Daily Commit Log

Changes to Trunk (http://source.squeak.org/trunk.html) in the last 24 hours:

http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2010-September/003734.html

Name: Kernel-nice.491
Ancestors: Kernel-ar.490

Prevent bench to display 14 digits or so.
3 significative digits should be enough for a human brain (at least mine).

=============================================

http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2010-September/003735.html

Name: Kernel-nice.492
Ancestors: Kernel-nice.491

Second revision of bench to display:

The rules are:

- display 10,400,000 rather than 1.04e7
- display 24 rather than 24.0
- display a fractional part only if significative

In any case, only first 3 digits are displayed, the rest are rounded to zero because considered un-meaningfull.

Above 100, every digit after the decimal point is at least in fourth position, so the decimal part won't be displayed.

=============================================

http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2010-September/003736.html

Name: KernelTests-klc.163
Ancestors: KernelTests-klc.162

Once more I may be missing something obvious here.  The uncommented assertion was comparing instances of two different classes, I'm pretty sure it was meant to be comparing the increment of an end to the start of the next timespan, which is how I changed it.  Then there was a commented out assertion which I think was missing the #= and once I add it it works fine despite the comment that it wouldn't until some change occurred.  Perhaps this change did?

=============================================

http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2010-September/003737.html

Name: KernelTests-klc.162
Ancestors: KernelTests-klc.161

Once more I may be missing something obvious here.  The uncommented assertion was comparing instances of two different classes, I'm pretty sure it was meant to be comparing the increment of an end to the start of the next timespan, which is how I changed it.  Then there was a commented out assertion which I think was missing the #= and once I add it it works fine despite the comment that it wouldn't until some change occurred.  Perhaps this change did?

=============================================