After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to
start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book form. I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to contribute and learn about squeak. [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 -- Matthew Fulmer |
Just noticed the mp3 (Masayah - One Dance.mp3) on
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak. I guess someone missed it or is it the new squeak theme tune? -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Matthew Fulmer Sent: Donnerstag, 21. September 2006 11:07 To: [hidden email] Subject: [ANN] Squeak Documentation Project After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book form. I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to contribute and learn about squeak. [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 -- Matthew Fulmer -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.6/453 - Release Date: 20.09.2006 |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Matthew Fulmer a écrit :
> After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to > start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best > way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation > available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book > form. > > I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created > an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better > idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this > amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to > contribute and learn about squeak. > > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 > You can look at our french Wiki : http://community.ofset.org/wiki/Squeak We are using MediaWiki. This is not as big (roughly more than 150 pages) as minnow, but we tried to categorize carefully each of page. -- oooo Dr. Serge Stinckwich OOOOOOOO Université de Caen>CNRS UMR 6072>GREYC>MAD OOESUGOO http://purl.org/net/SergeStinckwich oooooo Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] \ / ## |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Take a look also at my tutorial:
http://www.objectsroot.com/squeak/squeak_tutorial.html Bye bye On 9/21/06, Matthew Fulmer <[hidden email]> wrote: > After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to > start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best > way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation > available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book > form. > > I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created > an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better > idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this > amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to > contribute and learn about squeak. > > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 > > -- > Matthew Fulmer > > -- Software Architect http://www.objectsroot.com/ Software is nothing |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Matthew,
I am writing a (brief) overview of: How to manage code, projects, and releases with Monticello, SqueakSource and SqueakMap. This is "for myself" so not sure how useful it will be. I want to interrupt that work now for until next week, but please remind me in a week or two, when I should be done, if you are interested to include that, I will send you the link. Milan On 2006 September 21 05:06, Matthew Fulmer wrote: > After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to > start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best > way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation > available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book > form. > > I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created > an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better > idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this > amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to > contribute and learn about squeak. > > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Hi Mathew,
This is something the noobs need badly. How about creating a community documentation wiki like the RailsWiki http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails except it should be better organized by a team leader. My thoughts on this... I think it should have two broad sections. 1. Manuals Howtos, tutorials and long winded explanations 2. Language reference The links on ref.home should map to the classes as they are displayed in the system browser. Categories -> Classes -> Methods. (no need for method categories I think) Then for each method there should be a brief explanation followed by example usage. The skeleton can be setup by the team and the community can start filling things in. Team would also do some editing of content...filter out spam etc.(or require login - with email verification. RailsWiki had some bad spam problems). I'll be happy to participate and can even host it on my server. my 2 cents worth. bakki On 9/21/06, Matthew Fulmer <[hidden email]> wrote: > After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to > start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best > way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation > available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book > form. > > I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created > an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better > idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this > amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to > contribute and learn about squeak. > > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 > > -- > Matthew Fulmer > > |
