Folks:
I try to have the best Monticello in 3.10 . For this , I locate the last of Impara at http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4991 I wish keep the Ralph changes for the 3.10 release process. Made a Monticello-edc.316.mcz, test, all works. Copy to 3.10 repository, quit image without save. Loading via drag and drop or via FileList , all works. Loading via Monticello (what is what the update stream .cs should do). gives me the attached walkback and pict. Edgar |
On May 2, 2007, at 9:08 , Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> Folks: > > I try to have the best Monticello in 3.10 . > For this , I locate the last of Impara at > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4991 > I wish keep the Ralph changes for the 3.10 release process. > Made a Monticello-edc.316.mcz, test, all works. > Copy to 3.10 repository, quit image without save. > Loading via drag and drop or via FileList , all works. > Loading via Monticello (what is what the update stream .cs should > do). gives > me the attached walkback and pict. I'm not sure what this bug is, but I don't think you should use the impara version but rather the latest community version (probably whatever is on squeakmap). This is both on general principles and on technical ones, as the impara branch does some dependency handling a bit differently. - Bert - |
2007/5/2, Bert Freudenberg <[hidden email]>:
> On May 2, 2007, at 9:08 , Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > I try to have the best Monticello in 3.10 . > > For this , I locate the last of Impara at > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4991 > > I wish keep the Ralph changes for the 3.10 release process. > > Made a Monticello-edc.316.mcz, test, all works. > > Copy to 3.10 repository, quit image without save. > > Loading via drag and drop or via FileList , all works. > > Loading via Monticello (what is what the update stream .cs should > > do). gives > > me the attached walkback and pict. > > I'm not sure what this bug is, but I don't think you should use the > impara version but rather the latest community version (probably > whatever is on squeakmap). This is both on general principles and on > technical ones, as the impara branch does some dependency handling a > bit differently. That's not the Impara version. That's the changes of the Impara version merged into the version delivered with 3.9 (as the comment says). This version has been in production use at netstyle.ch for months. The SqueakMap version doesn't work on 3.9 as well as the Impara version. Cheers Philippe > - Bert - > > > > |
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
El 5/2/07 1:16 PM, "Bert Freudenberg" <[hidden email]> escribió: > I'm not sure what this bug is, but I don't think you should use the > impara version but rather the latest community version (probably > whatever is on squeakmap). This is both on general principles and on > technical ones, as the impara branch does some dependency handling a > bit differently. > > - Bert - I copy from Mantis: >> Summary 0004991: [FIX] Monticello Changes from Impara >> Description This file contains the changes of the Monticello fork at >> Impara. >> Among other things it includes fixes for: >> - FFI: loading of external strcutures >> - class variable order: no longer significant, might vary from image to image >> - User interface: class builder version of Monticello Browser has a tree, >> more >> and better feedback on progress >> It does not contain all the password "enhancements". It stores the passwords >> in the image. They get sent plaintext over the internet anyway. It containts >> however the menu option to reset all Monticello passwords in the image. This is IMHO what Steph are saying we should use, if not, no problem for me. Seems better what we have in 3.10 now, except what loading from repository gives the walkback Edgar |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |