On 4/3/2010 2:22 PM, Colin Putney wrote:
> > On 2010-04-03, at 11:50 AM, Andreas Raab wrote: > >> On 4/3/2010 11:27 AM, Levente Uzonyi wrote: >>> On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Andreas Raab wrote: >>>> Interesting. My encounters with OB mostly originate from Pharo where >>>> it's always been dog-slow so I was never interested in looked deeper. >>>> Any ideas how to install OB without that stuff? >>> >>> Try this: >> >> Thanks. It's definitely better than I remembered. I'm still noticing a real delay in some areas though, for example when I click on a system category. One thing you can try to test this is to open a regular browser and OB and then just keep scrolling through the system categories with cursor up or cursor down. In the regular browser this entirely smooth; in OB it's "stuttering" and at least I notice the same delay when clicking on the list. > > Yeah, this one area where OB is certainly not as fast. That's because OB sorts classes according to inheritance, rather than name. It's just more work. I find the tradeoff worthwhile - it's not that slow, and the extra information imparted by the sort order is useful - but reasonable people may disagree. It wouldn't be hard to make this a preference. caused by some gross inefficiencies when updating. If you file in the attached tweaks, OB scrolls just as smoothly as the standard browser. I'm not sure if the tweaks have side effects though; you might want to verify that (in particular because of the comment in OBColumn>>switchFilter: which indicates some interference although I can't see how that could make a difference if the filter is identical). Cheers, - Andreas OmniTweaks-ar.cs (1K) Download Attachment |
On 2010-04-06, at 8:25 PM, Andreas Raab wrote: > Nope it's not that. A bit of profiling shows the particular problem is caused by some gross inefficiencies when updating. If you file in the attached tweaks, OB scrolls just as smoothly as the standard browser. I'm not sure if the tweaks have side effects though; you might want to verify that (in particular because of the comment in OBColumn>>switchFilter: which indicates some interference although I can't see how that could make a difference if the filter is identical). That is awesome, thanks! It seems to work fine; I've removed the comment. It's probably out of date, and if there are visual oddities, the fix is undoubtedly somewhere else. Colin |
In reply to this post by Levente Uzonyi-2
Hi all,
I noticed that 'instance' '?' and 'class' do not show any visual clue about their state, i.e. 'instace' button should be _selected_ when
browsing instance methods. Do you experience the same issue? Any solution (I searched around [mailing list and Mantis] but found nothing...)?
Thanks in advance Bye Enrico
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 20:27, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Enrico Spinielli "Do Androids dream of electric sheep?"— Philip K. Dick "Hear and forget; see and remember;do and understand."—Mitchel Resnick |
Enrico Spinielli wrote: > Hi all, > I noticed that 'instance' '?' and 'class' do not show any visual clue > about their state, i.e. 'instace' button should be _selected_ when > browsing instance methods. > Do you experience the same issue? > Any solution (I searched around [mailing list and Mantis] but found > nothing...)? Do you mean the Browser in Trunk, or OB? Because in Trunk there is a visual indication - see attached. OK, not MUCH of an indication. (Class is selected.) frank browser-instance-class.jpg (4K) Download Attachment |
OB
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 16:22, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
-- Enrico Spinielli "Do Androids dream of electric sheep?"— Philip K. Dick "Hear and forget; see and remember;do and understand."—Mitchel Resnick |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |