Auto-correction of @-

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Auto-correction of @-

Andreas.Raab
Hi -

It looks like the auto-correction of @- and friends is severely broken
when there's more than one @- in a method. Try to correct this for example:

test

        self addLandmark: 'Home' at: -90@240@160 facing: -23@-42@0 sort:'a'.
        self addLandmark: 'Stage' at: 115@0.2@-290 facing: 0@-45@0 sort: 'b'.
        self addLandmark: 'View' at: 317@0@-640 facing: 0@-155@0 sort: 'c'.

Any ideas?

Cheers,
   - Andreas

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Auto-correction of @-

Igor Stasenko
On 10 March 2010 04:14, Andreas Raab <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi -
>
> It looks like the auto-correction of @- and friends is severely broken when
> there's more than one @- in a method. Try to correct this for example:
>
> test
>
>        self addLandmark: 'Home' at: -90@240@160 facing: -23@-42@0 sort:'a'.
>        self addLandmark: 'Stage' at: 115@0.2@-290 facing: 0@-45@0 sort: 'b'.
>        self addLandmark: 'View' at: 317@0@-640 facing: 0@-155@0 sort: 'c'.
>
> Any ideas?
>
reiterate the correction over modified method, until no new
modifications possible?

> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
>



--
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Auto-correction of @-

Nicolas Cellier
See comment in Compiler-nice.136

Cheers

Nicolas

2010/3/10 Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]>:

> On 10 March 2010 04:14, Andreas Raab <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> It looks like the auto-correction of @- and friends is severely broken when
>> there's more than one @- in a method. Try to correct this for example:
>>
>> test
>>
>>        self addLandmark: 'Home' at: -90@240@160 facing: -23@-42@0 sort:'a'.
>>        self addLandmark: 'Stage' at: 115@0.2@-290 facing: 0@-45@0 sort: 'b'.
>>        self addLandmark: 'View' at: 317@0@-640 facing: 0@-155@0 sort: 'c'.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
> reiterate the correction over modified method, until no new
> modifications possible?
>
>> Cheers,
>>  - Andreas
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
>