[ANN] I'm in. Vote.

> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Squeak Oversight Board.
>
> My goals include optional Git integration for the Squeak system (ala Cuis,) as
> well as the load-ability of Morphic 3 when it arrives.
>
> Don't underestimate how much work that's liable to be, though, it isn't going
> to be easy. I'd also very much like to see Monticello actually load-able in
> Cuis, which either means porting ToolBuilder or doing a whole new UI for it.
> Or rewriting the whole mess after the fashion of Andreas Raab's treatment of
> Traits. There are a lot of possibilities about how to do this here, with
> tangible good effects in every direction.
>
> In a paraphrase of Juan's words: Cuis will always be Squeak, and we remain
> forever a part of the Squeak community. In case you thought I was leaving!
>
> There are plenty of reasons not to vote for me. Please review them. Start by
> constraining a Google search on the list archive to my name and just read the
> posts. You'll see quickly that I'm a bit of a hothead. Not always the first to
> get along. I try?
>
> That said: this community has my service, if it is needed, and I'd love to do
> it. I owe all of you that, for what you've given me.
>
> Thank you: all of you.
>
> -- Casey Ransberger

>
>
>
> On 1/16/13 4:04 AM, "Casey Ransberger" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Squeak Oversight Board.
>>
>> My goals include optional Git integration for the Squeak system (ala Cuis,) as
>> well as the load-ability of Morphic 3 when it arrives.
>>
>> Don't underestimate how much work that's liable to be, though, it isn't going
>> to be easy. I'd also very much like to see Monticello actually load-able in
>> Cuis, which either means porting ToolBuilder or doing a whole new UI for it.
>> Or rewriting the whole mess after the fashion of Andreas Raab's treatment of
>> Traits. There are a lot of possibilities about how to do this here, with
>> tangible good effects in every direction.
>>
>> In a paraphrase of Juan's words: Cuis will always be Squeak, and we remain
>> forever a part of the Squeak community. In case you thought I was leaving!
>>
>> There are plenty of reasons not to vote for me. Please review them. Start by
>> constraining a Google search on the list archive to my name and just read the
>> posts. You'll see quickly that I'm a bit of a hothead. Not always the first to
>> get along. I try?
>>
>> That said: this community has my service, if it is needed, and I'd love to do
>> it. I owe all of you that, for what you've given me.
>>
>> Thank you: all of you.
>>
>> -- Casey Ransberger
>
> Like to see you on the Board
> -1
>
> Edgar
>
>
>

> In my drafts I am presently working on an argument about why you should run too. I was actually writing that when I got this from you. I'm fairly irked really so I'm going to trash-icon the eloquent "please run" email and just brusquely say "please run" here instead.
>
> Anyway do what you want man, but given the system we presently have, you've got (one of) my vote(s.)
>
> C
>
> On Jan 16, 2013, at 1:23 AM, "Edgar J. De Cleene" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/16/13 4:04 AM, "Casey Ransberger" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Squeak Oversight Board.
>>>
>>> My goals include optional Git integration for the Squeak system (ala Cuis,) as
>>> well as the load-ability of Morphic 3 when it arrives.
>>>
>>> Don't underestimate how much work that's liable to be, though, it isn't going
>>> to be easy. I'd also very much like to see Monticello actually load-able in
>>> Cuis, which either means porting ToolBuilder or doing a whole new UI for it.
>>> Or rewriting the whole mess after the fashion of Andreas Raab's treatment of
>>> Traits. There are a lot of possibilities about how to do this here, with
>>> tangible good effects in every direction.
>>>
>>> In a paraphrase of Juan's words: Cuis will always be Squeak, and we remain
>>> forever a part of the Squeak community. In case you thought I was leaving!
>>>
>>> There are plenty of reasons not to vote for me. Please review them. Start by
>>> constraining a Google search on the list archive to my name and just read the
>>> posts. You'll see quickly that I'm a bit of a hothead. Not always the first to
>>> get along. I try?
>>>
>>> That said: this community has my service, if it is needed, and I'd love to do
>>> it. I owe all of you that, for what you've given me.
>>>
>>> Thank you: all of you.
>>>
>>> -- Casey Ransberger
>>
>> Like to see you on the Board
>> -1
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>

> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Squeak Oversight Board.
>
> My goals include optional Git integration for the Squeak system (ala Cuis,) as well as the load-ability of Morphic 3 when it arrives.
>
> Don't underestimate how much work that's liable to be, though, it isn't going to be easy. I'd also very much like to see Monticello actually load-able in Cuis, which either means porting ToolBuilder or doing a whole new UI for it. Or rewriting the whole mess after the fashion of Andreas Raab's treatment of Traits. There are a lot of possibilities about how to do this here, with tangible good effects in every direction.
>
> In a paraphrase of Juan's words: Cuis will always be Squeak, and we remain forever a part of the Squeak community. In case you thought I was leaving!
>
> There are plenty of reasons not to vote for me. Please review them. Start by constraining a Google search on the list archive to my name and just read the posts. You'll see quickly that I'm a bit of a hothead. Not always the first to get along. I try?
>
> That said: this community has my service, if it is needed, and I'd love to do it. I owe all of you that, for what you've given me.
>
> Thank you: all of you.
>
> -- Casey Ransberger
>