Acces fum structure from an external plugin

>
> On 21-Aug-06, at 5:12 PM, Bruno Luca wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> is there a way to access the fum structure into interp.c from an  
>> external plugin?
> Not at the moment. Why do you feel the need to have it? Remember - it  
> doesn't contain *all* the variables you might think are globals. And it  
> isn't guaranteed to exist anyway even though the major platforms use it.
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Useful random insult:- Ought to have a warning label on his forehead.
>
>
>

> Bruno Luca schrieb:
>> There is the callbacks patch by Andreas Raab which i need for SqueakGtk.
>> Functions such as callbackEnter() and callbackLeave() are built in the  
>> interpreter. Since they are not part of the official VM i would use it  
>> from the plugin...
>
> But they surely are exposed through interpreterProxy? Wouldn't make much  
> sense otherwise, if they are indeed supposed to be used from plugin code.
>
> - Bert -
>
>

> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:22:26 +0200, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
>> Bruno Luca schrieb:
>>> There is the callbacks patch by Andreas Raab which i need for SqueakGtk.
>>> Functions such as callbackEnter() and callbackLeave() are built in
>>> the interpreter. Since they are not part of the official VM i would
>>> use it from the plugin...
>>
>> But they surely are exposed through interpreterProxy? Wouldn't make
>> much sense otherwise, if they are indeed supposed to be used from
>> plugin code.
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>>
>
> Yes they are in interpreterProxy... i know it wouldn't make sense to
> have them out of the interpreter but i need them ;) ok no problem...
> i'll upload a modified 3.9 VM for squeakgtk.

> Bruno Luca schrieb:
>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:22:26 +0200, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Bruno Luca schrieb:
>>>> There is the callbacks patch by Andreas Raab which i need for  
>>>> SqueakGtk.
>>>> Functions such as callbackEnter() and callbackLeave() are built in  
>>>> the interpreter. Since they are not part of the official VM i would  
>>>> use it from the plugin...
>>>
>>> But they surely are exposed through interpreterProxy? Wouldn't make  
>>> much sense otherwise, if they are indeed supposed to be used from  
>>> plugin code.
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>>>
>>>
>>  Yes they are in interpreterProxy... i know it wouldn't make sense to  
>> have them out of the interpreter but i need them ;) ok no problem...  
>> i'll upload a modified 3.9 VM for squeakgtk.
>
> I guess I misunderstood your question, then.
>
> Are the patches going into official 3.9 VMMaker?
>
> - Bert -
>