There is a set of nine updates in the inbox for Etoys, provided by Jens Lincke
last year, that appear to all be related updates and fixes for Kedama. Is there any reason not to move these to trunk and merge into Etoys? Dave |
No.
On 12/2/17, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > There is a set of nine updates in the inbox for Etoys, provided by Jens > Lincke > last year, that appear to all be related updates and fixes for Kedama. > > Is there any reason not to move these to trunk and merge into Etoys? > > Dave > > |
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:03:11AM +0100, H. Hirzel wrote:
> > On 12/2/17, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > There is a set of nine updates in the inbox for Etoys, provided by Jens > > Lincke > > last year, that appear to all be related updates and fixes for Kedama. > > > > Is there any reason not to move these to trunk and merge into Etoys? > > > > No. > Thanks Hannes, On closer look, it appears that all of the EToys-jl.NNN.mcz files are alreadly merged into Etoys trunk. So probably they just need to be moved over to the treated inbox at this point? Dave |
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:18:01AM -0500, David T. Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:03:11AM +0100, H. Hirzel wrote: > > > > On 12/2/17, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > There is a set of nine updates in the inbox for Etoys, provided by Jens > > > Lincke > > > last year, that appear to all be related updates and fixes for Kedama. > > > > > > Is there any reason not to move these to trunk and merge into Etoys? > > > > > > > No. > > > > Thanks Hannes, > > On closer look, it appears that all of the EToys-jl.NNN.mcz files are > alreadly merged into Etoys trunk. So probably they just need to be moved > over to the treated inbox at this point? > After confirming that they have been merged to Etoys trunk, I have moved EToys-jl.210, EToys-jl.222, EToys-jl.223, EToys-jl.224, EToys-jl.225, EToys-jl.226, EToys-jl.230, EToys-jl.231, and EToys-jl.235 to the treated inbox. Dave |
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:03:53PM -0500, David T. Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:18:01AM -0500, David T. Lewis wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:03:11AM +0100, H. Hirzel wrote: > > > > > > On 12/2/17, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > There is a set of nine updates in the inbox for Etoys, provided by Jens > > > > Lincke > > > > last year, that appear to all be related updates and fixes for Kedama. > > > > > > > > Is there any reason not to move these to trunk and merge into Etoys? > > > > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > Thanks Hannes, > > > > On closer look, it appears that all of the EToys-jl.NNN.mcz files are > > alreadly merged into Etoys trunk. So probably they just need to be moved > > over to the treated inbox at this point? > > > > After confirming that they have been merged to Etoys trunk, I have moved > EToys-jl.210, EToys-jl.222, EToys-jl.223, EToys-jl.224, EToys-jl.225, EToys-jl.226, > EToys-jl.230, EToys-jl.231, and EToys-jl.235 to the treated inbox. > The last remaining inbox entry for Etoys was EToys-kfr.127. This has already been added to trunk and merged, so I moved the inbox entry to treated inbox. The inbox for Etoys is now empty. Dave |
> On 06.12.2017, at 04:21, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:03:53PM -0500, David T. Lewis wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:18:01AM -0500, David T. Lewis wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:03:11AM +0100, H. Hirzel wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/2/17, David T. Lewis <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> There is a set of nine updates in the inbox for Etoys, provided by Jens >>>>> Lincke >>>>> last year, that appear to all be related updates and fixes for Kedama. >>>>> >>>>> Is there any reason not to move these to trunk and merge into Etoys? >>>>> >>>> >>>> No. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks Hannes, >>> >>> On closer look, it appears that all of the EToys-jl.NNN.mcz files are >>> alreadly merged into Etoys trunk. So probably they just need to be moved >>> over to the treated inbox at this point? >>> >> >> After confirming that they have been merged to Etoys trunk, I have moved >> EToys-jl.210, EToys-jl.222, EToys-jl.223, EToys-jl.224, EToys-jl.225, EToys-jl.226, >> EToys-jl.230, EToys-jl.231, and EToys-jl.235 to the treated inbox. >> > > The last remaining inbox entry for Etoys was EToys-kfr.127. This has already been > added to trunk and merged, so I moved the inbox entry to treated inbox. > > The inbox for Etoys is now empty. \o/ yay! |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |