Hi all
We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests when running on SPUR: ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction Receiver: ExceptionTests>>#testHandlerFromAction Arguments and temporary variables: result: 'inner' Receiver's instance variables: testSelector: #testHandlerFromAction timeout: nil The wrong error handler is triggered. VM problem or image problem? Best regards -Tobias |
Is primitive 199 still a marker only? There seems to be no in-image handling of this behavior. Thus, I suspect the comment in BlockClosure >> #on:do: is wrong. Or is the more VM magic involved and the primitive 201 (BlockClosure >> #value) walks the stack and looks for "handlerActive == true"?!
|
In reply to this post by Tobias Pape
Hi Tobias,
That test is a feature request. It has been around since 4.3 or so, and is waiting for a volunteer to implement the requested behavior. IIRC there have been attempts to do it, but no one took the time to review the proposed solutions. Levente On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Tobias Pape wrote: > Hi all > > We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests > when running on SPUR: > > ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction > Receiver: ExceptionTests>>#testHandlerFromAction > Arguments and temporary variables: > result: 'inner' > Receiver's instance variables: > testSelector: #testHandlerFromAction > timeout: nil > > The wrong error handler is triggered. > VM problem or image problem? > > Best regards > -Tobias > > |
On 08.09.2015, at 10:58, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi Tobias, > > That test is a feature request. It has been around since 4.3 or so, and is waiting for a volunteer to implement the requested behavior. IIRC there have been attempts to do it, but no one took the time to review the proposed solutions. > So this should be an expected failure then? Best regards -Tobias > Levente > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Tobias Pape wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests >> when running on SPUR: >> >> ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction >> Receiver: ExceptionTests>>#testHandlerFromAction >> Arguments and temporary variables: >> result: 'inner' >> Receiver's instance variables: >> testSelector: #testHandlerFromAction >> timeout: nil >> >> The wrong error handler is triggered. >> VM problem or image problem? >> >> Best regards >> -Tobias |
In reply to this post by Tobias Pape
Hi Tobias,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi all Off topic, but I prefer Spur (as I prefer Cog). They're just names. No acronymics.
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
On 08.09.2015, at 14:35, Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all > > We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests > when running on SPUR: > > Off topic, but I prefer Spur (as I prefer Cog). They're just names. No acronymics. Oh sorry. I always get confused with the SPUR jit [1], not content-wise but spelling-wise. best regards -Tobias [1]: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1869517 |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Tobias Pape <[hidden email]> wrote:
No problem, but then that's an even better reason to use "Spur", to disambiguate :-). best regards _,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |