with squeakmap fixed (normally) :)
Stef |
>>>>> "stéphane" == stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]> writes:
stéphane> with squeakmap fixed (normally) :) Will http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9alpha/ be updated soon? I'm having trouble updating past 7029... getting some DNU errors. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[hidden email]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! |
uhm. We are in beta now.
http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9beta/ or to avoid the alpha/beta/gamma/release issue in the future just use http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9/ which should always point to the directory for the current release status. Ken On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 09:21 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "stéphane" == stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]> writes: > > stéphane> with squeakmap fixed (normally) :) > > Will http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9alpha/ be updated soon? I'm having trouble > updating past 7029... getting some DNU errors. > signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by stéphane ducasse-2
Thank you Stef!
BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize. /Klaus On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:39:57 +0200, stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > with squeakmap fixed (normally) :) > > Stef > > |
On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote: > Thank you Stef! > > BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put > the code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where > it belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize. I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere :)? Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent bugs. And he is right! I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that 10 months ago). Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding why we lost history of certain packages. Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two next weeks are bad for me. Stef |
Hi Stef,
on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:48:08 +0200, you wrote: > On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote: > >> Thank you Stef! >> >> BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the >> code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it >> belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize. > > I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere > :)? Yes, it is attached to new bug report - http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3837 When I filed in the .cs a serious MC/SM error (dunno which one exactly) happend. Does anybody know what to do with this MC/SM problem? It errs with "Could not find version 'SMLoader-gk.24'. Maybe you need to add a repository?" What do I have to do? Has anybody more success when loading the tiny little Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs? Note that it errs after it did many, many times "snapshotting classes, methods, diffing..." (that took minutes). > Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent > bugs. And he is right! NP. > I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that 10 > months ago). Sure, later one always is smarter (same here, called "learning" ;-) /Klaus > Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding why > we lost history of certain packages. > Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two > next weeks are bad for me. > > Stef > > |
Oops! When attempting to reproduce with a fresh image, file
Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs loaded and Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs reproduced the error. I'm sorry, Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs looks like it is corrupted. Stef, can you confirm that Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs works for you (I did SUnit tests before and after, see preamble in the .cs). /Klaus On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:54:03 +0200, Klaus D. Witzel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Stef, > > on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:48:08 +0200, you wrote: >> On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote: >> >>> Thank you Stef! >>> >>> BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the >>> code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it >>> belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize. >> >> I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere >> :)? > > Yes, it is attached to new bug report > > - http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3837 > > When I filed in the .cs a serious MC/SM error (dunno which one exactly) > happend. > > Does anybody know what to do with this MC/SM problem? It errs with > "Could not find version 'SMLoader-gk.24'. Maybe you need to add a > repository?" > > What do I have to do? Has anybody more success when loading the tiny > little Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs? > > Note that it errs after it did many, many times "snapshotting classes, > methods, diffing..." (that took minutes). > >> Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent >> bugs. And he is right! > > NP. > >> I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that 10 >> months ago). > > Sure, later one always is smarter (same here, called "learning" ;-) > > /Klaus > >> Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding >> why we lost history of certain packages. >> Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two >> next weeks are bad for me. >> >> Stef >> >> > > > > |
I have to run now (moving tomorrow).
Stef > Oops! When attempting to reproduce with a fresh image, file > Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs loaded and Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs > reproduced the error. > > I'm sorry, Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs looks like it is corrupted. > > Stef, can you confirm that Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs works for > you (I did SUnit tests before and after, see preamble in the .cs). > > /Klaus What you should do to help is: take latest image load you cs publish a mcz take the latest image load the mcz because if this is not working then we should really issues a cs and republish a mcz + synced image.... Stef PS: with these kinds of changes the order is important. So may be this is a problem there. |
In reply to this post by stéphane ducasse-2
stéphane ducasse wrote:
> > On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote: > >> Thank you Stef! >> >> BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the >> code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it >> belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize. > > > I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere > :)? > > Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent > bugs. And he is right! > I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that > 10 months ago). > Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding > why we lost history of certain packages. > Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two > next weeks are bad for me. > > Stef > http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3405 Includes fix for UUID which is the only client I could find which still had problems. David |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |