2016-06-18 20:19 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Passerini <[hidden email]>:
You can use shift+backspace for backword-delete-word. This works on windows and linux. Cleaning up the shortcut handling, would make it easy to change this to ctrl+backspace (there is already an issue about this, for windows, but this applies to linux as well: 13882 Under Windows the key to remove a word is not SHIFT+Backspace but CTRL + Backspace) |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: Hi Nicolai, what are the "raw" ones? The events the OS generates or the events the VM send out to the image? 2. another layer that offers a more logical keys (like meta). Can you explain this a bit more.
I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" - Mac: Command - Win/Linux: Ctrl Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now better?
|
Hi,
Command is an actual key on Mac next to Option(which is Alt) and Control. So, Command is a concrete key and mapping it logically to another key on another platform is mixing semantics. I propose to have two distinct layers in the image: 1. the raw layer is about having a distinct selector for each concrete key that is found on the keyboard. Right now, it seems to me that the VM does a bit of interpretation and mapping, and if it does, I think it should just provide a distinct code for each distinct key. 2. the portable layer is about having a couple of selectors (e.g., #meta, #secondaryMeta) that provide consistent mappings to the raw keys. So, in this way, #command/#control/#alt would belong to layer 1. and #meta/#secondaryMeta (we could find a better name) would belong to layer 2. Does this make sense? Cheers, Doru > On Jun 18, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > 2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > Hi Nicolai, > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 14:35 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > I am a bit removed from the code details at the moment, and I think I need to step back a bit :). > > > > If I understand correctly, you are saying that: > > 1. defining bindings with #alt does not work on Windows. This means that we should fix this one. Using Cmd should not be a solution here. > > > > As far as I know, this is on purpose. A key pressed with windows (left) alt modified is mapped to "command" > > > > from vm source: > > > > * 3) The modifier keys are mapped as follows: > > * > > * Mac | Win32 > > * -------------------- > > * Shift -> Shift > > * Ctrl -> Ctrl > > * Command -> Left ALT > > * Option -> Right ALT > > > > (but actually, the right ALT key does not generate any keystrokes (only key down/up) and it is treated as ctrl+alt (windows right Alt key is "Alt Gr”) > > Hmm. I think we have to rethink this one because we need two layers of keys: > 1. first we should have the raw ones, and > > what are the "raw" ones? The events the OS generates or the events the VM send out to the image? > > 2. another layer that offers a more logical keys (like meta). > > Can you explain this a bit more. > > > What do you think? > > > > 2. defining the > > bindings for Spotter can indeed be made to override the ones in the text editor if needed. But, I think we can start thinking about using #alt. > > > > using alt+right on windows/linux and > > command + right on mac > > for dive-in or for text navigation? > > > > Is there a default keycombination for word-moving in text components for mac ? > > On Mac, typically Alt+Right/Left moves between words. > > So, we would need a logical modifier that would mean: > - Mac: Alt > - Win: Ctrl > - Linux: Ctrl > > I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" > > - Mac: Command > - Win/Linux: Ctrl > > Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now better? > > > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-16 22:45 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think we are mixing the topics a bit. The #meta discussion is not specific to Spotter actions. > > > > > > On windows, it is. Because on windows #meta is mapped to #ctrl, and you can use ctrl+left/right for moving by "words". This works in a browser, an editor, pharos text components but *not* in spotter > > > because spotter redefines this keystrokes for dive in /out. > > > Currently, both ctrl+left/right and alt+left/right (and shift for selection) are working in rubric for moving by "word". But only because the (old) shortcut (cmd/shiftcmd) action dispatcher > > > explicitly allows both. If we want to remove this and use the KMDispatcher framework only, we *need* to define only one mapping, otherwise you won't be able to use dive in/out in spotter. > > > (Or you could modify spotter to register(overwrite) the mapping on the textfield instead of the spotter morph). > > > > > > > > > The idea was to offer a uniform support of keybindings in Pharo, in general. > > > > > > exactly, and using ctrl+left/right uniformly in editor and external tools would be great. > > > > > > Then Guille etal added #meta to have a predictable mapping. > > > > > > Yes, and to make this work, we have to remove the old keymapping implementation (cmd/shiftcmd action map) and use the KMDispatcher registration. But I can only continue with this > > > if we have a decision what to use, (windows/linux: either ctrl+arrow or alt+arrow, mac: whatever is used on a mac for text navigation) > > > > > > All #cmd places were changed to #meta, and since then we should not use explicitly #cmd anymore, except when we know we are on Mac. For a portable modifier, we should only use #meta. > > > > > > At this point, both Rubric and Spotter use #meta. #meta maps on: > > > - Mac: Command > > > - Win: Control > > > - Linus: Control > > > > > > This means that #alt is now a portable modifier that will not conflict with #meta, so we can now think of using that one in combination with #meta. > > > > > > You can not use #alt modifier on windows. A shortcut definition like > > > $g alt > > > is never recognized. You have to define it > > > $g command > > > to make it work with as "alt+g"-keycombination (on windows). > > > > > > > > > > > > For text navigation, the situation is a bit complicated. On Win/Linux, Ctrl+Right/Left moves the cursor between words. On Mac, Cmd+Right/Left moves the cursor at the end/beginning of line. So, using #meta for text navigation between words is not entirely accurate. We should use #ctrl instead. > > > > > > This would anyway mean that it would be an option to use #alt for Spotter now. But, if we are at it, would anyone be interested in working on revisiting the overall keybindings in Pharo? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 16:12 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > We can, but I remember there were some discussions and it was decided to use meta everywhere. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > If we don't change this, I'll use cmd+left cmd+right in rubric, but this is bad, because all other navigate/select+navigate shortcuts would use meta as shortcut modifier. > > > > > > > > What are the arguments for using meta for dive-in/out shortcuts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 15:08 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > During Pharo 5 most shortcuts from tools were changed to use "meta" instead of cmd. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > Can we change this for spotter ? cmd instead of meta > > > > > > > > ctrl left/right is often used for text components to move to next/previous word. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 13:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > Am 07.06.2016 1:56 nachm. schrieb "Henrik Nergaard" <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > IIRC the shortcut is not changed, it still is meta+right(+shift). Only the tooltip was changed to display the system specific key instead of “cmd” so for Windows/Linux this would be “ctrl”. > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it changed > > > > > > > > In #40624, for example, it was cmd (alt-key on windows ) right/shift right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pharo-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Nicolai Hess > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 12:56 PM > > > > > To: Pharo Development List <[hidden email]> > > > > > Subject: [Pharo-dev] GT-Spotter dive in shortcut > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > > > > > > > > > > cmd+right > > > > > > > > > > cmd+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > ctrl+right > > > > > ctrl+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > I know there were some discussions about this and that the behavior changed some > > > > > > > > > > time ago, but I don't know the rational behind this. > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > nicolai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, > > > you will end up with a messy haircut." > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > www.feenk.com > > > > "Quality cannot be an afterthought." > > > > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Being happy is a matter of choice." -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Every thing has its own flow." |
In reply to this post by Nicolai Hess-3-2
Not better, just different. In the general case, shortcuts with ctrl use cmd on Mac (like ctrl-c, ctrl-v, etc), but some navigation shortcuts (like previous / next word) use alt on osx where windows use ctrl. So having both meta and alt-meta bindings as I described, lets you represent both, but, due to the nature of alt, some care/restrictions would need to be applied to alt-meta that are not necessary for meta. |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
2016-06-18 20:55 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: Hi, So, what does that mean for the text navigation mapping in Rubric. Which shortcut should I use? Cheers, |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Command is an actual key on Mac next to Option(which is Alt) and Control. So, Command is a concrete key and mapping it logically to another key on another platform is mixing semantics. +1000. We should avoid our abstract shortcut key modifiers overlaping concrete keys. > > I propose to have two distinct layers in the image: > 1. the raw layer is about having a distinct selector for each concrete key that is found on the keyboard. Right now, it seems to me that the VM does a bit of interpretation and mapping, and if it does, I think it should just provide a distinct code for each distinct key. > 2. the portable layer is about having a couple of selectors (e.g., #meta, #secondaryMeta) that provide consistent mappings to the raw keys. Sounds good. > > So, in this way, #command/#control/#alt would belong to layer 1. and #meta/#secondaryMeta > > (we could find a better name) would belong to layer 2. Historical alternatives: hyper, super But super looks to already be associated with a concrete key, so that would leave hyper. http://askubuntu.com/questions/19558/what-are-the-meta-super-and-hyper-keys btw, Emacs uses these names https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Modifier-Keys.html Or, just brainstorming a unique alternative... If meta is thought of as met-a, we could use: metb, meti, meto, metu, mety, metz, mota, miti, moti. I think I like meti or miti for the diminutive / secondary feel of them. p.s. I like this article I bumped into with tips on physical exercises... http://ergoemacs.org/emacs/emacs_pinky.html > > Does this make sense? Very much. In addition, to help the layering (and also to encourage not-using ctrl, alt directly), maybe require a modifier like 'exception' or 'exceptionDirect' or just 'direct' for access to those concrete keys. e.g. f exception ctrl, f exceptionDirect dtrl, f direct ctrl cheers -ben > > Cheers, > Doru > > >> On Jun 18, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> 2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: >> >> > On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> > 2016-06-17 14:35 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: >> > Hi Nicolai, >> > >> > I am a bit removed from the code details at the moment, and I think I need to step back a bit :). >> > >> > If I understand correctly, you are saying that: >> > 1. defining bindings with #alt does not work on Windows. This means that we should fix this one. Using Cmd should not be a solution here. >> > >> > As far as I know, this is on purpose. A key pressed with windows (left) alt modified is mapped to "command" >> > >> > from vm source: >> > >> > * 3) The modifier keys are mapped as follows: >> > * >> > * Mac | Win32 >> > * -------------------- >> > * Shift -> Shift >> > * Ctrl -> Ctrl >> > * Command -> Left ALT >> > * Option -> Right ALT >> > >> > (but actually, the right ALT key does not generate any keystrokes (only key down/up) and it is treated as ctrl+alt (windows right Alt key is "Alt Gr”) >> >> Hmm. I think we have to rethink this one because we need two layers of keys: >> 1. first we should have the raw ones, and >> >> what are the "raw" ones? The events the OS generates or the events the VM send out to the image? >> >> 2. another layer that offers a more logical keys (like meta). >> >> Can you explain this a bit more. >> >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> > 2. defining the >> > bindings for Spotter can indeed be made to override the ones in the text editor if needed. But, I think we can start thinking about using #alt. >> > >> > using alt+right on windows/linux and >> > command + right on mac >> > for dive-in or for text navigation? >> > >> > Is there a default keycombination for word-moving in text components for mac ? >> >> On Mac, typically Alt+Right/Left moves between words. >> >> So, we would need a logical modifier that would mean: >> - Mac: Alt >> - Win: Ctrl >> - Linux: Ctrl >> >> I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" >> >> - Mac: Command >> - Win/Linux: Ctrl >> >> Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now better? >> >> >> >> What do you think? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> > >> > Does this make sense? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Doru >> > >> > >> > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > >> > > 2016-06-16 22:45 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I think we are mixing the topics a bit. The #meta discussion is not specific to Spotter actions. >> > > >> > > On windows, it is. Because on windows #meta is mapped to #ctrl, and you can use ctrl+left/right for moving by "words". This works in a browser, an editor, pharos text components but *not* in spotter >> > > because spotter redefines this keystrokes for dive in /out. >> > > Currently, both ctrl+left/right and alt+left/right (and shift for selection) are working in rubric for moving by "word". But only because the (old) shortcut (cmd/shiftcmd) action dispatcher >> > > explicitly allows both. If we want to remove this and use the KMDispatcher framework only, we *need* to define only one mapping, otherwise you won't be able to use dive in/out in spotter. >> > > (Or you could modify spotter to register(overwrite) the mapping on the textfield instead of the spotter morph). >> > > >> > > >> > > The idea was to offer a uniform support of keybindings in Pharo, in general. >> > > >> > > exactly, and using ctrl+left/right uniformly in editor and external tools would be great. >> > > >> > > Then Guille etal added #meta to have a predictable mapping. >> > > >> > > Yes, and to make this work, we have to remove the old keymapping implementation (cmd/shiftcmd action map) and use the KMDispatcher registration. But I can only continue with this >> > > if we have a decision what to use, (windows/linux: either ctrl+arrow or alt+arrow, mac: whatever is used on a mac for text navigation) >> > > >> > > All #cmd places were changed to #meta, and since then we should not use explicitly #cmd anymore, except when we know we are on Mac. For a portable modifier, we should only use #meta. >> > > >> > > At this point, both Rubric and Spotter use #meta. #meta maps on: >> > > - Mac: Command >> > > - Win: Control >> > > - Linus: Control >> > > >> > > This means that #alt is now a portable modifier that will not conflict with #meta, so we can now think of using that one in combination with #meta. >> > > >> > > You can not use #alt modifier on windows. A shortcut definition like >> > > $g alt >> > > is never recognized. You have to define it >> > > $g command >> > > to make it work with as "alt+g"-keycombination (on windows). >> > > >> > > For text navigation, the situation is a bit complicated. On Win/Linux, Ctrl+Right/Left moves the cursor between words. On Mac, Cmd+Right/Left moves the cursor at the end/beginning of line. So, using #meta for text navigation between words is not entirely accurate. We should use #ctrl instead. >> > > >> > > This would anyway mean that it would be an option to use #alt for Spotter now. But, if we are at it, would anyone be interested in working on revisiting the overall keybindings in Pharo? >> > > >> > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > 2016-06-07 16:12 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: >> > > > >> > > > We can, but I remember there were some discussions and it was decided to use meta everywhere. >> > > > >> > > > If we don't change this, I'll use cmd+left cmd+right in rubric, but this is bad, because all other navigate/select+navigate shortcuts would use meta as shortcut modifier. >> > > > >> > > > What are the arguments for using meta for dive-in/out shortcuts ? >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > 2016-06-07 15:08 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: >> > > > >> > > > During Pharo 5 most shortcuts from tools were changed to use "meta" instead of cmd. >> > > > Can we change this for spotter ? cmd instead of meta >> > > > ctrl left/right is often used for text components to move to next/previous word. >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > 2016-06-07 13:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: >> > > > >> > > > Am 07.06.2016 1:56 nachm. schrieb "Henrik Nergaard" <[hidden email]>: >> > > > > IIRC the shortcut is not changed, it still is meta+right(+shift). Only the tooltip was changed to display the system specific key instead of “cmd” so for Windows/Linux this would be “ctrl”. >> > > > >> > > > No, it changed >> > > > In #40624, for example, it was cmd (alt-key on windows ) right/shift right >> > > > >> > > > > To: Pharo Development List <[hidden email]> >> > > > > Subject: [Pharo-dev] GT-Spotter dive in shortcut >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from >> > > > > >> > > > > cmd+right >> > > > > cmd+shift+right >> > > > > >> > > > > to >> > > > > >> > > > > ctrl+right >> > > > > ctrl+shift+right >> > > > > >> > > > > I know there were some discussions about this and that the behavior changed some >> > > > > time ago, but I don't know the rational behind this. |
In reply to this post by Nicolai Hess-3-2
2016-06-18 23:34 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>:
Any way to take a decision? I don't really want to wait until we implement a new layer.
|
Hi,
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > 2016-06-18 23:34 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > 2016-06-18 20:55 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > Command is an actual key on Mac next to Option(which is Alt) and Control. So, Command is a concrete key and mapping it logically to another key on another platform is mixing semantics. > > I propose to have two distinct layers in the image: > 1. the raw layer is about having a distinct selector for each concrete key that is found on the keyboard. Right now, it seems to me that the VM does a bit of interpretation and mapping, and if it does, I think it should just provide a distinct code for each distinct key. > 2. the portable layer is about having a couple of selectors (e.g., #meta, #secondaryMeta) that provide consistent mappings to the raw keys. > > So, in this way, #command/#control/#alt would belong to layer 1. and #meta/#secondaryMeta (we could find a better name) would belong to layer 2. > > Does this make sense? > > > So, what does that mean for the text navigation mapping in Rubric. Which shortcut should I use? > > Any way to take a decision? > > I don't really want to wait until we implement a new layer. Thanks for the ping. I think that you cannot use now properly a uniform shortcut if we do not introduce these “layers”. I also think that we are talking about a couple of methods, so the effort is only in making the decision. I think that given that nobody disagreed, we can go ahead with it. For the specific question related to text navigation in Rubric, you could use #meta. What do you think? Doru > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On Jun 18, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 14:35 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > > I am a bit removed from the code details at the moment, and I think I need to step back a bit :). > > > > > > If I understand correctly, you are saying that: > > > 1. defining bindings with #alt does not work on Windows. This means that we should fix this one. Using Cmd should not be a solution here. > > > > > > As far as I know, this is on purpose. A key pressed with windows (left) alt modified is mapped to "command" > > > > > > from vm source: > > > > > > * 3) The modifier keys are mapped as follows: > > > * > > > * Mac | Win32 > > > * -------------------- > > > * Shift -> Shift > > > * Ctrl -> Ctrl > > > * Command -> Left ALT > > > * Option -> Right ALT > > > > > > (but actually, the right ALT key does not generate any keystrokes (only key down/up) and it is treated as ctrl+alt (windows right Alt key is "Alt Gr”) > > > > Hmm. I think we have to rethink this one because we need two layers of keys: > > 1. first we should have the raw ones, and > > > > what are the "raw" ones? The events the OS generates or the events the VM send out to the image? > > > > 2. another layer that offers a more logical keys (like meta). > > > > Can you explain this a bit more. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > 2. defining the > > > bindings for Spotter can indeed be made to override the ones in the text editor if needed. But, I think we can start thinking about using #alt. > > > > > > using alt+right on windows/linux and > > > command + right on mac > > > for dive-in or for text navigation? > > > > > > Is there a default keycombination for word-moving in text components for mac ? > > > > On Mac, typically Alt+Right/Left moves between words. > > > > So, we would need a logical modifier that would mean: > > - Mac: Alt > > - Win: Ctrl > > - Linux: Ctrl > > > > I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" > > > > - Mac: Command > > - Win/Linux: Ctrl > > > > Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now better? > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-16 22:45 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I think we are mixing the topics a bit. The #meta discussion is not specific to Spotter actions. > > > > > > > > On windows, it is. Because on windows #meta is mapped to #ctrl, and you can use ctrl+left/right for moving by "words". This works in a browser, an editor, pharos text components but *not* in spotter > > > > because spotter redefines this keystrokes for dive in /out. > > > > Currently, both ctrl+left/right and alt+left/right (and shift for selection) are working in rubric for moving by "word". But only because the (old) shortcut (cmd/shiftcmd) action dispatcher > > > > explicitly allows both. If we want to remove this and use the KMDispatcher framework only, we *need* to define only one mapping, otherwise you won't be able to use dive in/out in spotter. > > > > (Or you could modify spotter to register(overwrite) the mapping on the textfield instead of the spotter morph). > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea was to offer a uniform support of keybindings in Pharo, in general. > > > > > > > > exactly, and using ctrl+left/right uniformly in editor and external tools would be great. > > > > > > > > Then Guille etal added #meta to have a predictable mapping. > > > > > > > > Yes, and to make this work, we have to remove the old keymapping implementation (cmd/shiftcmd action map) and use the KMDispatcher registration. But I can only continue with this > > > > if we have a decision what to use, (windows/linux: either ctrl+arrow or alt+arrow, mac: whatever is used on a mac for text navigation) > > > > > > > > All #cmd places were changed to #meta, and since then we should not use explicitly #cmd anymore, except when we know we are on Mac. For a portable modifier, we should only use #meta. > > > > > > > > At this point, both Rubric and Spotter use #meta. #meta maps on: > > > > - Mac: Command > > > > - Win: Control > > > > - Linus: Control > > > > > > > > This means that #alt is now a portable modifier that will not conflict with #meta, so we can now think of using that one in combination with #meta. > > > > > > > > You can not use #alt modifier on windows. A shortcut definition like > > > > $g alt > > > > is never recognized. You have to define it > > > > $g command > > > > to make it work with as "alt+g"-keycombination (on windows). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For text navigation, the situation is a bit complicated. On Win/Linux, Ctrl+Right/Left moves the cursor between words. On Mac, Cmd+Right/Left moves the cursor at the end/beginning of line. So, using #meta for text navigation between words is not entirely accurate. We should use #ctrl instead. > > > > > > > > This would anyway mean that it would be an option to use #alt for Spotter now. But, if we are at it, would anyone be interested in working on revisiting the overall keybindings in Pharo? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 16:12 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > We can, but I remember there were some discussions and it was decided to use meta everywhere. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we don't change this, I'll use cmd+left cmd+right in rubric, but this is bad, because all other navigate/select+navigate shortcuts would use meta as shortcut modifier. > > > > > > > > > > What are the arguments for using meta for dive-in/out shortcuts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 15:08 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > During Pharo 5 most shortcuts from tools were changed to use "meta" instead of cmd. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > Can we change this for spotter ? cmd instead of meta > > > > > > > > > > ctrl left/right is often used for text components to move to next/previous word. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 13:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > Am 07.06.2016 1:56 nachm. schrieb "Henrik Nergaard" <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > IIRC the shortcut is not changed, it still is meta+right(+shift). Only the tooltip was changed to display the system specific key instead of “cmd” so for Windows/Linux this would be “ctrl”. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it changed > > > > > > > > > > In #40624, for example, it was cmd (alt-key on windows ) right/shift right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pharo-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Nicolai Hess > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 12:56 PM > > > > > > To: Pharo Development List <[hidden email]> > > > > > > Subject: [Pharo-dev] GT-Spotter dive in shortcut > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+right > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > ctrl+right > > > > > > ctrl+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > I know there were some discussions about this and that the behavior changed some > > > > > > > > > > > > time ago, but I don't know the rational behind this. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > nicolai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, > > > > you will end up with a messy haircut." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > "Quality cannot be an afterthought." > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > www.feenk.com > > > > "Being happy is a matter of choice." > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Every thing has its own flow." > > > > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Don't give to get. Just give." |
2016-08-03 10:02 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: Hi, But how? If I add this to RubTextEditor class>>#buildShortcutsOn: aBuilder (aBuilder shortcut: #nextWord) category: RubTextEditor name default: Character arrowRight meta do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorRight: event] description: 'move to next word'. (aBuilder shortcut: #previousWord) category: RubTextEditor name default: Character arrowLeft meta do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorLeft: event] description: 'move to the previous word'. we can not dive in/out in spotter. This is why I asked: Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from cmd+rightctrl+right ctrl+shift+right
|
Hi,
