Better type than void* for primitiveFunctionPointer?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Better type than void* for primitiveFunctionPointer?

timrowledge
 
In Interpreter>declareCVarsIn: we currently have:-
                declareC: 'void *primitiveFunctionPointer' . "xxxx FIX THIS  
STUPIDITY xxxx - ikp. What he means is use a better type than void *,  
apparently - tpr"

Anyone care to offer the better type than void* ? Speak now or stop  
whining later.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; [hidden email]; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Fractured Idiom:- QUE SERA SERF - Life is feudal