In reply to this post by James Hayes
James Hayes wrote:
> Just noticed the mp3 (Masayah - One Dance.mp3) on > http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak. I guess someone missed it or is it the > new squeak theme tune? > that's strange! I'm listening to it, and I don't hear the connection to Squeak. -- brad fuller sonaural: www.sonaural.com personal: www.bradfuller.com www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2184 |
In reply to this post by Bakki Kudva
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:29:33AM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> Hi Mathew, > > This is something the noobs need badly. How about creating a community > documentation wiki like the RailsWiki > http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails > except it should be better organized by a team leader. I agree with you about the need for a community documentation wiki. However, we already have such a wiki. I think that we should stick with the existing minnow Swiki, rather than make a new one from scratch. The Swiki has a *lot* of information already; it just needs love to put it into a nice hierarchy. I know that Swiki is not the best wiki software at the moment, but it is nearly always better to work with what you have than to start over. And, if Squeak is as good as we say it is, Swiki should be the premiere wiki software in a couple of years. > My thoughts on this... > > I think it should have two broad sections. > 1. Manuals > Howtos, tutorials and long winded explanations > 2. Language reference > The links on ref.home should map to the classes as they are displayed > in the system browser. Categories -> Classes -> Methods. (no need for > method categories I think) Then for each method there should be a > brief explanation followed by example usage. > > The skeleton can be setup by the team and the community can start > filling things in. Team would also do some editing of content...filter > out spam etc.(or require login - with email verification. RailsWiki > had some bad spam problems). The minnow Swiki is a members-only wiki, meaning that you need to ask on IRC for the user name and password. That may need to change, but it is not in my power. > I'll be happy to participate and can even host it on my server. > my 2 cents worth. Thanks. I will need all the help I can get. I put up a voting page to see what the community thinks: should we stick with the minnow Swiki, or should we start over: http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 (at the bottom) -- Matthew Fulmer |
In reply to this post by Bakki Kudva
"Bakki Kudva" <[hidden email]> writes:
> This is something the noobs need badly. How about creating a community > documentation wiki like the RailsWiki > http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails > except it should be better organized by a team leader. > My thoughts on this... > > I think it should have two broad sections. > 1. Manuals > Howtos, tutorials and long winded explanations > 2. Language reference Have you guys looked at the Documentation wiki area we already have? It is linked from the front page of the wiki. http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2983 I'll append its table of contents. In my view, we already have an excellent documentation framework. The place people can help is to actually write these nice articles. -Lex For this page to be meaningful requires the effort of the whole Squeak comunity. To contribute see How to help us document Squeak. Thanks, the management. Introduction * About Squeak o The History of Squeak + The Early History of Smalltalk by Alan C. Kay + Travels with Smalltalk by Dave Thomas traces the larger history of Smalltalk up to the 90s + Quotes and anecdotes + Squeak's Place in the Universe o Features o Supported platforms o License, see Squeak-L * Squeak and Smalltalk Basics o Smalltalk: A White Paper Overview by Harry Porter o Smalltalk overview o ANSI Smalltalk: the standard. o Learn Smalltalk o Squeak's programming language: Smalltalk and Squeak's dialect of it. o The Squeak and Smalltalk Glossary Getting started * Squeak FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions about Squeak * Reporting Bugs and Fixes * Squeak Mailing List * Obtaining Squeak o Downloading Squeak * Installing Squeak o How do I install Squeak for Windows? o How do I install Squeak for Mac? o Download for Unix + Squeak for Debian Users o BSD * Learning Squeak o Introductions to Squeak o Self Study course for learning Squeak. o The Newbie page o Squeak Cookbook %Gâ%@ HowTo o Squeak for Non-Native Speakers (pdf), by Noel Rappin of EchoBridge. o Squeak, the Smalltalk of the 21st. Century, by Germán Arduino. Using Squeak * Interacting with Squeak o Squeak User Interface: working with Squeak's interface o Morphic: Squeak's newer graphics framework o MVC: The older graphics framework + Forms, Views, and Windows + The FormEditor o Fonts in Squeak * Configuring and Tuning o User Preferences * Installing Applications o SqueakMap: Add Packages to your Image o SqueakMap Usage HOWTO: How to work with SqueakMap and the Package o Monticello concurrent versioning system for Squeak code. * Printing o Postscript support * Storage o Introduction to ImageSegments #3 o Files and Directories * Localization o Squeak Localization o Multilingual Support * Multimedia o Sound and music o Video o Squeak-specific media o 3D o Presentation authoring o Presentaciones en Squeak, by Germán Arduino. This article is in Spanish, translators are welcomed! * Networking o Internet integration o Mail + Celeste o World Wide Web + Swiki + Comanche + SmallWiki o Scamper * Miscellaneous o Squeak Threading Model o FFI Programming with Squeak * Introduction o Basic Squeak Development Tools: %Gâ%@ Browsers, Workspaces, Inspectors, etc. o SUnit S-Unit Testing Framework o Hello World programs %Gâ%@ Ways of how to make a simple 'Hello World' Application o Dependencies o Monticello concurrent versioning system for Squeak code. * Programming with the Squeak User Interface o BitBlt o see also Using Squeak o Block Closures %Gâ%@ Blocks in Squeak o Processes o Exception Handling * Storage o Introduction to ImageSegments #3 o Files * Networking Inside Squeak * System Documentation * The Squeak Image * The Virtual Machine o VM Command Line Options o The Interpreter o Simulating the Interpreter: running the Squeak VM from within Squeak. o The Object Memory (the heap) o The Squeak Garbage Collector o Porting Squeak Bugs and Fixes * Reporting Bugs and Fixes * Bug Fixes Archive * Known Bugs * ClassDescription Appendices * Bibliography o Squeak books in print %Gâ%@ Books about Squeak o Smalltalk books %Gâ%@ Books about Smalltalk in general o Videos and Presentations * Resources on the Internet o http://www.squeak.org/ %Gâ%@ The official Squeak Homepage o http://www.smalltalk.org/ %Gâ%@ The official Smalltalk Homepage o http://www.whysmalltalk.com/ %Gâ%@ huge collection of Tutorials, HowTos and much more about Smalltalk * Also see: o the class comments inside your Squeak image, o the available projects on various Super Swikis, and o the package descriptions in SqueakMap Miscellaneous - orphaned * Older Front Page Links o Bibliography Online papers on Squeak, Smalltalk, and object-oriented programming - very extensive! o Modules - documentation about the modules/packages/repository system that was added to 3.3. (now obsolete!) o Squeak on Handhelds: running Squeak on machines like the iPaq. o Uncategorized Essays: miscellanous documentation that doesn't fit elsewhere. o Essays Wanted %Gâ%@ essays that it would be wonderful to have around, but which aren't. o Cash for Documentation %Gâ%@ help support the Squeak community by bidding for needed documentation * Cleanup - to be moved? o Cleanup/Enhancement Projects o Documentation o Morphic Cleanup Project (MCP) o EventRecorderMorph o Squeak Documentation Project (SDP) o Factoring Squeak 3.4+ into Packages o Finding Stewards for Packages |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Matthew Fulmer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:29:33AM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote: > >> Hi Mathew, >> >> This is something the noobs need badly. How about creating a community >> documentation wiki like the RailsWiki >> http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails >> except it should be better organized by a team leader. >> > > I agree with you about the need for a community documentation > wiki. However, we already have such a wiki. I think that we > should stick with the existing minnow Swiki, rather than make a > new one from scratch. The Swiki has a *lot* of information > already; it just needs love to put it into a nice hierarchy. I > know that Swiki is not the best wiki software at the moment, > but it is nearly always better to work with what you have than > to start over. And, if Squeak is as good as we say it is, Swiki > should be the premiere wiki software in a couple of years > One option would be to select the appropriate content on minnow, pruned/edit/improve it and place it in a new wiki (Pier Wiki?) in the appropriate place. Maybe this "appropriate" place is an already made hierarchy or however it is decided to organize the new wiki. (personally, I'd like to see a dynamic mind map using connectors package with seaside. Something like this: http://www.thebrain.com/ - you'll need java plugin enabled to view) The benefit to the editor(s) is that he gets to read and do a little learning while editing into the new wiki. Is there a documentation team? |
Hi Brad-- > Is there a documentation team? It looks like there isn't, officially[1]. I guess that's about to change, cool! -C [1] http://www.squeak.org/Community/Teams -- Craig Latta http://netjam.org/resume |
In reply to this post by Lex Spoon
Hi Lex, Mathew,
I have seen the swiki and perhaps my choice of words "creating a wiki" was wrong and misleading. I do think that the language ref particularly needs 'the love' Brad is talking about. I have found that the php reference was the best I've ever used. http://www.php.net/manual/en/ The reason is that there is a quick way to find the info on the particular php function, where you find its description, example code and usage notes from users. We could do something similar. However I feel that most smalltalkers first get familiar (newbies like me) with the system browser while exploring code and so if the index page of the ref manual is organized the same way then one could quickly find a class>>method page and the information there could follow the same format for all methods: Description:....................... Example code: ................... User notes: ...................... This could use some nice css to box each section in a squeak like frame with different colors etc. WHy not emulate and improve upon something that works really well? Seaside halos already exposes the object heirarchy. Perhaps this could be extended to be the documentation engine with the code edit capability ofcourse turned off? -bakki On 21 Sep 2006 17:58:23 +0200, Lex Spoon <[hidden email]> wrote: > Have you guys looked at the Documentation wiki area we already have? > It is linked from the front page of the wiki. > > http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2983 |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
This is one of the problems with Smalltalk in general, as I see it.
There's a ton of documentation available on Smalltalk, not just Squeak. But when you're starting out, you don't want all that. You need a straight forward, single, starting point to get going. The stic group, through the smalltalk-central.com site is trying to centralize a lot of Smalltalk information into one place for people curious about Smalltalk. Right now, in the tutorials sections on smalltalk-central.com, there are inumerable tutorials on squeak and aspects of squeak. Where does a newbie start? It would be nice to get a squeak tutorial that is concise, well-written, well-formatted and designed for the beginner. If nothing else, so he doesn't have to wade through 50 tutorials to get started. Eric On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:06 AM, Matthew Fulmer wrote: > After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to > start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best > way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation > available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book > form. > > I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created > an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better > idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this > amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to > contribute and learn about squeak. > > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 > > -- > Matthew Fulmer > |
In reply to this post by Bakki Kudva
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:43:37PM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> Hi Lex, Mathew, > > I have seen the swiki and perhaps my choice of words "creating a wiki" > was wrong and misleading. I do think that the language ref > particularly needs 'the love' Brad is talking about. I have found that > the php reference was the best I've ever used. > http://www.php.net/manual/en/ > The reason is that there is a quick way to find the info on the > particular php function, where you find its description, example code > and usage notes from users. We could do something similar. However I > feel that most smalltalkers first get familiar (newbies like me) with > the system browser while exploring code and so if the index page of > the ref manual is organized the same way then one could quickly find a > class>>method page and the information there could follow the same > format for all methods: > > Description:....................... > Example code: ................... > User notes: ...................... > > This could use some nice css to box each section in a squeak like > frame with different colors etc. > > WHy not emulate and improve upon something that works really well? This is exactly what I want to build, but for Squeak/Smalltalk > Seaside halos already exposes the object heirarchy. Perhaps this could > be extended to be the documentation engine with the code edit > capability ofcourse turned off? The more automatic this process can be, the better. I may look into it later, but for now, I want to compile a comprehensive Squeak documentation index so that we have a place to start. So far, the Swiki seems like the best place to do this, however, I am not familiar with all the technology that squeak offers in this area. I have zero experience with Seaside. If Seaside is better suited to the documentation project, we should definitely use it. > On 21 Sep 2006 17:58:23 +0200, Lex Spoon <[hidden email]> wrote: > >Have you guys looked at the Documentation wiki area we already have? > >It is linked from the front page of the wiki. > > > > http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2983 Yes, I have. I plan to use it too. There are frameworks already in place for doing what I want to do, we just need to make use of them. -- Matthew Fulmer |
In reply to this post by Eric Winger
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:44:27AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> This is one of the problems with Smalltalk in general, as I see it. > There's a ton of documentation available on Smalltalk, not just Squeak. > But when you're starting out, you don't want all that. You need a > straight forward, single, starting point to get going. That is what I hope to create. > The stic group, through the smalltalk-central.com site is trying to > centralize a lot of Smalltalk information into one place for people > curious about Smalltalk. Should the squeak documentation project focus it's efforts at that site, rather than the Swiki? > Right now, in the tutorials sections on smalltalk-central.com, there > are inumerable tutorials on squeak and aspects of squeak. Where does a > newbie start? > > It would be nice to get a squeak tutorial that is concise, > well-written, well-formatted and designed for the beginner. If nothing > else, so he doesn't have to wade through 50 tutorials to get started. To begin, I want to create a comprehensive index of all existing Squeak-applicable documentation. That way, we know what we can plagiarize and what we will need to write from scratch. Of course, I do not want to use someones work without permission, but I do not know of a categorical index to all the available documentation. I have created a template index, and I will begin creating content there soon: http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5871 Once that progresses, we can obtain permission to use those documents that are available and re-create them in the form of a comprehensive Squeak Reference Manual and a Tutorial. That is my road map. -- Matthew Fulmer |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Cool effort. Please do it!
On 21 sept. 06, at 11:06, Matthew Fulmer wrote: > After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to > start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best > way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation > available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book > form. > > I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created > an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better > idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this > amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to > contribute and learn about squeak. > > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak > [1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 > > -- > Matthew Fulmer > |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
This is a reminder that the Georgia Tech Swiki Support is going away, or has this changed recently? See the following email from Mark Guzdial, dated jan 25, 2006.
I see that the SqueakSwiki link at <http://www.squeak.org> still points to <http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/Squeak>. Has the phasing out been planned for? What happens in case of disasterous loss? Ken At 9:09 AM -0500 1/25/06, Mark Guzdial wrote: >Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:09:12 -0500 >From: Mark Guzdial <[hidden email]> >Subject: [croquet-user] Swiki Support at GT phasing out ><> > >Folks, the support for Swikis at Georgia Tech is starting to be phased out. We have no funding to continue supporting the servers, and the GT administration isn't willing to support them. (Not when they have such powerful and useful software as WebCT already purchased!) > >This doesn't mean that anything is going away soon, but it does mean that [hidden email] will be read less frequently and responded to more slowly, and if there is a catastrophic failure on minnow (e.g., disk failure), we may not be able to bring it back (e.g., no money to buy a new disk). > >The Squeak.org folks are already working to copy Squeak Swiki off our servers. The Croquet community should probably be thinking similarly about longterm plans. Again, there's no immediate need to move off, but some migration plans should be in thinking stage. > >Sorry about this, everyone. > Mark --------------------------- >Date: 21 Sep 2006 17:58:23 +0200 >From: Lex Spoon <[hidden email]> >Subject: Re: [ANN] Squeak Documentation Project >To: [hidden email] >Message-ID: <[hidden email]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > >"Bakki Kudva" <[hidden email]> writes: >> This is something the noobs need badly. How about creating a community >> documentation wiki like the RailsWiki >> http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails >> except it should be better organized by a team leader. >> My thoughts on this... >> >> I think it should have two broad sections. >> 1. Manuals >> Howtos, tutorials and long winded explanations >> 2. Language reference > >Have you guys looked at the Documentation wiki area we already have? >It is linked from the front page of the wiki. > > http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2983 > > >I'll append its table of contents. In my view, we already have an >excellent documentation framework. The place people can help is to >actually write these nice articles. > > >-Lex |
Nothing from what I know and it would be good to migrate it on the
squeakfoundation machines. Stef On 21 sept. 06, at 22:13, Ken G. Brown wrote: > This is a reminder that the Georgia Tech Swiki Support is going > away, or has this changed recently? See the following email from > Mark Guzdial, dated jan 25, 2006. > I see that the SqueakSwiki link at <http://www.squeak.org> still > points to <http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/Squeak>. Has the phasing out > been planned for? What happens in case of disasterous loss? > Ken > > At 9:09 AM -0500 1/25/06, Mark Guzdial wrote: >> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:09:12 -0500 >> From: Mark Guzdial <[hidden email]> >> Subject: [croquet-user] Swiki Support at GT phasing out >> <> >> >> Folks, the support for Swikis at Georgia Tech is starting to be >> phased out. We have no funding to continue supporting the >> servers, and the GT administration isn't willing to support them. >> (Not when they have such powerful and useful software as WebCT >> already purchased!) >> >> This doesn't mean that anything is going away soon, but it does >> mean that [hidden email] will be read less frequently >> and responded to more slowly, and if there is a catastrophic >> failure on minnow (e.g., disk failure), we may not be able to >> bring it back (e.g., no money to buy a new disk). >> >> The Squeak.org folks are already working to copy Squeak Swiki off >> our servers. The Croquet community should probably be thinking >> similarly about longterm plans. Again, there's no immediate need >> to move off, but some migration plans should be in thinking stage. >> >> Sorry about this, everyone. >> Mark > > --------------------------- >> Date: 21 Sep 2006 17:58:23 +0200 >> From: Lex Spoon <[hidden email]> >> Subject: Re: [ANN] Squeak Documentation Project >> To: [hidden email] >> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> >> "Bakki Kudva" <[hidden email]> writes: >>> This is something the noobs need badly. How about creating a >>> community >>> documentation wiki like the RailsWiki >>> http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails >>> except it should be better organized by a team leader. >>> My thoughts on this... >>> >>> I think it should have two broad sections. >>> 1. Manuals >>> Howtos, tutorials and long winded explanations >>> 2. Language reference >> >> Have you guys looked at the Documentation wiki area we already have? >> It is linked from the front page of the wiki. >> >> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2983 >> >> >> I'll append its table of contents. In my view, we already have an >> excellent documentation framework. The place people can help is to >> actually write these nice articles. >> >> >> -Lex > > |
In reply to this post by Ken G. Brown
Does anybody have any info on this ?
