Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2019 posts
|
Is it possible to force MenuModel to display its groups (and group's items) vertically instead of horizontally? The use case is having button palette to click on. Both world menu and subMenu of MenuItemModel render it this way but it is all hidden in the depths of Morphic. Is there any way how to switch this behavior at Spec level? (Or should I make it from scratch?)
Peter |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1320 posts
|
It is not yet supported, sorry :s
Feel free to propose a solution to this :)
Ben On 17 Jul 2014, at 18:24, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2019 posts
|
Well, is this something that should be done on top of the existing solution, or should be Morphic be pushed away and use only Spec? Or just use Morphic for the very last item - Button and the rest with Spec? Currently every Menu[Group|Item]Model has it's morphic counterpart, but I'm not familiar with future of Morphic. Are we trying to get rid of it or just use an abstraction on top of it (Spec)?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1320 posts
|
If you can add some Spec behaviour to match the morphic one, then it’s ok :)
Ben On 17 Jul 2014, at 19:03, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2019 posts
|
But in general, is Morphic planned to be discontinued (fully replaced with Athens?) or just live as the bottom layer? On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Benjamin <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6187 posts
|
On 17 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Peter Uhnák <[hidden email]> wrote:
No. Athens is not a replacement for Morphic, but to the drawing canvas that Morphic (or any graphical object) uses. So, it is in a lower level than Morphic. Esteban
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2019 posts
|
Ok, thank you both. On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |