. I just want to report my successful experience: I tried to create a map that put long methods in red (say > 10 LOC), and the remaining in blue. But I am not sure how to beging. I selected 'launch Distribution map from those elements', but what I should fill in 'type of parts' is not apparent to me. I therefore decided to opt for 'launch Distribution map from those parts'. I selected methods in pre-initialized list since this is what I want to visualize. In the 'pre-initialized list', elements are not ordered. Maybe it would help. I finally found numberOfLinesOfCode. I selected next and was happy to see it finally does what I hoped for. Maybe you can give an opportunity to the user to edit the name of the properties? property2 and property1 is not so nice in the visualization. Excellent job! Alexandre On 24 Mar 2010, at 13:48, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > Hi guys, > I have made some improvements about the distribution map: > - we can now launch the wizard from a group deciding to use it as > parts or as elements > - I change the code of the distributionMap itself, so that now we > have two simple 'constructors' > => onContainers:elements:propery: > => onElements:containers:property > Using them, a default colour will be set to the first ten > different values of the property. > You can still set your own maping with your own colors. > - In the second pane of the wizard, I added a checkbox, enabling to > use this default color system when > selected. > - I have kept the computation of 'possible' lists of selectors, to > choose elements, property and now parts to > base on the map. Now, for some types, it can take some time to open > the wizard. I don't know if having a > 'light' wizard can be a good idea? > - In any case, dendrogram clustering for a large number of entities > can be very very long > > 2010/3/15 Simon Denier <[hidden email]> > > On 15 mars 2010, at 13:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I tried to improve some of those points and all seems to work >> correctly. >> There is still some things I have to look for: >> - allow the visualization to be pop up from the group of elements >> - refactor the code >> Also, in which package should I finally put all those classes >> 'Moose- MondrianScripts' or 'Moose-MondrianPaontongs' ? > > > the second one, create a subcategory Moose-MondrianPaintings- > DistributionMap if necessary > >> >> 2010/3/10 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> >> Excellent work, Cyrille! >> >> I gave it a try and it's pretty nice. Of course, I have some >> comments :). >> >> - first, I went over the visual rendering and changed it a bit have >> less striking borders and to use a flow layout for the parts so >> that they try to form a rectangle even when they have different >> sizes. >> >> - still missing for the visualization are the labels of the parts. >> It would be great if this got added. >> >> - the overall wizzard is pretty nice, but it is in parts slightly >> too specific. For example, to select the elements I can choose from >> only the meta-described properties. This is nice, for most of the >> things, but maybe you could also allow me to write a script there. >> A similar situation happens with the property selectors. But, on >> the other hand this is pretty nice for newcomers because they do >> not have to write anything. >> >> - in the second screen (Property values) we always get the same >> values regardless of what properties we selected previously. This >> is ok if we just choose between number properties, but when we have >> other kind of properties the window should propose different >> defaults. >> >> - currently, the distribution map is popped up from the group of >> parts, which is Ok, but I would want to have it also from the group >> of elements and from that to select the group of parts. Like this >> we could cover several kinds of logical operators (I have the >> elements and derive the parts, or I have the parts and I derive the >> elements). >> >> That is about it for the moment. But don't get me wrong. I really >> really like this, especially that it means that the algorithms are >> back on track. Yuppeee :). >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> >> >> On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:40, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >> I tried and it works fine. >> >> This is really cool! >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 10 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >> >> I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors >> and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. >> So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing >> it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). >> >> >> 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> >> Hi, >> I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the >> DistributionMap itSelf. >> I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a >> good idea?). >> So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be >> able to test it by right-clicking on a >> FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder >> (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, >> but this visualization could be applied >> on any kind of element) >> I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, >> so that you can see how to use it. >> Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what >> would you change?, what would you had?, any >> suggestions? >> The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to >> do that now :) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing should have the right to be different." >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi Cyrille,