Karl Ken G. Brown skrev: > This is a reminder that the Georgia Tech Swiki Support is going away, or has this changed recently? See the following email from Mark Guzdial, dated jan 25, 2006. > I see that the SqueakSwiki link at <http://www.squeak.org> still points to <http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/Squeak>. Has the phasing out been planned for? What happens in case of disasterous loss? > Ken > > At 9:09 AM -0500 1/25/06, Mark Guzdial wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:09:12 -0500 >> From: Mark Guzdial <[hidden email]> >> Subject: [croquet-user] Swiki Support at GT phasing out >> <> >> >> Folks, the support for Swikis at Georgia Tech is starting to be phased out. We have no funding to continue supporting the servers, and the GT administration isn't willing to support them. (Not when they have such powerful and useful software as WebCT already purchased!) >> >> This doesn't mean that anything is going away soon, but it does mean that [hidden email] will be read less frequently and responded to more slowly, and if there is a catastrophic failure on minnow (e.g., disk failure), we may not be able to bring it back (e.g., no money to buy a new disk). >> >> The Squeak.org folks are already working to copy Squeak Swiki off our servers. The Croquet community should probably be thinking similarly about longterm plans. Again, there's no immediate need to move off, but some migration plans should be in thinking stage. >> >> Sorry about this, everyone. >> Mark >> > > --------------------------- > >> Date: 21 Sep 2006 17:58:23 +0200 >> From: Lex Spoon <[hidden email]> >> Subject: Re: [ANN] Squeak Documentation Project >> To: [hidden email] >> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> >> "Bakki Kudva" <[hidden email]> writes: >> >>> This is something the noobs need badly. How about creating a community >>> documentation wiki like the RailsWiki >>> http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails >>> except it should be better organized by a team leader. >>> My thoughts on this... >>> >>> I think it should have two broad sections. >>> 1. Manuals >>> Howtos, tutorials and long winded explanations >>> 2. Language reference >>> >> Have you guys looked at the Documentation wiki area we already have? >> It is linked from the front page of the wiki. >> >> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2983 >> >> >> I'll append its table of contents. In my view, we already have an >> excellent documentation framework. The place people can help is to >> actually write these nice articles. >> >> >> -Lex >> > > > > |
In reply to this post by Tapple Gao
Excellent. This really needs to be done desperately. I would be interested
in any help I can offer. Is there a list somewhere of who all will be involved? We need to get everyone together and lay out what gets documented first cut, and probably try to make a cut at the chapters so the documentation can be done concurrently. >From: Matthew Fulmer <[hidden email]> >Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers >list<[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: [ANN] Squeak Documentation Project >Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:06:59 -0700 > >After some discussion with bmp on #squeak, I have decided to >start writing a tutorial on squeak. bmp told me that the best >way to proceed with this task is to take all the documentation >available on the swiki [1] and massively refactor it into book >form. > >I am a squeak noob, and I cannot do this alone. I have created >an outline of my proposal [2] on the swiki. If you have a better >idea, please say so. I really want to get involved with this >amazing project. This will be a great way for us noobs to >contribute and learn about squeak. > >[1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak >[1] http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5870 > >-- >Matthew Fulmer > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |