Can "Method source with it" be sped up?

> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:01:52AM +0000, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I find "Method source with it" a last, but often used method when looking
> > where a string is used, when forgetting how something is implemented but
> > remembering some key string etc - sort of a brute force "google on
> > source", very useful.
>
> For finding a String within source (like, looking up a menu
> label), use "Method Strings with it", Alt-Shift-E. I have never
> needed method source with it once I learned what that did.

> On 2008 June 23, Matthew Fulmer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:01:52AM +0000, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I find "Method source with it" a last, but often used method when  
>>> looking
>>> where a string is used, when forgetting how something is  
>>> implemented but
>>> remembering some key string etc - sort of a brute force "google on
>>> source", very useful.
>>
>> For finding a String within source (like, looking up a menu
>> label), use "Method Strings with it", Alt-Shift-E. I have never
>> needed method source with it once I learned what that did.
>
> I do not trust "method strings with it". Maybe I am missing  
> something, but try
> this: Highlight an instance variable in class definition. Do "method  
> strings
> with it" - it finds nothing, even though that variable is in many  
> places in
> that class methods.  BTW, am I missing something here, is this a  
> bug, or is
> this expected?

> In any case I cannot use it the way it works for me at this
> point.
>
> Also, I often I find a situation that I remember a string or token  
> that I know
> relates to the "thing" I am looking for. What I remember is often  
> part of
> instvar name,  perhaps part of method name, comment, or whatever.  
> For those
> situations (and I seem not be alone in that mental flaw :) ) it is  
> great to
> just say "search everything" -like googgle. But it is prohibitively  
> slow in
> Squeak (and no caching happens such as it seems to in for example  
> Eclipse
> where first search is quite fast and following very fast).
>
> Anyway, apart from wishing it would be faster I was curious if  
> anyone has an
> idea why.

> >
> > I do not trust "method strings with it". Maybe I am missing
> > something, but try
> > this: Highlight an instance variable in class definition. Do "method
> > strings
> > with it" - it finds nothing, even though that variable is in many
> > places in
> > that class methods.  BTW, am I missing something here, is this a
> > bug, or is
> > this expected?
>
> Expected. It only looks in literal strings (written as 'string') -
> that is, labels etc.

>
> > In any case I cannot use it the way it works for me at this
> > point.
> >
> > Also, I often I find a situation that I remember a string or token
> > that I know
> > relates to the "thing" I am looking for. What I remember is often
> > part of
> > instvar name,  perhaps part of method name, comment, or whatever.
> > For those
> > situations (and I seem not be alone in that mental flaw :) ) it is
> > great to
> > just say "search everything" -like googgle. But it is prohibitively
> > slow in
> > Squeak (and no caching happens such as it seems to in for example
> > Eclipse
> > where first search is quite fast and following very fast).
> >
> > Anyway, apart from wishing it would be faster I was curious if
> > anyone has an
> > idea why.
>
> Yes. It uses the regular "get method source" approach for each method
> in each class. That is, for each method in the system, it opens the
> sources file, seeks to the method offset, reads sequentially until it
> finds a chunk marker ('!' but not '!!'), closes file, replaces all
> '!!' with '!', answers text. Possibly it also styles the method if it
> was saved with embedded links etc. Possibly it even scans backwards to
> find the method time stamp (though I'd hope when just getting the
> source text we would not hit this).
>
> Anyway, this is way more inefficient that just seeking for a string in
> a file sequentially.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners