About System default unimplemented calls

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

About System default unimplemented calls

Edgar J. De Cleene
Pavel Krivanek puso en su mail :

> - we should check SystemNavigation default allUnimplementedCalls

I do in several images with this result:

 Squeak3.7-5989-basic 182
 Squeak3.8-6665 (basic) 185
 Squeak3.9g-7061 195
 MinimalMorphic 232

And most are the same
Create a Excel and text info for this , too big for share.

What now ?

Edgar


__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About System default unimplemented calls

Pavel Krivanek
On 11/9/06, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 11/9/06, Edgar J. De Cleene <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Pavel Krivanek puso en su mail :
> >
> > > - we should check SystemNavigation default allUnimplementedCalls
> >
> > I do in several images with this result:
> >
> >  Squeak3.7-5989-basic 182
> >  Squeak3.8-6665 (basic) 185
> >  Squeak3.9g-7061 195
> >  MinimalMorphic 232
> >
> > And most are the same
> > Create a Excel and text info for this , too big for share.
> >
> > What now ?
> >
> > Edgar
>
> Hi Edgar,
>
> we have to look at all methods where this unimplemented calls are used
> and solve it (modify or remove this methods, implement called methods
> again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous and may produce
> accidental DNUs.
>
> We should do that in the KernelImage too...
>
> -- Pavel

Hi Edgar,

we have to look at all methods where this unimplemented calls are used
and solve it (modify or remove this methods, implement called methods
again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous and may produce
accidental DNUs.

We should do that in the KernelImage too...

-- Pavel

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About System default unimplemented calls

Jerome Peace
In reply to this post by Edgar J. De Cleene
About System default unimplemented calls

Hi Pavel, Hi Edgar

Check out:
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=4544

for tools for splitting up the unimplemented list.

I've been working with 3.9 in mind but the tool ( a
workspace doit) can easily be adapted to the kernel
image.

I've also been tackling the problem of removing some
of the unimplemented callers.
Searching Mantis for 'unimp' will find a good deal of
them. Alternately, filtering for reporter 'wiz' will
uncover all of these fixes plus all my other reports.

Yours in service, --Jerome Peace


>Pavel Krivanek squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz
>Thu Nov 9 11:26:33 UTC 2006
>
>On 11/9/06, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek at
gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/9/06, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at
yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
>> > Pavel Krivanek puso en su mail :
>> >
>> > > - we should check SystemNavigation default
allUnimplementedCalls

>> >
>> > I do in several images with this result:
>> >
>> >  Squeak3.7-5989-basic 182
>> >  Squeak3.8-6665 (basic) 185
>> >  Squeak3.9g-7061 195
>> >  MinimalMorphic 232
>> >
>> > And most are the same
>> > Create a Excel and text info for this , too big
for share.
>> >
>> > What now ?
>> >
>> > Edgar
>>
>> Hi Edgar,
>>
>> we have to look at all methods where this
unimplemented calls are used
>> and solve it (modify or remove this methods,
implement called methods
>> again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous
and may produce
>> accidental DNUs.
>>
>> We should do that in the KernelImage too...
>>
>> -- Pavel
>
>Hi Edgar,
>
>we have to look at all methods where this
unimplemented calls are used
>and solve it (modify or remove this methods,
implement called methods
>again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous and
may produce
>accidental DNUs.
>
>We should do that in the KernelImage too...
>
>-- Pavel
>
>


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About System default unimplemented calls

Pavel Krivanek
Hi Jerome

On 11/10/06, Jerome Peace <[hidden email]> wrote:

> About System default unimplemented calls
>
> Hi Pavel, Hi Edgar
>
> Check out:
> http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=4544
>
> for tools for splitting up the unimplemented list.
>
> I've been working with 3.9 in mind but the tool ( a
> workspace doit) can easily be adapted to the kernel
> image.
>
> I've also been tackling the problem of removing some
> of the unimplemented callers.
> Searching Mantis for 'unimp' will find a good deal of
> them. Alternately, filtering for reporter 'wiz' will
> uncover all of these fixes plus all my other reports.
>
> Yours in service, --Jerome Peace

I was working on new unimplemented calls that were added by
MinimalMorphic and I decreased it to 10 calls so now I have 105
unimplemented calls in this image. I will publish it later.

-- Pavel

>
> >Pavel Krivanek squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz
> >Thu Nov 9 11:26:33 UTC 2006
> >
> >On 11/9/06, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek at
> gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/9/06, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at
> yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
> >> > Pavel Krivanek puso en su mail :
> >> >
> >> > > - we should check SystemNavigation default
> allUnimplementedCalls
> >> >
> >> > I do in several images with this result:
> >> >
> >> >  Squeak3.7-5989-basic 182
> >> >  Squeak3.8-6665 (basic) 185
> >> >  Squeak3.9g-7061 195
> >> >  MinimalMorphic 232
> >> >
> >> > And most are the same
> >> > Create a Excel and text info for this , too big
> for share.
> >> >
> >> > What now ?
> >> >
> >> > Edgar
> >>
> >> Hi Edgar,
> >>
> >> we have to look at all methods where this
> unimplemented calls are used
> >> and solve it (modify or remove this methods,
> implement called methods
> >> again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous
> and may produce
> >> accidental DNUs.
> >>
> >> We should do that in the KernelImage too...
> >>
> >> -- Pavel
> >
> >Hi Edgar,
> >
> >we have to look at all methods where this
> unimplemented calls are used
> >and solve it (modify or remove this methods,
> implement called methods
> >again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous and
> may produce
> >accidental DNUs.
> >
> >We should do that in the KernelImage too...
> >
> >-- Pavel
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: About System default unimplemented calls

Edgar J. De Cleene
In reply to this post by Jerome Peace
Jerome Peace puso en su mail :

> About System default unimplemented calls
>
> Hi Pavel, Hi Edgar
>
> Check out:
> http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=4544
>
> for tools for splitting up the unimplemented list.
>
> I've been working with 3.9 in mind but the tool ( a
> workspace doit) can easily be adapted to the kernel
> image.
>
> I've also been tackling the problem of removing some
> of the unimplemented callers.
> Searching Mantis for 'unimp' will find a good deal of
> them. Alternately, filtering for reporter 'wiz' will
> uncover all of these fixes plus all my other reports.
>
> Yours in service, --Jerome Peace
Thanks Jerome.

Pavel Krivanek puso en su mail :

> I was working on new unimplemented calls that were added by
> MinimalMorphic and I decreased it to 10 calls so now I have 105
> unimplemented calls in this image. I will publish it later.
>
> -- Pavel

Thanks Pavel.
I continue hunting on unimplemented calls in older code for see when and for
what was used the missed calls.

Edgar


__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
¡Abrí tu cuenta ya! - http://correo.yahoo.com.ar