Hi Dean--
> Since modularity and reuse are somewhat at odds with each other (much
> like time and frequency, MIPS and memory usage, etc.) this raises the
> question of what is a "good" balance between modularity and reuse?
>
> Also, what constitutes a "minimal" image? I think there are almost
> as many answers to this as there are users of Squeak.
>
> Do most people really care about modularity, or do they just want
> a way to get a small artifact (i.e. image) for distribution?
>
> I will stop before I get too far down another rat-hole.
Thanks for spurring discussion!
-C
--
Craig Latta
http://netjam.org/resume