Great work! I just have two things: - Would it be possible to have the colors automatically distributed based on importance, instead of me picking? - In the form where we have to select the elements, the tabs are sync so that I cannot choose a pre-initialized list when you do not control the type of the element. However, in the form dedicated to selecting parts, these tabs are not synced. Actually, I think I would prefer if only the upper tab influence the lower one, and not the other way around. Alex, a Distribution Map displays parts and elements. For example, you can have classes as parts and methods as elements, or you can have packages as parts and classes as elements. Now, when you have a ClassGroup in your hand, you will want to decide whether these should be elements of parts. If you choose them to be parts, then you will be asked to specify the elements from these classes. If you choose them to be elements, you will be asked to specify how to obtain the parts from these. Cheers, Doru On 24 Mar 2010, at 23:12, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi Cyrille, > > This is nice to see distribution map the focus of some effort. > I just want to report my successful experience: > > I tried to create a map that put long methods in red (say > 10 LOC), > and the remaining in blue. But I am not sure how to beging. I > selected 'launch Distribution map from those elements', but what I > should fill in 'type of parts' is not apparent to me. > > I therefore decided to opt for 'launch Distribution map from those > parts'. I selected methods in pre-initialized list since this is > what I want to visualize. In the 'pre-initialized list', elements > are not ordered. Maybe it would help. I finally found > numberOfLinesOfCode. I selected next and was happy to see it finally > does what I hoped for. > > Maybe you can give an opportunity to the user to edit the name of > the properties? property2 and property1 is not so nice in the > visualization. > > Excellent job! > > Alexandre > > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 13:48, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> I have made some improvements about the distribution map: >> - we can now launch the wizard from a group deciding to use it as >> parts or as elements >> - I change the code of the distributionMap itself, so that now we >> have two simple 'constructors' >> => onContainers:elements:propery: >> => onElements:containers:property >> Using them, a default colour will be set to the first ten >> different values of the property. >> You can still set your own maping with your own colors. >> - In the second pane of the wizard, I added a checkbox, enabling to >> use this default color system when >> selected. >> - I have kept the computation of 'possible' lists of selectors, to >> choose elements, property and now parts to >> base on the map. Now, for some types, it can take some time to open >> the wizard. I don't know if having a >> 'light' wizard can be a good idea? >> - In any case, dendrogram clustering for a large number of entities >> can be very very long >> >> 2010/3/15 Simon Denier <[hidden email]> >> >> On 15 mars 2010, at 13:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I tried to improve some of those points and all seems to work >>> correctly. >>> There is still some things I have to look for: >>> - allow the visualization to be pop up from the group of elements >>> - refactor the code >>> Also, in which package should I finally put all those classes >>> 'Moose- MondrianScripts' or 'Moose-MondrianPaontongs' ? >> >> >> the second one, create a subcategory Moose-MondrianPaintings- >> DistributionMap if necessary >> >>> >>> 2010/3/10 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> >>> Excellent work, Cyrille! >>> >>> I gave it a try and it's pretty nice. Of course, I have some >>> comments :). >>> >>> - first, I went over the visual rendering and changed it a bit >>> have less striking borders and to use a flow layout for the parts >>> so that they try to form a rectangle even when they have different >>> sizes. >>> >>> - still missing for the visualization are the labels of the parts. >>> It would be great if this got added. >>> >>> - the overall wizzard is pretty nice, but it is in parts slightly >>> too specific. For example, to select the elements I can choose >>> from only the meta-described properties. This is nice, for most of >>> the things, but maybe you could also allow me to write a script >>> there. A similar situation happens with the property selectors. >>> But, on the other hand this is pretty nice for newcomers because >>> they do not have to write anything. >>> >>> - in the second screen (Property values) we always get the same >>> values regardless of what properties we selected previously. This >>> is ok if we just choose between number properties, but when we >>> have other kind of properties the window should propose different >>> defaults. >>> >>> - currently, the distribution map is popped up from the group of >>> parts, which is Ok, but I would want to have it also from the >>> group of elements and from that to select the group of parts. Like >>> this we could cover several kinds of logical operators (I have the >>> elements and derive the parts, or I have the parts and I derive >>> the elements). >>> >>> That is about it for the moment. But don't get me wrong. I really >>> really like this, especially that it means that the algorithms are >>> back on track. Yuppeee :). