Hi all,
while browsing a bit through our exception framework, I stumbled upon a significant number of exception classes for all of which I neither found any sender in my Trunk image, nor any subclass:
Abort EndOfStream ExceptionAboutToReturn FontSubstitutionDuringLoading NanError UndeclaredVariableReference
So here is my question: Would you agree to deprecate them all? Or could any of them still be relevant for non-in-trunk senders? I can prepare a changeset if you think we should get rid of them.
Best, Christoph
Carpe Squeak!
|
Hi Christoph, On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:30 AM Thiede, Christoph <[hidden email]> wrote:
I would like to see us keep at least EndOfStream. ExceptionAboutToReturn and Abort can be deleted, not just deprecated. They're ancient and obsolete.
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
Hi all! > I would like to see us keep at least EndOfStream. ExceptionAboutToReturn and Abort can be deleted, not just deprecated. They're ancient and obsolete. +1 Best, Marcel
|
Hi all!
1. What is the purpose of EndOfStream if we don't use it even longer in Trunk? Sounds like an alternative iteration concept (cf. Python's StopIteration) which however would be contrary to the existing mechanism using #next and #atEnd.
2. What's about the other exception classes I have listed below? May I deprecate them all? :-)
Best, Christoph Von: Squeak-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Taeumel, Marcel
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. September 2020 14:15:05 An: squeak-dev Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] Dead exceptions
Hi all!
> I would like to see us keep at least EndOfStream. ExceptionAboutToReturn and Abort can be deleted, not just deprecated. They're ancient and obsolete.
+1
Best,
Marcel
Carpe Squeak!
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |