Folks, here you have the official (no Edgardese) version hand made. I just made for myself and people in squeakros, hope could be useful to somebody. Edgar
|
Edgar, what is this?
I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak. Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released. This might just be an updated trunk image..? On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote: > http://squeakros.org/Squeak4.5-13316.zip > > Folks, here you have the official (no Edgardese) version hand made. > I just made for myself and people in squeakros, hope could be useful to > somebody. > > Edgar > > > |
El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió: >Edgar, what is this? > >I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an >ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak. > >Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released. This might just be an >updated trunk image..? Try to clarify. People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating to last trunk raise some Monticello windows. So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand updated .image. I do not claim this is ³official². I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different. Sorry if I so some wrong Edgar |
I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from
(system integrity is fine again after a series of commits) from http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ to http://ftp.squeak.org/4.5alpha/ For convenience. Last one is June 2013. Edgar did this in the past for earlier versions. --Hannes P.S. And the existence of http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ should be announced from time to time or be easy to spot on www.squeak.org On 11/2/13, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió: > >>Edgar, what is this? >> >>I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an >>ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak. >> >>Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released. This might just be an >>updated trunk image..? > > Try to clarify. > > People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating to > last trunk raise some Monticello windows. > So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand > updated .image. > I do not claim this is ³official². > I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different. > > Sorry if I so some wrongŠ > > Edgar > > > > |
On 3 November 2013 00:41, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from > (system integrity is fine again after a series of commits) from > > http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ > > to > > http://ftp.squeak.org/4.5alpha/ > > For convenience. Last one is June 2013. Until the current issue around tests is resolved (the hanging that might be happening in the Monticello tests: see recent mails on the topic), we can't release anything from CI. I can't reproduce the problem on my Windows machine. But otherwise, yes, ideally the ReleaseSqueakTrunk job would, on a successful build, give us something we could manually vet and then publish on ftp.squeak.org. frank > Edgar did this in the past for earlier versions. > > --Hannes > > > P.S. And the existence of > http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ > > should be announced from time to time or be easy to spot on www.squeak.org > > > > > On 11/2/13, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> >> El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió: >> >>>Edgar, what is this? >>> >>>I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an >>>ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak. >>> >>>Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released. This might just be an >>>updated trunk image..? >> >> Try to clarify. >> >> People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating to >> last trunk raise some Monticello windows. >> So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand >> updated .image. >> I do not claim this is ³official². >> I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different. >> >> Sorry if I so some wrongŠ >> >> Edgar >> >> >> >> > |
In reply to this post by Hannes Hirzel
www.squeak.org is really in need of some updates. Is there anyone active at all in the web team ? Karl
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:41 AM, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from |
Yes, besides info lacking about build.squeak.org
the download page still references a 4.1 All-in-one download for Seaside instead of referring to http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/seaside/Seaside-3.0.8-AllInOne.zip And one hierarchy level higher there is http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/Squeak-4.4-All-in-One.zip which seems to be older --Hannes On 11/3/13, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote: > www.squeak.org is really in need of some updates. Is there anyone active at > all in the web team ? > > Karl > > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:41 AM, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from >> (system integrity is fine again after a series of commits) from >> >> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ >> >> to >> >> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.5alpha/ >> >> For convenience. Last one is June 2013. >> >> Edgar did this in the past for earlier versions. >> >> --Hannes >> >> >> P.S. And the existence of >> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ >> >> should be announced from time to time or be easy to spot on >> www.squeak.org >> >> >> >> >> On 11/2/13, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió: >> > >> >>Edgar, what is this? >> >> >> >>I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an >> >>ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak. >> >> >> >>Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released. This might just be an >> >>updated trunk image..? >> > >> > Try to clarify. >> > >> > People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating >> > to >> > last trunk raise some Monticello windows. >> > So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand >> > updated .image. >> > I do not claim this is ³official². >> > I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different. >> > >> > Sorry if I so some wrongŠ >> > >> > Edgar >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > |
The community would be very grateful for one of you to help us address
these issues. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:38 PM, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Yes, besides info lacking about build.squeak.org > > the download page still references a 4.1 All-in-one download for > Seaside instead of referring to > > http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/seaside/Seaside-3.0.8-AllInOne.zip > > And one hierarchy level higher there is > http://ftp.squeak.org/4.4/Squeak-4.4-All-in-One.zip > which seems to be older > > --Hannes > > On 11/3/13, karl ramberg <[hidden email]> wrote: >> www.squeak.org is really in need of some updates. Is there anyone active at >> all in the web team ? >> >> Karl >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:41 AM, H. Hirzel <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> I think this shows the need to copy a somewhat stable version from >>> (system integrity is fine again after a series of commits) from >>> >>> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ >>> >>> to >>> >>> http://ftp.squeak.org/4.5alpha/ >>> >>> For convenience. Last one is June 2013. >>> >>> Edgar did this in the past for earlier versions. >>> >>> --Hannes >>> >>> >>> P.S. And the existence of >>> http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/ >>> >>> should be announced from time to time or be easy to spot on >>> www.squeak.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/2/13, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > El 11/2/13, 5:46 PM, "Chris Muller" <[hidden email]> escribió: >>> > >>> >>Edgar, what is this? >>> >> >>> >>I think your subject line could confuse people by appearing to be an >>> >>ANNouncement of an "official" release of Squeak. >>> >> >>> >>Just to be clear, Squeak 4.5 is not released. This might just be an >>> >>updated trunk image..? >>> > >>> > Try to clarify. >>> > >>> > People on my group who attend Smalltalks2013 complains about updating >>> > to >>> > last trunk raise some Monticello windows. >>> > So as I follow trunk closely for my use is easier to me made a hand >>> > updated .image. >>> > I do not claim this is ³official². >>> > I said should be the same as CI builds as I do no put any different. >>> > >>> > Sorry if I so some wrongŠ >>> > >>> > Edgar >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |