4.2 Build 10382 vs. 10160 Test Comparison

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

4.2 Build 10382 vs. 10160 Test Comparison

Casey Ransberger-2
On a Snow Leopard Mac running Squeak 4.2.5beta1U:

10160
=====
2739 run, 2720 passes, 10 expected failures, 8 failures, 1 errors, 0 unexpected passes

10382
=====
2778 run, 2742 passes, 9 expected failures, 26 failures, 1 errors, 0 unexpected passes

So we have 39 more tests than we did before, one less expected failure, and 18 more failures.

Given that we have more new tests than we have new failures, I'm inclined to conclude (perhaps naively, haven't looked at individual failures,) that revision 10382 is the better build. Unless anyone has any objections, I'll be placing the bits in the trunk directory either tonight or tomorrow as time permits.

--
Casey Ransberger