You have my vote for this.
Cheers Herbert -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Ron Teitelbaum <[hidden email]> Datum: 31.01.2013 22:38 (GMT+01:00) An: 'The general-purpose Squeak developers list' <[hidden email]> Betreff: RE: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!! Hi All, At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote. Thoughts? Ron Teitelbaum > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:squeak-dev- > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Herbert König > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!! > > Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge: > > 98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort of > mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get on the > browser and VOTE. > > > > Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll > (not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such art that you > think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of your life > desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish to > avoid voting? I think not. > > > > > frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such threats > hanging above my head... > > Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and vote! > > Cheers, > > Herbert > |
I would do it the same way as the years before. Sending out ballots once and then see what happens. This way you can compare this election with the ones before. A decreasing number of voters might be a hint for the board to come to think more about community building efforts beside the technical and administrative stuff. Alex2013/2/1 Herbert König <[hidden email]>
|
2013/2/1 Alexander Lazarević <[hidden email]>:
> I would do it the same way as the years before. Sending out ballots once and > then see what happens. This way you can compare this election with the ones > before. A decreasing number of voters might be a hint for the board to come > to think more about community building efforts beside the technical and > administrative stuff. > +1 |
In reply to this post by Alexander Lazarević
Hi All, The responses were mixed. Since by default we only send the ballots once, that will continue. Thank you everyone for your feedback. +1 for more community development. Ron From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Alexander Lazarevic I would do it the same way as the years before. Sending out ballots once and then see what happens. This way you can compare this election with the ones before. A decreasing number of voters might be a hint for the board to come to think more about community building efforts beside the technical and administrative stuff. Alex 2013/2/1 Herbert König <[hidden email]> You have my vote for this. Cheers Herbert
|
Thanks, Ron. -C -- Craig Latta www.netjam.org/resume +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS) |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |