[ANN] ScriptBook 0.3

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[ANN] ScriptBook 0.3

Chris Cunnington-4
>Tonel seems Pharo, probably the others too.
>How you test if works ?
>Pharo is very different of Squeak this days.

Yup, more good questions. And I’ll point the responsibility elsewhere. I figure if people publish a script, then it probably works.
ScriptBook isn’t going to test anything. I think Tonel works for Squeak. I think I probably goofed with the Bera stuff. Probably Pharo only.
Most of the specs for ScriptBook are soft. I have ideas about importing and exporting Json to disk, etc.

I do know that since scripts fit so well in code and there are so many code repos that a dedicated server for Installer scripts doesn’t make much sense.
I know that I’m building something for myself, because I’ll probably never have any users.
I also know that as a 3rd party developer I never want to have any dealings with the Inbox/Trunk process. I think it made Squeak itself the only application.
And while it’s emphasis on conformity and peer review is good for the core language, its mentality is the opposite of the reason a lot of people (like me) hack in the first place. So if people think that every piece of code is trying to qualify for assimilation, then perhaps that’s an overreach?

Chris

Anthrax  - Got The Time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=be7iNHw8QoQ

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [ANN] ScriptBook 0.3

Edgar De Cleene
Ok
ScriptBook seems a good idea
Maybe the how to have FunSqueak.
I check how to load some and test works.

The base is 5.2 stable release ?

Sent from my iPhone

On 29 Apr 2019, at 10:56, Chris Cunnington <[hidden email]> wrote:

>> Tonel seems Pharo, probably the others too.
>> How you test if works ?
>> Pharo is very different of Squeak this days.
>
> Yup, more good questions. And I’ll point the responsibility elsewhere. I figure if people publish a script, then it probably works.
> ScriptBook isn’t going to test anything. I think Tonel works for Squeak. I think I probably goofed with the Bera stuff. Probably Pharo only.
> Most of the specs for ScriptBook are soft. I have ideas about importing and exporting Json to disk, etc.
>
> I do know that since scripts fit so well in code and there are so many code repos that a dedicated server for Installer scripts doesn’t make much sense.
> I know that I’m building something for myself, because I’ll probably never have any users.
> I also know that as a 3rd party developer I never want to have any dealings with the Inbox/Trunk process. I think it made Squeak itself the only application.
> And while it’s emphasis on conformity and peer review is good for the core language, its mentality is the opposite of the reason a lot of people (like me) hack in the first place. So if people think that every piece of code is trying to qualify for assimilation, then perhaps that’s an overreach?
>
> Chris
>
> Anthrax  - Got The Time
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=be7iNHw8QoQ
>