Hello!
I have strong personal reasons for leaving github completely, deleting my account, which I will likely do this Friday. As a consequence, I would not be able to continue contributing, and ultimately, maintaining Amber project. In the meantime, Owners group contains Nicolas Petton and Manfred Kröhnert, which are both busy, but can appoint another person to coordination if you find one. I have my personal fork of Amber self-hosted at http://lolg.it/amber/amber.git, so maybe I will continue development if I find time for it, but will likely need to change the name (to be able to use bower/npm with it). Thanks for understanding, Herby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> writes:
> Hello! Hi Herby, > I have strong personal reasons for leaving github completely, deleting > my account, which I will likely do this Friday. > > As a consequence, I would not be able to continue contributing, and > ultimately, maintaining Amber project. In the meantime, Owners group > contains Nicolas Petton and Manfred Kröhnert, which are both busy, but > can appoint another person to coordination if you find one. The way I see it, we have 2 options: 1. You step down as maintainer, and we can try to find a new one 2. We move Amber to another git hosting > I have my personal fork of Amber self-hosted at > http://lolg.it/amber/amber.git, so maybe I will continue development if > I find time for it, but will likely need to change the name (to be able > to use bower/npm with it). Even if you're completely entitled to fork Amber, I would rather not have the community split. Cheers, Nico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. signature.asc (523 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Herby Vojčík
Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> writes:
> I have strong personal reasons for leaving github completely, deleting > my account, which I will likely do this Friday. Would you agree to wait a bit more, to get enough time to get back on our feet? Nico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. signature.asc (523 bytes) Download Attachment |
Sure, it's not a hard deadline.
Dňa 21. marca 2016 13:22:01 CET používateľ Nicolas Petton <[hidden email]> napísal: >Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> writes: > >> I have strong personal reasons for leaving github completely, >deleting >> my account, which I will likely do this Friday. > >Would you agree to wait a bit more, to get enough time to get back on >our feet? > >Nico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Herby Vojčík
Hello Herby, first of all, thank you very much for the excellent work you did so far for Amber. The main problem I see with moving Amber is the visibility which is not really given if we move to a platform smaller than GitHub, GitLab, or BitBucket. But neither of those are an option for you, as you wrote in your blog entry. I hope we can work this out somehow. Best, Manfred On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote: Hello! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Nicolas Petton-3
Nicolas Petton wrote: > Herby Vojčík<[hidden email]> writes: > >> Hello! > > Hi Herby, > >> I have strong personal reasons for leaving github completely, deleting >> my account, which I will likely do this Friday. >> >> As a consequence, I would not be able to continue contributing, and >> ultimately, maintaining Amber project. In the meantime, Owners group >> contains Nicolas Petton and Manfred Kröhnert, which are both busy, but >> can appoint another person to coordination if you find one. > > The way I see it, we have 2 options: > > 1. You step down as maintainer, and we can try to find a new one > 2. We move Amber to another git hosting Egoistically, I'd prefer moving to site I am fine with. OTOH, Github became synonym to open source nowadays, so for a project itself it seems better to stay on Github. At least until Github holds its de facto monopolistic postion (which I think it will lose, but it may take time). >> I have my personal fork of Amber self-hosted at >> http://lolg.it/amber/amber.git, so maybe I will continue development if >> I find time for it, but will likely need to change the name (to be able >> to use bower/npm with it). > > Even if you're completely entitled to fork Amber, I would rather not > have the community split. > > Cheers, > Nico > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
any reason why you want to leave Github ? On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:01 PM Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > any reason why you want to leave Github ? For a political correct Westerner, my motives to do that look ridiculous, even disgusting. So I don't know to make people on the list uncomfortable unnecessarily. If you are really interested, ask privately. Herby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Herby Vojčík wrote: > > > Dimitris Chloupis wrote: >> any reason why you want to leave Github ? > > For a political correct Westerner, my motives to do that look > ridiculous, even disgusting. So I don't know to make people on the s/know/want/ > list uncomfortable unnecessarily. If you are really interested, ask > privately. > > Herby > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Nicolas Petton-3
Excerpts from Nicolas Petton's message of 2016-03-21 13:21:11 +0100:
> The way I see it, we have 2 options: > 1. You step down as maintainer, and we can try to find a new one > 2. We move Amber to another git hosting > > > I have my personal fork of Amber self-hosted at > > http://lolg.it/amber/amber.git, so maybe I will continue development if > > I find time for it, but will likely need to change the name (to be able > > to use bower/npm with it). > > Even if you're completely entitled to fork Amber, I would rather not > have the community split. agreed. unless trying to find a new maintainer is one of the goals of this move, the community should follow the hosting choices of the maintainer. it would be rather odd to fork the project just because of the choice of hosting. personally i applaud any move that strengthens alternatives to github. private hosting is fine, though i'd like to ask if gitlab would be a suitable alternative? apart from that, would there be any objection to heep the github repo running as a mirror if that is desired? greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org secretary beijinglug.org mentor fossasia.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Martin Bähr wrote: > Excerpts from Nicolas Petton's message of 2016-03-21 13:21:11 +0100: >> The way I see it, we have 2 options: >> 1. You step down as maintainer, and we can try to find a new one >> 2. We move Amber to another git hosting >> >>> I have my personal fork of Amber self-hosted at >>> http://lolg.it/amber/amber.git, so maybe I will continue development if >>> I find time for it, but will likely need to change the name (to be able >>> to use bower/npm with it). >> Even if you're completely entitled to fork Amber, I would rather not >> have the community split. > > agreed. unless trying to find a new maintainer is one of the goals of this > move, the community should follow the hosting choices of the maintainer. > > it would be rather odd to fork the project just because of the choice of > hosting. > > personally i applaud any move that strengthens alternatives to github. > > private hosting is fine, though i'd like to ask if gitlab would be a suitable > altern If you mean gitlab cloud offer, I explored all the free alternatives I found (gitlab, bitbucket, assembla) and all lacked in the fundamentals I hold important and which were the main thing that I am finally moving off Github (I would even generalize that, due to social dynamics / Zeitgeist, no cloud provider is ok. For me. Because dangers are too high). If you mean choosing gitlab over gogs for self-hosting, I chose gogs for simplicity and don't want to install the heavier GitLab even if I understand is probably superior as to features. > apart from that, would there be any objection to heep the github repo running > as a mirror if that is desired? > > greetings, martin. Herby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Excerpts from Herby Vojčík's message of 2016-03-21 17:16:45 +0100:
> If you mean gitlab cloud offer, I explored all the free alternatives I found > (gitlab, bitbucket, assembla) and all lacked in the fundamentals I hold > important and which were the main thing that I am finally moving off Github > (I would even generalize that, due to social dynamics / Zeitgeist, no cloud > provider is ok. For me. Because dangers are too high). fair enough. i have no objections to that, though i am curious what dangers you see in cloud-hosting of public code, and also which fundamentals you are missing from the existing services. > If you mean choosing gitlab over gogs for self-hosting, I chose gogs for > simplicity and don't want to install the heavier GitLab even if I understand > is probably superior as to features. no, i didn't mean that, in fact i look forward to an opportunity to see gogs in action. what about this point though? > > apart from that, would there be any objection to keep the github repo running > > as a mirror if that is desired? greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org secretary beijinglug.org mentor fossasia.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Martin Bähr
Martin Bähr <[hidden email]> writes:
> apart from that, would there be any objection to heep the github repo running > as a mirror if that is desired? If the hosting is changed, having a mirror would indeed be great. Nico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. signature.asc (523 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Herby Vojčík
I am more a freedom of speech / expression kind of guy , so fire away , I am definitely interested and I am willing to bet so are most people here. If anything having our main maintainer and contributor happy is very important ;) On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:10 PM Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Martin Bähr
