Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Monticello, Metacello ... › Metacello

ConfigurationOfPharo project lastVersion asnwers a baseline!

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

3 messages Options

Mariano Martinez Peck

ConfigurationOfPharo project lastVersion asnwers a baseline!

Hi Dale. If I take a PharoCore1.2 with metacello .28 lastVersion answer a baseline1.2. Is this the correct behavior? because it has strange inpact. For exaple, with ConfigurationOfPharo lastVersion used to answer beta2, but not the baselibe,
I know it is due to the migration to symbolic versions and bleeding edge. But I just want to be sure...

cheers

mariano

Dale Henrichs

Re: ConfigurationOfPharo project lastVersion asnwers a baseline!

On 01/21/2011 02:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> Hi Dale. If I take a PharoCore1.2 with metacello .28 lastVersion answer
> a baseline1.2. Is this the correct behavior? because it has strange
> inpact. For exaple, with ConfigurationOfPharo lastVersion used to answer
> beta2, but not the baselibe,
> I know it is due to the migration to symbolic versions and bleeding
> edge. But I just want to be sure...
>
> cheers
>
> mariano

Mariano,

Nope this is a bug ... a couple of months ago I thought that I _should_
change the definition of some of the helper methods, but since then I
changed my mind ... the helper methods have to be consistent with the
pre 1.0-beta.28 defintions, but my body didn't do what brain wanted:)

I'll have a fix out shortly.

Dale

Mariano Martinez Peck

Re: ConfigurationOfPharo project lastVersion asnwers a baseline!

Thanks dale for the fix. It was killing us in Pharo.

cheers

mariano

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 01/21/2011 02:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

Hi Dale. If I take a PharoCore1.2 with metacello .28 lastVersion answer
a baseline1.2. Is this the correct behavior? because it has strange
inpact. For exaple, with ConfigurationOfPharo lastVersion used to answer
beta2, but not the baselibe,
I know it is due to the migration to symbolic versions and bleeding
edge. But I just want to be sure...

cheers

mariano

Mariano,

Nope this is a bug ... a couple of months ago I thought that I _should_ change the definition of some of the helper methods, but since then I changed my mind ... the helper methods have to be consistent with the pre 1.0-beta.28 defintions, but my body didn't do what brain wanted:)

I'll have a fix out shortly.

Dale