[ANN] Squeak-3.9b-7043 available

>
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Kernel-ar.16.mcz
>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Morphic-ar.19.mcz
>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-SUnit-ar.11.mcz
>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-MVC-dtl.12.mcz
>>
>> The main change is that some support for menus has been added.
>
> As it happens, I just committed some ToolBuilder fixes.
>
> The main issue is that fix supplied for (http://bugs.impara.de/ 
> view.php?id=3588) is completely bogus. The failures were not  
> expected, they indicated a problem. There were also problems with  
> the tests.
>
> I've committed the following packages, which fix the tests and make  
> ToolBuilder-SUnit pass them. There's still a failing test for  
> Morphic, but I'm not sure what the correct fix is. MVC seems to be  
> badly broken.
>
> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Kernel-cwp.17.mcz
> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-SUnit-cwp.12.mcz
>
> Colin
>

> Are you a package maintainer?
> Should I proceed and load them or is it andreas the boss of these packages?
>
> Stef
>
> On 14 juil. 06, at 18:02, Colin Putney wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Kernel-ar.16.mcz
>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Morphic-ar.19.mcz
>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-SUnit-ar.11.mcz
>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-MVC-dtl.12.mcz
>>>
>>> The main change is that some support for menus has been added.
>>
>> As it happens, I just committed some ToolBuilder fixes.
>>
>> The main issue is that fix supplied for
>> (http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3588) is completely bogus. The
>> failures were not expected, they indicated a problem. There were also
>> problems with the tests.
>>
>> I've committed the following packages, which fix the tests and make
>> ToolBuilder-SUnit pass them. There's still a failing test for Morphic,
>> but I'm not sure what the correct fix is. MVC seems to be badly broken.
>>
>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Kernel-cwp.17.mcz
>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-SUnit-cwp.12.mcz
>>
>> Colin
>>
>
>
>

> stéphane ducasse wrote:
>> How do we proceed?
>
> Go for it. The fixes look good to me.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
>> Are you a package maintainer?
>> Should I proceed and load them or is it andreas the boss of these  
>> packages?
>> Stef
>> On 14 juil. 06, at 18:02, Colin Putney wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Kernel-ar.16.mcz
>>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Morphic-ar.19.mcz
>>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-SUnit-ar.11.mcz
>>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-MVC-dtl.12.mcz
>>>>
>>>> The main change is that some support for menus has been added.
>>>
>>> As it happens, I just committed some ToolBuilder fixes.
>>>
>>> The main issue is that fix supplied for (http://bugs.impara.de/ 
>>> view.php?id=3588) is completely bogus. The failures were not  
>>> expected, they indicated a problem. There were also problems with  
>>> the tests.
>>>
>>> I've committed the following packages, which fix the tests and  
>>> make ToolBuilder-SUnit pass them. There's still a failing test  
>>> for Morphic, but I'm not sure what the correct fix is. MVC seems  
>>> to be badly broken.
>>>
>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-Kernel-cwp.17.mcz
>>> http://squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder/ToolBuilder-SUnit-cwp.12.mcz
>>>
>>> Colin
>>>
>
>

>
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 12:11 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
>
>> How do we proceed?
>> Are you a package maintainer?
>> Should I proceed and load them or is it andreas the boss of these  
>> packages?
>
> Andreas is the boss, although I do try to keep ToolBuilder-SUnit up  
> to date.
>
> Andreas,
>
> The issue with Morphic is MorphicToolBuilderTest>>testAddAction.  
> The test supplies a selector as action, but MorphicToolBuilder  
> seems to want a MessageSend. It could probably work either way, but  
> it's hard to tell what the intention was.
>
> Also, see my fixes to #testButtonInitiallyEnabled and  
> #testButtonInitiallyDisabled.
>
> Colin
>
>
>