Hi All, I have a plugin dependent on several support libraries that may be shared with other plugins. So I want the support libraries in a common place (TheVm.app/Contents/Frameworks) while the plugins themselves are bundles in TheVM.app/Contents/Resources. In allowing one to install plugin support libraries in TheVM.app/Contents/Frameworks I have to use the linker's -rpath feature to specify where dlopen may find the search libraries. The question i don't see an answer to in Apple's documentation is whether one uses -rpath when linking the plugin, or when linking the VM into which the plugin will be loaded, or both. Anybody ever done this and know definitively what to do? _,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:08 AM Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
Never mind. I think I've found what I need: _,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 01:35, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:08 AM Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I have a plugin dependent on several support libraries that may be shared with other plugins. So I want the support libraries in a common place (TheVm.app/Contents/Frameworks) while the plugins themselves are bundles in TheVM.app/Contents/Resources. In allowing one to install plugin support libraries in TheVM.app/Contents/Frameworks I have to use the linker's -rpath feature to specify where dlopen may find the search libraries. The question i don't see an answer to in Apple's documentation is whether one uses -rpath when linking the plugin, or when linking the VM into which the plugin will be loaded, or both. Anybody ever done this and know definitively what to do? > > > Never mind. I think I've found what I need: > https://medium.com/@donblas/fun-with-rpath-otool-and-install-name-tool-e3e41ae86172 > https://wincent.com/wiki/@executable_path,_@load_path_and_@rpath Interesting reading. thx for the links. cheers -ben |
In reply to this post by Eliot Miranda-2
yep.
The Pharo distribution uses install_name_tool to deal with it, if you want an example already in osvm code: Esteban
|
Hi Esteban, On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:51 AM Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
It's perhaps a case of "if it ain't broke, don't fixit", but I wonder if it would be better for Pharo to use Frameworks to hold dlls and Resources to hold plugin dlls/bindles. Contents/MacOS/Plugins is, I *think*, unique to Pharo.
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
Yes, this is an inherited situation and I ignore the rationale behind it. I agree this way of distributing is not appropriate but I just didn’t have the time to fix it (because after all, it is working so I always have something more urgent to do). Esteban
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |