Contributors Agreement signature status?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
62 messages Options
1234
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: how to become modular (was "Contributors Agreement signature status?")

J J-6
I was afraid of this.  I looked all over and I can't find a way to turn off HTML mail sending.  I guess Microsoft once again knows best.  I guess it's time to start seeing what it will take to move to gmail (or if someone else recommends a free mailer, let me know! :) )




> From: [hidden email]

> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:27:21 -0400
> Subject: Re: how to become modular (was "Contributors Agreement signature status?")
>
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:41:30 -0700, Craig Latta <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > (Is it just me, or do all your messages come through without
> > newlines, even in the quoted material?)
>
> I get the same thing, until I switch to using HTML rendering, and then his
> messages come out fine...
>
> Later,
> Jon
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Hylands [hidden email] http://www.huv.com/jon
>
> Project: Micro Raptor (Small Biped Velociraptor Robot)
> http://www.huv.com/blog
>


Local listings, incredible imagery, and driving directions - all in one place! Find it!

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: how to become modular (was "Contributors Agreement signature status?")

Lex Spoon-3
In reply to this post by Avi Bryant-2
"Avi Bryant" <[hidden email]> writes:

> On 7/5/07, Craig Latta <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Having a short-term-gain mindset at all times will
> > cause the total effort to be much harder and take much longer. I'm sorry
> > if this sounds harsh (it sounds harsh to me, you don't need to convince
> > me of that :). Despite that, I think it's still best to speak plainly here.
>
> I'll speak plainly back, then.  You asked in a recent message how to
> get someone else to use Spoon.  The only true answer I can give is,
> offer them a short term gain.  Yes, short term incremental improvement
> causes the total effort to be greater, but it also mitigates adoption
> risk: at each incremental stage you can assess whether or not people
> are actually going to use the work you're doing or not, and modify
> what you're doing accordingly.


I submit that also, some of the ideas are controversial.  One person's
leap to the future, is another person's final plunge into stark raving
madness.

It is really cool that Squeak has people like Craig trying out wild
ideas.  At the same time, it's really cool that Squeak has a proven
core on which you can reliably develop practical software.  Heck,
without that practical core, how much of the cool stuff would even get
off the ground?

We should cherish and respect both kinds of software and ideas within
the community.


Lex



1234