Hi,
Looking at Dictionary>>#collect: I am wondering why it don't return a Dictionary. So I give you the test and fix. I didn't test the side effect. HTH Math Dictionary-collect.st (699 bytes) Download Attachment DictionaryTest-testCollect.st (721 bytes) Download Attachment |
Hi Math,
on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:48:21 +0100, you wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at Dictionary>>#collect: I am wondering why it don't return a > Dictionary. This is so since SqueakV1.sources. In SmalltalkV2.sources (ST80) it returned a Bag. Both the latter and your variant are damned *slow*. > So I give you the test and fix. Have you considered all the packages which perhaps depend on the current, speedy implementation? /Klaus > I didn't test the side effect. > > HTH > Math |
In reply to this post by Mathieu SUEN
<Mathieu Suen>
Looking at Dictionary>>#collect: I am wondering why it don't return a Dictionary. </Mathieu Suen> The ANSI Smalltalk Standard requires that Dictionary>>collect: answer a new Dictionary with the same keys, but whose values have been transformed by the transformer (the argument of the message.) --Alan |
In reply to this post by Klaus D. Witzel
Yes of course so how to get the same behavior? provide a new method
in Dictionary? Math On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:17 PM, Klaus D. Witzel wrote: > Hi Math, > > on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:48:21 +0100, you wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Looking at Dictionary>>#collect: I am wondering why it don't return a >> Dictionary. > > This is so since SqueakV1.sources. In SmalltalkV2.sources (ST80) it > returned a Bag. Both the latter and your variant are damned *slow*. > >> So I give you the test and fix. > > Have you considered all the packages which perhaps depend on the > current, speedy implementation? > > /Klaus > >> I didn't test the side effect. >> >> HTH >> Math > > > |
Hi Math,
on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:41:53 +0100, you wrote: > Yes of course so how to get the same behavior? provide a new method in > Dictionary? If it where easy (with regards to existing, most likely unloaded packages) I would have made a suggestion. Perhaps you add it under #dictionaryCollect: so that people can use it if wanted. I agree with Alan about ANSII but, this is not compatible with the received Squeak releases. Furthermore, there is a discrepancy between Dictionary>>#select: and Dictionary>>#collect: :( /Klaus > Math > > On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:17 PM, Klaus D. Witzel wrote: > >> Hi Math, >> >> on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:48:21 +0100, you wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Looking at Dictionary>>#collect: I am wondering why it don't return a >>> Dictionary. >> >> This is so since SqueakV1.sources. In SmalltalkV2.sources (ST80) it >> returned a Bag. Both the latter and your variant are damned *slow*. >> >>> So I give you the test and fix. >> >> Have you considered all the packages which perhaps depend on the >> current, speedy implementation? >> >> /Klaus >> >>> I didn't test the side effect. >>> >>> HTH >>> Math >> >> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by Mathieu SUEN
2007/2/14, Alan Lovejoy <[hidden email]>:
> <Mathieu Suen> > Looking at Dictionary>>#collect: I am wondering why it don't return a > Dictionary. > </Mathieu Suen> > > The ANSI Smalltalk Standard requires that Dictionary>>collect: answer a new > Dictionary with the same keys, but whose values have been transformed by the > transformer (the argument of the message.) GST does so. STX returns a Bag of the values transformed, VW returns an OrderedCollection of the values transformed. Philippe > --Alan > > > > |
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:57:01 +0100, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> 2007/2/14, Alan Lovejoy <[hidden email]>: >> <Mathieu Suen> >> Looking at Dictionary>>#collect: I am wondering why it don't return a >> Dictionary. >> </Mathieu Suen> >> >> The ANSI Smalltalk Standard requires that Dictionary>>collect: answer a >> new >> Dictionary with the same keys, but whose values have been transformed >> by the >> transformer (the argument of the message.) > > GST does so. STX returns a Bag of the values transformed, VW returns > an OrderedCollection of the values transformed. ROTFL :) Long live language compatibility :) So perhaps, VW ported code might break if Squeak adopted ANSI. > Philippe > >> --Alan >> >> >> >> > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |