4.0 to the squeak.org

> Hi guys,
>
> I want to change links to 4.0 on http://www.squeak.org, but 4.0 is
> packaged differently, that is, there is not one .zip ot tar.gz per
> platform consisting both VM and image, as it is the case with current
> 3.10. Can you guys package 4.0 that way too?
>
> Best regards
> Janko
> WebTeam
>
>
>

> On 3/16/2010 10:29 AM, Janko Mivšek wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I want to change links to 4.0 on http://www.squeak.org, but 4.0 is
>> packaged differently, that is, there is not one .zip ot tar.gz per
>> platform consisting both VM and image, as it is the case with current
>> 3.10. Can you guys package 4.0 that way too?
>
> The equivalent links are here:
>
> Windows:
> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/win/Squeak4.0-win32.zip
>
> Mac:
> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/mac/Squeak4.0-mac.zip
>
> Linux:
> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/unix-linux/Squeak-3.10-6.i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
>

> Hi guys,
>
> I want to change links to 4.0 on http://www.squeak.org, but 4.0 is
> packaged differently, that is, there is not one .zip ot tar.gz per
> platform consisting both VM and image, as it is the case with current
> 3.10. Can you guys package 4.0 that way too?
>
> Best regards
> Janko
> WebTeam
>
>
>

> Done!
>
> Only problem is a Linux link, which points to the VM instalation only,
> without images. Shall we package that one as kind of one-click installation?
>
> Janko
>
> On 16. 03. 2010 19:04, Andreas Raab wrote:
>> On 3/16/2010 10:29 AM, Janko Mivšek wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I want to change links to 4.0 on http://www.squeak.org, but 4.0 is
>>> packaged differently, that is, there is not one .zip ot tar.gz per
>>> platform consisting both VM and image, as it is the case with current
>>> 3.10. Can you guys package 4.0 that way too?
>>
>> The equivalent links are here:
>>
>> Windows:
>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/win/Squeak4.0-win32.zip
>>
>> Mac:
>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/mac/Squeak4.0-mac.zip
>>
>> Linux:
>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/unix-linux/Squeak-3.10-6.i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   - Andreas
>>
>>
>
>
>

> Hmm... AFAIK, I built the files I the 4.0 directory just like the 3.10
> directory. The UNIX VMs didn't have a VM packaged with the image.
>
> On Tuesday, March 16, 2010, Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I want to change links to 4.0 on http://www.squeak.org, but 4.0 is
>> packaged differently, that is, there is not one .zip ot tar.gz per
>> platform consisting both VM and image, as it is the case with current
>> 3.10. Can you guys package 4.0 that way too?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Janko
>> WebTeam
>>

> Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
> "Janko" == Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>
> Janko> Another issue, http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/KNOWNISSUES is still refering
> Janko> to 3.10.2. It should be reset to 'There are not known issues' or
> Janko> something, IMHO
>
> Well, there are plenty of known issues, exactly equal to what 3.10.2 had.
>
>
> Yeah! Please write something saying there are TONS of issues and MOST of them are already fixed in trunk and will be released as part of 4.1. And yet again explain that this is a "legal release".
>
> Perhaps in retrospect a version number like "3.99" would have been nice, but hey too late now. :)
>
> regards, Göran
>
>
>

>
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Göran Krampe wrote:
>
>> Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Janko" == Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]> writes:
>>> Janko> Another issue, http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/KNOWNISSUES is still refering
>>> Janko> to 3.10.2. It should be reset to 'There are not known issues' or
>>> Janko> something, IMHO
>>> Well, there are plenty of known issues, exactly equal to what 3.10.2 had.
>>
>> Yeah! Please write something saying there are TONS of issues and MOST of them are already fixed in trunk and will be released as part of 4.1. And yet again explain that this is a "legal release".
>
>
> Agreed.  This should be emphasized until we're confident that nobody new to Squeak (or returning from a hiatus) can be unaware of it.
>
> Also, we should start a discussion about how to wrap up 4.1 ASAP.  I think Bert described it well in another thread:
>         - decide which bugs need to be fixed for 4.1
>         - declare a feature-freeze
>         - iterate between fixing the bugs and producing release-candidates
>         - push the release out so that trunk can again be open to new development
>
> If we could do this within, say, a month, then we could push out announcements to Slashdot, etc. for 4.0 and 4.1 at the same time... this would make a bigger splash than two separate announcements.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
>>
>> Perhaps in retrospect a version number like "3.99" would have been nice, but hey too late now. :)
>>
>> regards, Göran
>>
>>
>
>
>

> All right, y'all win with yer sensibility:) I'll deal with it when I get home.
>
> On Tuesday, March 16, 2010, Josh Gargus <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Göran Krampe wrote:
>>
>>> Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Janko" == Janko Mivšek <[hidden email]> writes:
>>>> Janko> Another issue, http://ftp.squeak.org/4.0/KNOWNISSUES is still refering
>>>> Janko> to 3.10.2. It should be reset to 'There are not known issues' or
>>>> Janko> something, IMHO
>>>> Well, there are plenty of known issues, exactly equal to what 3.10.2 had.
>>>
>>> Yeah! Please write something saying there are TONS of issues and MOST of them are already fixed in trunk and will be released as part of 4.1. And yet again explain that this is a "legal release".
>>
>>
>> Agreed.  This should be emphasized until we're confident that nobody new to Squeak (or returning from a hiatus) can be unaware of it.
>>
>> Also, we should start a discussion about how to wrap up 4.1 ASAP.  I think Bert described it well in another thread:
>>         - decide which bugs need to be fixed for 4.1
>>         - declare a feature-freeze
>>         - iterate between fixing the bugs and producing release-candidates
>>         - push the release out so that trunk can again be open to new development
>>
>> If we could do this within, say, a month, then we could push out announcements to Slashdot, etc. for 4.0 and 4.1 at the same time... this would make a bigger splash than two separate announcements.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Josh
>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps in retrospect a version number like "3.99" would have been nice, but hey too late now. :)
>>>
>>> regards, Göran
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Casey Ransberger
>