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:40, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>> I tried and it works fine. >>> >>> This is really cool! >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >>> >>> On 10 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >>> >>> I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors >>> and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. >>> So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing >>> it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). >>> >>> >>> 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> >>> Hi, >>> I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the >>> DistributionMap itSelf. >>> I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a >>> good idea?). >>> So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be >>> able to test it by right-clicking on a >>> FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder >>> (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, >>> but this visualization could be applied >>> on any kind of element) >>> I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, >>> so that you can see how to use it. >>> Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what >>> would you change?, what would you had?, any >>> suggestions? >>> The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to >>> do that now :) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Every thing should have the right to be different." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> Simon >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "What we can governs what we wish." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
> Alex, a Distribution Map displays parts and elements. For example,
> you can have classes as parts and methods as elements, or you can > have packages as parts and classes as elements. Yep. I read the paper some time ago. I kind of forgot the terminology. Adding property names will be cool too Alexandre > > > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 23:12, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Hi Cyrille, >> >> This is nice to see distribution map the focus of some effort. >> I just want to report my successful experience: >> >> I tried to create a map that put long methods in red (say > 10 >> LOC), and the remaining in blue. But I am not sure how to beging. I >> selected 'launch Distribution map from those elements', but what I >> should fill in 'type of parts' is not apparent to me. >> >> I therefore decided to opt for 'launch Distribution map from those >> parts'. I selected methods in pre-initialized list since this is >> what I want to visualize. In the 'pre-initialized list', elements >> are not ordered. Maybe it would help. I finally found >> numberOfLinesOfCode. I selected next and was happy to see it >> finally does what I hoped for. >> >> Maybe you can give an opportunity to the user to edit the name of >> the properties? property2 and property1 is not so nice in the >> visualization. >> >> Excellent job! >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 24 Mar 2010, at 13:48, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> I have made some improvements about the distribution map: >>> - we can now launch the wizard from a group deciding to use it as >>> parts or as elements >>> - I change the code of the distributionMap itself, so that now we >>> have two simple 'constructors' >>> => onContainers:elements:propery: >>> => onElements:containers:property >>> Using them, a default colour will be set to the first ten >>> different values of the property. >>> You can still set your own maping with your own colors. >>> - In the second pane of the wizard, I added a checkbox, enabling >>> to use this default color system when >>> selected. >>> - I have kept the computation of 'possible' lists of selectors, >>> to choose elements, property and now parts to >>> base on the map. Now, for some types, it can take some time to >>> open the wizard. I don't know if having a >>> 'light' wizard can be a good idea? >>> - In any case, dendrogram clustering for a large number of >>> entities can be very very long >>> >>> 2010/3/15 Simon Denier <[hidden email]> >>> >>> On 15 mars 2010, at 13:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I tried to improve some of those points and all seems to work >>>> correctly. >>>> There is still some things I have to look for: >>>> - allow the visualization to be pop up from the group of elements >>>> - refactor the code >>>> Also, in which package should I finally put all those classes >>>> 'Moose- MondrianScripts' or 'Moose-MondrianPaontongs' ? >>> >>> >>> the second one, create a subcategory Moose-MondrianPaintings- >>> DistributionMap if necessary >>> >>>> >>>> 2010/3/10 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> >>>> Excellent work, Cyrille! >>>> >>>> I gave it a try and it's pretty nice. Of course, I have some >>>> comments :). >>>> >>>> - first, I went over the visual rendering and changed it a bit >>>> have less striking borders and to use a flow layout for the parts >>>> so that they try to form a rectangle even when they have >>>> different sizes. >>>> >>>> - still missing for the visualization are the labels of the >>>> parts. It would be great if this got added. >>>> >>>> - the overall wizzard is pretty nice, but it is in parts slightly >>>> too specific. For example, to select the elements I can choose >>>> from only the meta-described properties. This is nice, for most >>>> of the things, but maybe you could also allow me to write a >>>> script there. A similar situation happens with the property >>>> selectors. But, on the other hand this is pretty nice for >>>> newcomers because they do not have to write anything. >>>> >>>> - in the second screen (Property values) we always get the same >>>> values regardless of what properties we selected previously. This >>>> is ok if we just choose between number properties, but when we >>>> have other kind of properties the window should propose different >>>> defaults. >>>> >>>> - currently, the distribution map is popped up from the group of >>>> parts, which is Ok, but I would want to have it also from the >>>> group of elements and from that to select the group of parts. >>>> Like this we could cover several kinds of logical operators (I >>>> have the elements and derive the parts, or I have the parts and I >>>> derive the elements). >>>> >>>> That is about it for the moment. But don't get me wrong. I really >>>> really like this, especially that it means that the algorithms >>>> are back on track. Yuppeee :). >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Doru >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:40, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>>> >>>> I tried and it works fine. >>>> >>>> This is really cool! >>>> >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: >>>> >>>> I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors >>>> and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. >>>> So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when >>>> testing it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> >>>> Hi, >>>> I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the >>>> DistributionMap itSelf. >>>> I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it >>>> a good idea?). >>>> So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be >>>> able to test it by right-clicking on a >>>> FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder >>>> (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to >>>> FAMIXClassGroup, but this visualization could be applied >>>> on any kind of element) >>>> I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working >>>> example, so that you can see how to use it. >>>> Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what >>>> would you change?, what would you had?, any >>>> suggestions? >>>> The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going >>>> to do that now :) >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>> >>>> "Every thing should have the right to be different." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> -- >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What we can governs what we wish." > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hello,
You already have the possibility to have automatically-distributed colors: you just have to 'check' the bottom checkbox in the second pane. Now, there is not yet any order to display the different values of the property. All colors are set in a random order.
What is the 'importance order' the map should follow? How can I compute it? I'm looking for the other improvments ;)
2010/3/30 Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]>
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi Cyrille,
In the original paper we used: red, blue, cyan, green, pink, dark- green, yellow, magenta, orange However, in the meantime we changed a bit and now we have the preferred list of colors stored in Color>>strongColors. So, please use this one. Cheers, Doru On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:28, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > Hello, > > You already have the possibility to have automatically-distributed > colors: you just have to 'check' the bottom checkbox in the second > pane. > Now, there is not yet any order to display the different values of > the property. All colors are set in a random order. > What is the 'importance order' the map should follow? How can I > compute it? > I'm looking for the other improvments ;) > > 2010/3/30 Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> > Alex, a Distribution Map displays parts and elements. For example, > you can have classes as parts and methods as elements, or you can > have packages as parts and classes as elements. > > Yep. I read the paper some time ago. I kind of forgot the terminology. > > Adding property names will be cool too > > > Alexandre > > > > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 23:12, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > Hi Cyrille, > > This is nice to see distribution map the focus of some effort. > I just want to report my successful experience: > > I tried to create a map that put long methods in red (say > 10 LOC), > and the remaining in blue. But I am not sure how to beging. I > selected 'launch Distribution map from those elements', but what I > should fill in 'type of parts' is not apparent to me. > > I therefore decided to opt for 'launch Distribution map from those > parts'. I selected methods in pre-initialized list since this is > what I want to visualize. In the 'pre-initialized list', elements > are not ordered. Maybe it would help. I finally found > numberOfLinesOfCode. I selected next and was happy to see it finally > does what I hoped for. > > Maybe you can give an opportunity to the user to edit the name of > the properties? property2 and property1 is not so nice in the > visualization. > > Excellent job! > > Alexandre > > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 13:48, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > Hi guys, > I have made some improvements about the distribution map: > - we can now launch the wizard from a group deciding to use it as > parts or as elements > - I change the code of the distributionMap itself, so that now we > have two simple 'constructors' > => onContainers:elements:propery: > => onElements:containers:property > Using them, a default colour will be set to the first ten different > values of the property. > You can still set your own maping with your own colors. > - In the second pane of the wizard, I added a checkbox, enabling to > use this default color system when > selected. > - I have kept the computation of 'possible' lists of selectors, to > choose elements, property and now parts to > base on the map. Now, for some types, it can take some time to open > the wizard. I don't know if having a > 'light' wizard can be a good idea? > - In any case, dendrogram clustering for a large number of entities > can be very very long > > 2010/3/15 Simon Denier <[hidden email]> > > On 15 mars 2010, at 13:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > Hello, > > I tried to improve some of those points and all seems to work > correctly. > There is still some things I have to look for: > - allow the visualization to be pop up from the group of elements > - refactor the code > Also, in which package should I finally put all those classes > 'Moose- MondrianScripts' or 'Moose-MondrianPaontongs' ? > > > the second one, create a subcategory Moose-MondrianPaintings- > DistributionMap if necessary > > > 2010/3/10 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> > Excellent work, Cyrille! > > I gave it a try and it's pretty nice. Of course, I have some > comments :). > > - first, I went over the visual rendering and changed it a bit have > less striking borders and to use a flow layout for the parts so that > they try to form a rectangle even when they have different sizes. > > - still missing for the visualization are the labels of the parts. > It would be great if this got added. > > - the overall wizzard is pretty nice, but it is in parts slightly > too specific. For example, to select the elements I can choose from > only the meta-described properties. This is nice, for most of the > things, but maybe you could also allow me to write a script there. A > similar situation happens with the property selectors. But, on the > other hand this is pretty nice for newcomers because they do not > have to write anything. > > - in the second screen (Property values) we always get the same > values regardless of what properties we selected previously. This is > ok if we just choose between number properties, but when we have > other kind of properties the window should propose different defaults. > > - currently, the distribution map is popped up from the group of > parts, which is Ok, but I would want to have it also from the group > of elements and from that to select the group of parts. Like this we > could cover several kinds of logical operators (I have the elements > and derive the parts, or I have the parts and I derive the elements). > > That is about it for the moment. But don't get me wrong. I really > really like this, especially that it means that the algorithms are > back on track. Yuppeee :). > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:40, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > I tried and it works fine. > > This is really cool! > > Alexandre > > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors > and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. > So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing > it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). > > > 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> > Hi, > I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the > DistributionMap itSelf. > I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a > good idea?). > So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able > to test it by right-clicking on a > FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder > (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, > but this visualization could be applied > on any kind of element) > I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, > so that you can see how to use it. > Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would > you change?, what would you had?, any > suggestions? > The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to > do that now :) > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing should have the right to be different." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What we can governs what we wish." > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Obvious things are difficult to teach." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Ok, thank you.
Now, how do I set a property value to one of those colors? Can I set them in a random way ?
2010/3/31 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> Hi Cyrille, _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 31 mars 2010, at 16:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: Ok, thank you. I think it was by the order of importance of the property in the system.
-- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by cdelaunay
Hi Cyrille,
In general, you want to encode as much as possible with as few visual differences as possible. Color is a visualization variable, and if you attach it randomly, the only thing it communicates is difference. However, if you preserve some order, you communicate two things. Now, strongColors is an ordered collection, so you should attach these in the order of importance of the properties: the one property that is most used is red, the second is blue etc. Cheers, Doru On 31 Mar 2010, at 16:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > Ok, thank you. > Now, how do I set a property value to one of those colors? Can I set > them in a random way ? > > 2010/3/31 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> > Hi Cyrille, > > In the original paper we used: red, blue, cyan, green, pink, dark- > green, yellow, magenta, orange > > However, in the meantime we changed a bit and now we have the > preferred list of colors stored in Color>>strongColors. So, please > use this one. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:28, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > Hello, > > You already have the possibility to have automatically-distributed > colors: you just have to 'check' the bottom checkbox in the second > pane. > Now, there is not yet any order to display the different values of > the property. All colors are set in a random order. > What is the 'importance order' the map should follow? How can I > compute it? > I'm looking for the other improvments ;) > > 2010/3/30 Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> > Alex, a Distribution Map displays parts and elements. For example, > you can have classes as parts and methods as elements, or you can > have packages as parts and classes as elements. > > Yep. I read the paper some time ago. I kind of forgot the terminology. > > Adding property names will be cool too > > > Alexandre > > > > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 23:12, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > Hi Cyrille, > > This is nice to see distribution map the focus of some effort. > I just want to report my successful experience: > > I tried to create a map that put long methods in red (say > 10 LOC), > and the remaining in blue. But I am not sure how to beging. I > selected 'launch Distribution map from those elements', but what I > should fill in 'type of parts' is not apparent to me. > > I therefore decided to opt for 'launch Distribution map from those > parts'. I selected methods in pre-initialized list since this is > what I want to visualize. In the 'pre-initialized list', elements > are not ordered. Maybe it would help. I finally found > numberOfLinesOfCode. I selected next and was happy to see it finally > does what I hoped for. > > Maybe you can give an opportunity to the user to edit the name of > the properties? property2 and property1 is not so nice in the > visualization. > > Excellent job! > > Alexandre > > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 13:48, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > Hi guys, > I have made some improvements about the distribution map: > - we can now launch the wizard from a group deciding to use it as > parts or as elements > - I change the code of the distributionMap itself, so that now we > have two simple 'constructors' > => onContainers:elements:propery: > => onElements:containers:property > Using them, a default colour will be set to the first ten different > values of the property. > You can still set your own maping with your own colors. > - In the second pane of the wizard, I added a checkbox, enabling to > use this default color system when > selected. > - I have kept the computation of 'possible' lists of selectors, to > choose elements, property and now parts to > base on the map. Now, for some types, it can take some time to open > the wizard. I don't know if having a > 'light' wizard can be a good idea? > - In any case, dendrogram clustering for a large number of entities > can be very very long > > 2010/3/15 Simon Denier <[hidden email]> > > On 15 mars 2010, at 13:14, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > Hello, > > I tried to improve some of those points and all seems to work > correctly. > There is still some things I have to look for: > - allow the visualization to be pop up from the group of elements > - refactor the code > Also, in which package should I finally put all those classes > 'Moose- MondrianScripts' or 'Moose-MondrianPaontongs' ? > > > the second one, create a subcategory Moose-MondrianPaintings- > DistributionMap if necessary > > > 2010/3/10 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> > Excellent work, Cyrille! > > I gave it a try and it's pretty nice. Of course, I have some > comments :). > > - first, I went over the visual rendering and changed it a bit have > less striking borders and to use a flow layout for the parts so that > they try to form a rectangle even when they have different sizes. > > - still missing for the visualization are the labels of the parts. > It would be great if this got added. > > - the overall wizzard is pretty nice, but it is in parts slightly > too specific. For example, to select the elements I can choose from > only the meta-described properties. This is nice, for most of the > things, but maybe you could also allow me to write a script there. A > similar situation happens with the property selectors. But, on the > other hand this is pretty nice for newcomers because they do not > have to write anything. > > - in the second screen (Property values) we always get the same > values regardless of what properties we selected previously. This is > ok if we just choose between number properties, but when we have > other kind of properties the window should propose different defaults. > > - currently, the distribution map is popped up from the group of > parts, which is Ok, but I would want to have it also from the group > of elements and from that to select the group of parts. Like this we > could cover several kinds of logical operators (I have the elements > and derive the parts, or I have the parts and I derive the elements). > > That is about it for the moment. But don't get me wrong. I really > really like this, especially that it means that the algorithms are > back on track. Yuppeee :). > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 18:40, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > I tried and it works fine. > > This is really cool! > > Alexandre > > > On 10 Mar 2010, at 11:51, Cyrille Delaunay wrote: > > I improved the visualization. Now, elements are ordered by colors > and parts are ordered using dendrogram clustering. > So make sure you have the last version of Moose-Algos when testing > it (ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos loadDefault). > > > 2010/3/10 Cyrille Delaunay <[hidden email]> > Hi, > I gived a first try and start to build the wizard and the > DistributionMap itSelf. > I put all my classes in the package Moose-MondrianScripts (is it a > good idea?). > So, by dowloading the last version of this package, you will be able > to test it by right-clicking on a > FAMIXClassGroup in a MooseFinder > (For the moment, I have only added a menu item to FAMIXClassGroup, > but this visualization could be applied > on any kind of element) > I fill-in the default inputs of the wizard with a working example, > so that you can see how to use it. > Just tell me if it looks like to what you were expecting, what would > you change?, what would you had?, any > suggestions? > The visualization itself is not yet well-implemented. I'm going to > do that now :) > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing should have the right to be different." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What we can governs what we wish." > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Obvious things are difficult to teach." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hoooo, ok,
The most important property = the property that is most used. That was my question, cool ;)
2010/3/31 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> Hi Cyrille, _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |