A new Smalltalk mailing-list

> Does that mean the old list
>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-fr
>
> should now be deleted?
>
> Ken
>
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 22:16 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> french Smalltalkers (Squeakers, Pharoers, VWers, GnuSTers, ...) have
>> now a new mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/smalltalk-fr
>>
>> The archive of the mailing-list is available on nabble :
>> http://n3.nabble.com/smalltalk-fr-f471484.html
>>
>> This mailing-list replace the old Squeak-fr mailing list.
>>
>> Best regards,
>
>

> OK, but that's a separate issue.  Deleting the list does not necessarily
> delete the archive, it simply eliminates the membership list and of
> course the ability to receive and relay new messages.  If you are not
> going to use the list any more I really do need to close/delete it, at
> which point I can leave the archive in place or send it to you.
>
> Ken
>
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 09:30 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> No, we can keep the archive for historical purpose ;-)
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Ken Causey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Does that mean the old list
>>>
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-fr
>>>
>>> should now be deleted?
>>>
>>> Ken
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 22:16 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> french Smalltalkers (Squeakers, Pharoers, VWers, GnuSTers, ...) have
>>>> now a new mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/smalltalk-fr
>>>>
>>>> The archive of the mailing-list is available on nabble :
>>>> http://n3.nabble.com/smalltalk-fr-f471484.html
>>>>
>>>> This mailing-list replace the old Squeak-fr mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

> Ken I imagine that serge was not aware of that possibility,  close it and we keep the archive.
>
> Stef
>
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
>
>> OK, but that's a separate issue.  Deleting the list does not necessarily
>> delete the archive, it simply eliminates the membership list and of
>> course the ability to receive and relay new messages.  If you are not
>> going to use the list any more I really do need to close/delete it, at
>> which point I can leave the archive in place or send it to you.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 09:30 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>> No, we can keep the archive for historical purpose ;-)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Ken Causey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Does that mean the old list
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-fr
>>>>
>>>> should now be deleted?
>>>>
>>>> Ken
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 22:16 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> french Smalltalkers (Squeakers, Pharoers, VWers, GnuSTers, ...) have
>>>>> now a new mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/smalltalk-fr
>>>>>
>>>>> The archive of the mailing-list is available on nabble :
>>>>> http://n3.nabble.com/smalltalk-fr-f471484.html
>>>>>
>>>>> This mailing-list replace the old Squeak-fr mailing list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

> OK, but that's a separate issue.  Deleting the list does not necessarily
> delete the archive, it simply eliminates the membership list and of
> course the ability to receive and relay new messages.  If you are not
> going to use the list any more I really do need to close/delete it, at
> which point I can leave the archive in place or send it to you.
>
> Ken
>
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 09:30 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> No, we can keep the archive for historical purpose ;-)
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Ken Causey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> > Does that mean the old list
>> >
>> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-fr
>> >
>> > should now be deleted?
>> >
>> > Ken
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 22:16 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> french Smalltalkers (Squeakers, Pharoers, VWers, GnuSTers, ...) have
>> >> now a new mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/smalltalk-fr
>> >>
>> >> The archive of the mailing-list is available on nabble :
>> >> http://n3.nabble.com/smalltalk-fr-f471484.html
>> >>
>> >> This mailing-list replace the old Squeak-fr mailing list.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>

> Ken, I would like to get copies of all of the list-archives for a
> Magma indexing experiment.  Do you know how I may get those?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Ken Causey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> OK, but that's a separate issue.  Deleting the list does not necessarily
>> delete the archive, it simply eliminates the membership list and of
>> course the ability to receive and relay new messages.  If you are not
>> going to use the list any more I really do need to close/delete it, at
>> which point I can leave the archive in place or send it to you.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 09:30 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>> No, we can keep the archive for historical purpose ;-)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Ken Causey <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > Does that mean the old list
>>> >
>>> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-fr
>>> >
>>> > should now be deleted?
>>> >
>>> > Ken
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 22:16 +0700, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >> french Smalltalkers (Squeakers, Pharoers, VWers, GnuSTers, ...) have
>>> >> now a new mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/smalltalk-fr
>>> >>
>>> >> The archive of the mailing-list is available on nabble :
>>> >> http://n3.nabble.com/smalltalk-fr-f471484.html
>>> >>
>>> >> This mailing-list replace the old Squeak-fr mailing list.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best regards,
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

> On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 19:30 -0500, Chris Muller wrote:
>> Ken, I would like to get copies of all of the list-archives for a
>> Magma indexing experiment.  Do you know how I may get those?
>
> Well first, all public lists have links on their archive index pages to
> download the content on a month by month basis.  If you want the whole
> kit and kaboodle in one lump though, the question becomes how I transfer
> to you about a gigabyte of content.
>
> Ken
>