Does anyone have an insight into how we ought to resolve these two FloatTest
failures.
FloatTest>>ttestNaN5 and >>testZero2 fail in 3.9a 7025. Can they can be
fixed or do we think they're pointing to real problems in Float re ieee754?
> From: Paul McDonough wrote
> ... back to school ... in any case, I'm not 'ppm.'
> Although I'm sure I was at the same table where those
> tests were being worked on at CS4 ... hm, don't
> remember any ppm's. Roger Whitney worked on Floats, I
> think? And/or Jeff Hallman?
> --- Thomas Koenig <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Paul,
> > Hi. We're trying to get all s-unit tests to run clean
> > in 3.9. I think you
> > added the following test cases (initials are ppm)
> > which is why I want to get
> > your opinion on how to proceed. FloatTest>>ttestNaN5
> > and >>testZero2 fail in
> > 3.9a 7025. Can they can be fixed or do you think
> > they're pointing to real
> > problems in Float re ieee754? In the latter case
> > maybe they should be marked
> > "expected errors"?
> > Thanks for any help. Tom
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>
http://mail.yahoo.com
Locked
