GSOC 2009 not accepted

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

GSOC 2009 not accepted

askoh
Administrator
I am sorry to report that GSOC reject our application this year. I am trying to get some feedback as to why we failed this year while being successful in the past two. I will also try to learn how we may improve our chances for future years.

Thanks for your support,
Aik-Siong Koh
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted

Bert Freudenberg
On 18.03.2009, at 23:30, askoh wrote:

> I am sorry to report that GSOC reject our application this year. I  
> am trying
> to get some feedback as to why we failed this year while being  
> successful in
> the past two. I will also try to learn how we may improve our  
> chances for
> future years.


Ah, too bad. Thanks for your efforts!

I heard that Google accepted fewer organizations than last year. For  
example, OLPC did not get in either.

But SugarLabs made it, and Etoys/Squeak is part of Sugar. So if some  
student would want to apply for that, to work on, say, building a  
framework to develop Sugar activities in Squeak, I'd be all ears.

- Bert -



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GSOC 2009 not accepted

askoh
Administrator
In reply to this post by askoh
Possible reasons for our failure can be seen here:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2009/03/our-fifth-google-summer-of-code-meet.html
They wanted larger groups.
They dropped old groups for new ones.
Community engagement is critical.

Aik-Siong Koh
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted

askoh
Administrator
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
Thanks Bert. Great idea.

As Bert suggested, nothing prevents us from joining other groups that do work that interests us. It might even be good to expose others to Squeak when we join them.

Any one knows of other groups that can use Squeak mentors and students?

All the best,
Aik-Siong Koh
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted

Donna@hawcenter.org
Hi Aik-Siong,

I am the founder of the Hawthorne Center for Innovation in the Southern
California area. I also applied for GSoC 2009. The Center has a whole
"wish-list" of Squeak-based projects we would have liked to have gotten
funded. I would be interested in connecting up for next year's program.

I found Squeak on the web in the fall of 2005 while searching through wiki
frameworks for the 20 years of history I had harvested and wanted to get
onto the web. While surfing I ran into Swiki and from there I soon ran into
the then newly-published book by Stephane Ducasse, Squeak: Learn Programming
with Robots. I was so excited! - I had started the Center to work with
homeschooled kids in my area and had wanted to develop a robotics program
that didn't involve the expense of buying Mindstorms or Logo.

When I got the book, being a non-geek, I could barely understand what was
being discussed, but there were pictures and I could at least figure out
that I was finally in the right ballpark! I handed the book over to my
Principal Research Scientist-in-Residence, Ben Cooper, who also got excited;
we got hold of every piece of literature on Smalltalk that we could. After 6
months of intensive study, Ben started to head a weekly workshop here at the
Center for kids on Squeak.

Now, 3 + years later, the Center has morphed into a small research institute
helping to support the work of a group of internationally-placed Squeakers
and Ben has started a collaborative arrangement with a student form the
University of Missouri-Rolla to create lessons for introducing Squeak to
kids form 8 to 80 which will provide the experience of "painlessly" learning
of the principles of computer science while having fun with graphics.

At present, I don't have much on my website; in a couple of days, I will
have the alpha version of the first lesson up at www.hawcenter.org. I will
also put up the "wish list " that I would have posted for GSoC 2009. I will
include more about on-going Squeak-projects being worked on through the
Center including the data structure Ben is writing for my history wiki (as
yet unnamed).

Looking forward to any relationship,

Donna Schrokosch

----- Original Message -----
From: "askoh" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted


>
> Thanks Bert. Great idea.
>
> As Bert suggested, nothing prevents us from joining other groups that do
> work that interests us. It might even be good to expose others to Squeak
> when we join them.
>
> Any one knows of other groups that can use Squeak mentors and students?
>
> All the best,
> Aik-Siong Koh
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/GSOC-2009-not-accepted-tp22589998p22600985.html
> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted

askoh
Administrator
Donna:

Yes, we can help each other. Google seems to be looking for bigger groups that have critical mass. So do post in the Squeak mailing lists and let us see your foundations work. We need to show our activities throughout the year and not just before GSOC.

All the best,
Aik-Siong Koh
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted

Donna@hawcenter.org
Aik-Siong

Ok. I will keep the list informed of the Center's activities. And will have
the first lessons up, as I say, hopefully by Monday.

Thanks,
Donna

----- Original Message -----
From: "askoh" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted


>
> Donna:
>
> Yes, we can help each other. Google seems to be looking for bigger groups
> that have critical mass. So do post in the Squeak mailing lists and let us
> see your foundations work. We need to show our activities throughout the
> year and not just before GSOC.
>
> All the best,
> Aik-Siong Koh
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/GSOC-2009-not-accepted-tp22589998p22607838.html
> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GSOC 2009 not accepted

askoh
Administrator
In reply to this post by askoh
Feedback from Leslie and my response. Aik-Siong Koh

Leslie:

Thanks for your reply. We do appreciate the past support for Squeak. We will continue to improve and try again. Let us know if you have any suggestions for us.

All the best,
Aik-Siong Koh

> Hello Aik-Siong,
>
> Thank you for your email. I am afraid the feedback I will have for you
> will
> not be very satisfying. We simply chose not to accept some organizations
> this year that we had in the past, and Squeak was one that was debated for
> quite awhile. We are varying the mix of projects each year and as we
> decided
> to accept fewer organizations this year - down to 150 - we were forced to
> make some very tough decisions. Your application was good and we sincerely
> thank you for all that you have done in the past with Google Summer of
> Code.
>
>
> With best regards,
> LH
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Aik-Siong Koh <askoh@askoh.com> wrote:
>
>> Leslie:
>>
>> I just found out that Squeak Smalltalk has been rejected after two very
>> successful years with GSOC. Google Malaysia even interviewed one of our
>> project students. And all our last year's projects completed with
>> significant results.
>>
>> How can I and the Squeak community get feedback on the cause?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aik-Siong Koh
>> Squeak Smalltalk admin
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Leslie Hawthorn
> Program Manager - Open Source
> Google Inc.
>
> http://code.google.com/opensource/
>
> I blog here:
>
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com - http://www.hawthornlandings.org
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted

Rita Freudenberg
In reply to this post by Donna@hawcenter.org
Hi Donna,

its great to hear what you are doing! From your mail I assume you are
using Squeak with BotsInc and the Smalltalk delvelopment environment?
Are you doing that with 8-year-old kids? Are you using Etoys, the
tile-scripting environment as well? I would like to know whats on your
wish-list!
We founded Squeakland Foundation this year to (among other things)
promote Squeak-Etoys, create educational material, and build an online
community of Etoys users world wide. With that, we are looking in many
directions, for instance, the use of Etoys in the classroom, wherefore
we create material for teachers aligned with the curriculum, or the use
by the kids themselves at home, so I think that Etoys would be a very
useful tool for homeschooled kids. What do you think?

Greetings,
Rita

[hidden email] wrote:

> Hi Aik-Siong,
>
> I am the founder of the Hawthorne Center for Innovation in the
> Southern California area. I also applied for GSoC 2009. The Center has
> a whole "wish-list" of Squeak-based projects we would have liked to
> have gotten funded. I would be interested in connecting up for next
> year's program.
>
> I found Squeak on the web in the fall of 2005 while searching through
> wiki frameworks for the 20 years of history I had harvested and wanted
> to get onto the web. While surfing I ran into Swiki and from there I
> soon ran into the then newly-published book by Stephane Ducasse,
> Squeak: Learn Programming with Robots. I was so excited! - I had
> started the Center to work with homeschooled kids in my area and had
> wanted to develop a robotics program that didn't involve the expense
> of buying Mindstorms or Logo.
>
> When I got the book, being a non-geek, I could barely understand what
> was being discussed, but there were pictures and I could at least
> figure out that I was finally in the right ballpark! I handed the book
> over to my Principal Research Scientist-in-Residence, Ben Cooper, who
> also got excited; we got hold of every piece of literature on
> Smalltalk that we could. After 6 months of intensive study, Ben
> started to head a weekly workshop here at the Center for kids on Squeak.
>
> Now, 3 + years later, the Center has morphed into a small research
> institute helping to support the work of a group of
> internationally-placed Squeakers and Ben has started a collaborative
> arrangement with a student form the University of Missouri-Rolla to
> create lessons for introducing Squeak to kids form 8 to 80 which will
> provide the experience of "painlessly" learning of the principles of
> computer science while having fun with graphics.
>
> At present, I don't have much on my website; in a couple of days, I
> will have the alpha version of the first lesson up at
> www.hawcenter.org. I will also put up the "wish list " that I would
> have posted for GSoC 2009. I will include more about on-going
> Squeak-projects being worked on through the Center including the data
> structure Ben is writing for my history wiki (as yet unnamed).
>
> Looking forward to any relationship,
>
> Donna Schrokosch
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "askoh" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted
>
>
>>
>> Thanks Bert. Great idea.
>>
>> As Bert suggested, nothing prevents us from joining other groups that do
>> work that interests us. It might even be good to expose others to Squeak
>> when we join them.
>>
>> Any one knows of other groups that can use Squeak mentors and students?
>>
>> All the best,
>> Aik-Siong Koh
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/GSOC-2009-not-accepted-tp22589998p22600985.html
>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


--
Rita Freudenberg
FIN-ISG
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
http://isgwww.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/isg/rita.html


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [squeak-dev] GSOC 2009 not accepted

Karl Ramberg
In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg
On 2009-03-18 23:56, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> On 18.03.2009, at 23:30, askoh wrote:
>
>> I am sorry to report that GSOC reject our application this year. I am
>> trying
>> to get some feedback as to why we failed this year while being
>> successful in
>> the past two. I will also try to learn how we may improve our chances
>> for
>> future years.
>
>
> Ah, too bad. Thanks for your efforts!
>
> I heard that Google accepted fewer organizations than last year. For
> example, OLPC did not get in either.
>
> But SugarLabs made it, and Etoys/Squeak is part of Sugar. So if some
> student would want to apply for that, to work on, say, building a
> framework to develop Sugar activities in Squeak, I'd be all ears.
Fast loading of projects like DrGeoII would be great !!!!

Karl