Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

Browser visibility

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

7 messages Options

Ron Teitelbaum

Browser visibility

All,

Is there a browser in squeak that allows you to set visibility like in VW?

Ron

wilkesj

Re: Browser visibility

I'm not sure how that is handled in VW, but you may want to do a
search for Cees's RefractoringBrowser.

On 1/19/06, Ron Teitelbaum <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Is there a browser in squeak that allows you to set visibility like in VW?
>
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>

Cees De Groot

Re: Browser visibility

On 1/20/06, Wilkes Joiner <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I'm not sure how that is handled in VW, but you may want to do a
> search for Cees's RefractoringBrowser.
>
I was about to respond that earlier today, but didn't you mean method
visibility up the class hierarchy, Ron?

Ron Teitelbaum

RE: Browser visibility

What I like is setting visibility of methods to a specific class. The
browser shows me all methods in all classes up to that level. Then if I
need to override a method I make a change to it. When I accept the method
it asks what class (in the hierarchy) to write the method in. I was
creating a SharedQueueSorted and this would have made things much easier.

I found the RB Browser, but I didn't see visibility. Just Move up and Move
down. Are there more features that I'm missing?

Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:squeak-dev-
> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Cees De Groot
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 5:28 PM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: Browser visibility
>
> On 1/20/06, Wilkes Joiner <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure how that is handled in VW, but you may want to do a
> > search for Cees's RefractoringBrowser.
> >
> I was about to respond that earlier today, but didn't you mean method
> visibility up the class hierarchy, Ron?
>

stéphane ducasse-2

Re: Browser visibility

Ron

RB does not support what you are looking for. I think that
OmniBrowser would be a nice place to add this functionality.
We hope to get icons soon. Romain is working on using services to
bring refactorings into OB and a lot of behavior.
Sounds like we should integrate the changes of Cees too.

Stef

> What I like is setting visibility of methods to a specific class. The
> browser shows me all methods in all classes up to that level. Then
> if I
> need to override a method I make a change to it. When I accept the
> method
> it asks what class (in the hierarchy) to write the method in. I was
> creating a SharedQueueSorted and this would have made things much
> easier.
>
> I found the RB Browser, but I didn't see visibility. Just Move up
> and Move
> down. Are there more features that I'm missing?
>
> Ron
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [hidden email] [mailto:squeak-
>> dev-
>> [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Cees De Groot
>> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 5:28 PM
>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
>> Subject: Re: Browser visibility
>>
>> On 1/20/06, Wilkes Joiner <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure how that is handled in VW, but you may want to do a
>>> search for Cees's RefractoringBrowser.
>>>
>> I was about to respond that earlier today, but didn't you mean method
>> visibility up the class hierarchy, Ron?
>>
>
>
>

Cees De Groot

Re: Browser visibility

On 1/21/06, stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Sounds like we should integrate the changes of Cees too.
>
That'd be nice. I've been using it since I wrote the thing and I
really like it. Of course, it could be extended to have more powerful
selections of what to show and what not, but the basic idea turned out
to be very useful.

stéphane ducasse-2

Re: Browser visibility

I would like to wait that romain provides refactorings as services
for OB. But indeed this would be nice.
Marcus separated the UI from the engine so now it should pay off.
Been able to not have the old browser
RB browser and use OB.

Stef

On 21 janv. 06, at 10:03, Cees De Groot wrote:

> On 1/21/06, stéphane ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Sounds like we should integrate the changes of Cees too.
>>
> That'd be nice. I've been using it since I wrote the thing and I
> really like it. Of course, it could be extended to have more powerful
> selections of what to show and what not, but the basic idea turned out
> to be very useful.
>
>