Martin Bähr wrote: > Excerpts from Herby Vojčík's message of 2016-03-21 17:16:45 +0100: >> If you mean gitlab cloud offer, I explored all the free alternatives I found >> (gitlab, bitbucket, assembla) and all lacked in the fundamentals I hold >> important and which were the main thing that I am finally moving off Github >> (I would even generalize that, due to social dynamics / Zeitgeist, no cloud >> provider is ok. For me. Because dangers are too high). > > fair enough. i have no objections to that, though i am curious what dangers you > see in cloud-hosting of public code, and also which fundamentals you are > missing from the existing services. > >> If you mean choosing gitlab over gogs for self-hosting, I chose gogs for >> simplicity and don't want to install the heavier GitLab even if I understand >> is probably superior as to features. > > no, i didn't mean that, in fact i look forward to an opportunity to see gogs in > action. > > what about this point though? >>> apart from that, would there be any objection to keep the github repo running >>> as a mirror if that is desired? Oh, sorry, forgot. Yes, I've got no problem with mirroring (well, maybe in fact, I deeply have, as it gives Github which policies I dislike a reason to exist and keep important a few days more, but I am probably willing to let the mirror be if that's really what people want. But I don't want to use github as repo field in package.json / url registered for bower). That is, I leave Github b/c reason and thus I do not want to support its cause in any way. > greetings, martin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Martin Bähr
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Martin Bähr <[hidden email]> wrote: Excerpts from Herby Vojčík's message of 2016-03-21 17:16:45 +0100: We are using GitLab for the open source code from our Institute which contains a quite big robotics framework (https://gitlab.com/groups/ArmarX). So far we are quite satisfied with the service (which also contains private repositories). GitLab also embraces open source (https://about.gitlab.com/2016/02/09/gitlab-open-strategy/) which helps if you really decide sometime that you want to migrate all your repositories to a privately hosted instance. Best, Manfred > If you mean choosing gitlab over gogs for self-hosting, I chose gogs for You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Amber Smalltalk mailing list
What about Beanstalk? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Martin Bähr
I can pay for the private hosting if needed, already running a couple of VMs on Digitalocean and the cost is not that high.
Pe 21 mar. 2016, la 18:08, Martin Bähr <[hidden email]> a scris: > Excerpts from Nicolas Petton's message of 2016-03-21 13:21:11 +0100: >> The way I see it, we have 2 options: >> 1. You step down as maintainer, and we can try to find a new one >> 2. We move Amber to another git hosting >> >>> I have my personal fork of Amber self-hosted at >>> http://lolg.it/amber/amber.git, so maybe I will continue development if >>> I find time for it, but will likely need to change the name (to be able >>> to use bower/npm with it). >> >> Even if you're completely entitled to fork Amber, I would rather not >> have the community split. > > agreed. unless trying to find a new maintainer is one of the goals of this > move, the community should follow the hosting choices of the maintainer. > > it would be rather odd to fork the project just because of the choice of > hosting. > > personally i applaud any move that strengthens alternatives to github. > > private hosting is fine, though i'd like to ask if gitlab would be a suitable > alternative? > > apart from that, would there be any objection to heep the github repo running > as a mirror if that is desired? > > greetings, martin. > > -- > eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life > -- > chief engineer eKita.co > pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org > secretary beijinglug.org > mentor fossasia.org > foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com > unix sysadmin > Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Mir S.
There's also this hybrid solution I love lately. Based on the Bit Torrent protocol by the company with the same name. It allows for decentralized syncing via p2p. I use it as a great backup/mirror solution across multiple OSs. You can share something R, RW or owner (the pro version(one time payment) lets you manage these permissions on the fly) and each machine archives changed files for as many days as you want. It's encrypted etc etc In conjunction with Git you get a very powerful transparent sync+versioning approach that is hard to match. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by Herby Vojčík
Perhaps it would be better to look for another maintainer.
-- Every time I think of Herbys opinons I get the bad feeling he maybe has when he thinks of our modern world achievements. Open mindedness is at least for me the main requirement to work with someone. Am Montag, 21. März 2016 12:55:42 UTC+1 schrieb Herby: Hello! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |