Well, the Consortium surely knows more than me. And indeed the SDK
developers do not seem to communicate on croquet-dev in an open
manner. So it looks like the meanings have/were shifted.
If I were me I'd suggest to stick to the original list designations,
and add a croquet-open list for non-technical discussion. Wait, I
_am_ me. So there.
- Bert -
On Jun 15, 2007, at 9:34 , Joshua Gargus wrote:
> What Bert says makes sense, but from the Consortium wiki:
>
> Croquet-Developer is for technical discussion and problem solving
> among programmers working with Croquet.
> Croquet-User is for non-technical discussion around Croquet and its
> application in education, industry, and entertainment.
> (
http://opencroquet.org/index.php/Mailing_Lists)
>
> It might make sense to change these to reflect Bert's
> understanding. Or not, I don't care too much.
>
> Josh
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>> On Jun 15, 2007, at 2:54 , Joshua Gargus wrote:
>>
>>> (by the way, you might want to post development questions to the
>>> croquet-dev list instead)
>>
>> Croquet-dev is about advancing the SDK, croquet-user about using
>> it. Using an SDK means developing of course, so this is indeed the
>> right list to ask development questions.
>>
>> There is no "end-user" Croquet list because Croquet is not an "end-
>> user" product.
>>
>> - Bert -