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > 2016-08-03 10:02 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > > On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-06-18 23:34 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > 2016-06-18 20:55 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > Hi, > > > > Command is an actual key on Mac next to Option(which is Alt) and Control. So, Command is a concrete key and mapping it logically to another key on another platform is mixing semantics. > > > > I propose to have two distinct layers in the image: > > 1. the raw layer is about having a distinct selector for each concrete key that is found on the keyboard. Right now, it seems to me that the VM does a bit of interpretation and mapping, and if it does, I think it should just provide a distinct code for each distinct key. > > 2. the portable layer is about having a couple of selectors (e.g., #meta, #secondaryMeta) that provide consistent mappings to the raw keys. > > > > So, in this way, #command/#control/#alt would belong to layer 1. and #meta/#secondaryMeta (we could find a better name) would belong to layer 2. > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > > > So, what does that mean for the text navigation mapping in Rubric. Which shortcut should I use? > > > > Any way to take a decision? > > > > I don't really want to wait until we implement a new layer. > > Thanks for the ping. > > I think that you cannot use now properly a uniform shortcut if we do not introduce these “layers”. I also think that we are talking about a couple of methods, so the effort is only in making the decision. I think that given that nobody disagreed, we can go ahead with it. > > For the specific question related to text navigation in Rubric, you could use #meta. > > But how? > If I add this to RubTextEditor class>>#buildShortcutsOn: aBuilder > > > (aBuilder shortcut: #nextWord) > category: RubTextEditor name > default: Character arrowRight meta > do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorRight: event] > description: 'move to next word'. > > > > (aBuilder shortcut: #previousWord) > category: RubTextEditor name > default: Character arrowLeft meta > do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorLeft: event] > description: 'move to the previous word'. > > > we can not dive in/out in spotter. > > This is why I asked: > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > cmd+right > cmd+shift+right > to > ctrl+right > ctrl+shift+right Oh, I see now! The change was made from cmd+right to meta+right in the move of Guille to make all keybindings uniform. If a keybinding would be problematic in Spotter, we could also override the keybinding directly in the Spotter editor, I think. What do you think? Cheers, Doru > > > What do you think? > > Doru > > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 14:35 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > > > > I am a bit removed from the code details at the moment, and I think I need to step back a bit :). > > > > > > > > If I understand correctly, you are saying that: > > > > 1. defining bindings with #alt does not work on Windows. This means that we should fix this one. Using Cmd should not be a solution here. > > > > > > > > As far as I know, this is on purpose. A key pressed with windows (left) alt modified is mapped to "command" > > > > > > > > from vm source: > > > > > > > > * 3) The modifier keys are mapped as follows: > > > > * > > > > * Mac | Win32 > > > > * -------------------- > > > > * Shift -> Shift > > > > * Ctrl -> Ctrl > > > > * Command -> Left ALT > > > > * Option -> Right ALT > > > > > > > > (but actually, the right ALT key does not generate any keystrokes (only key down/up) and it is treated as ctrl+alt (windows right Alt key is "Alt Gr”) > > > > > > Hmm. I think we have to rethink this one because we need two layers of keys: > > > 1. first we should have the raw ones, and > > > > > > what are the "raw" ones? The events the OS generates or the events the VM send out to the image? > > > > > > 2. another layer that offers a more logical keys (like meta). > > > > > > Can you explain this a bit more. > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > 2. defining the > > > > bindings for Spotter can indeed be made to override the ones in the text editor if needed. But, I think we can start thinking about using #alt. > > > > > > > > using alt+right on windows/linux and > > > > command + right on mac > > > > for dive-in or for text navigation? > > > > > > > > Is there a default keycombination for word-moving in text components for mac ? > > > > > > On Mac, typically Alt+Right/Left moves between words. > > > > > > So, we would need a logical modifier that would mean: > > > - Mac: Alt > > > - Win: Ctrl > > > - Linux: Ctrl > > > > > > I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" > > > > > > - Mac: Command > > > - Win/Linux: Ctrl > > > > > > Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now better? > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-16 22:45 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I think we are mixing the topics a bit. The #meta discussion is not specific to Spotter actions. > > > > > > > > > > On windows, it is. Because on windows #meta is mapped to #ctrl, and you can use ctrl+left/right for moving by "words". This works in a browser, an editor, pharos text components but *not* in spotter > > > > > because spotter redefines this keystrokes for dive in /out. > > > > > Currently, both ctrl+left/right and alt+left/right (and shift for selection) are working in rubric for moving by "word". But only because the (old) shortcut (cmd/shiftcmd) action dispatcher > > > > > explicitly allows both. If we want to remove this and use the KMDispatcher framework only, we *need* to define only one mapping, otherwise you won't be able to use dive in/out in spotter. > > > > > (Or you could modify spotter to register(overwrite) the mapping on the textfield instead of the spotter morph). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea was to offer a uniform support of keybindings in Pharo, in general. > > > > > > > > > > exactly, and using ctrl+left/right uniformly in editor and external tools would be great. > > > > > > > > > > Then Guille etal added #meta to have a predictable mapping. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and to make this work, we have to remove the old keymapping implementation (cmd/shiftcmd action map) and use the KMDispatcher registration. But I can only continue with this > > > > > if we have a decision what to use, (windows/linux: either ctrl+arrow or alt+arrow, mac: whatever is used on a mac for text navigation) > > > > > > > > > > All #cmd places were changed to #meta, and since then we should not use explicitly #cmd anymore, except when we know we are on Mac. For a portable modifier, we should only use #meta. > > > > > > > > > > At this point, both Rubric and Spotter use #meta. #meta maps on: > > > > > - Mac: Command > > > > > - Win: Control > > > > > - Linus: Control > > > > > > > > > > This means that #alt is now a portable modifier that will not conflict with #meta, so we can now think of using that one in combination with #meta. > > > > > > > > > > You can not use #alt modifier on windows. A shortcut definition like > > > > > $g alt > > > > > is never recognized. You have to define it > > > > > $g command > > > > > to make it work with as "alt+g"-keycombination (on windows). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For text navigation, the situation is a bit complicated. On Win/Linux, Ctrl+Right/Left moves the cursor between words. On Mac, Cmd+Right/Left moves the cursor at the end/beginning of line. So, using #meta for text navigation between words is not entirely accurate. We should use #ctrl instead. > > > > > > > > > > This would anyway mean that it would be an option to use #alt for Spotter now. But, if we are at it, would anyone be interested in working on revisiting the overall keybindings in Pharo? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 16:12 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > We can, but I remember there were some discussions and it was decided to use meta everywhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we don't change this, I'll use cmd+left cmd+right in rubric, but this is bad, because all other navigate/select+navigate shortcuts would use meta as shortcut modifier. > > > > > > > > > > > > What are the arguments for using meta for dive-in/out shortcuts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 15:08 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > During Pharo 5 most shortcuts from tools were changed to use "meta" instead of cmd. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we change this for spotter ? cmd instead of meta > > > > > > > > > > > > ctrl left/right is often used for text components to move to next/previous word. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 13:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 07.06.2016 1:56 nachm. schrieb "Henrik Nergaard" <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IIRC the shortcut is not changed, it still is meta+right(+shift). Only the tooltip was changed to display the system specific key instead of “cmd” so for Windows/Linux this would be “ctrl”. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it changed > > > > > > > > > > > > In #40624, for example, it was cmd (alt-key on windows ) right/shift right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pharo-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Nicolai Hess > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 12:56 PM > > > > > > > To: Pharo Development List <[hidden email]> > > > > > > > Subject: [Pharo-dev] GT-Spotter dive in shortcut > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ctrl+right > > > > > > > ctrl+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know there were some discussions about this and that the behavior changed some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time ago, but I don't know the rational behind this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nicolai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > > > "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, > > > > > you will end up with a messy haircut." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > "Quality cannot be an afterthought." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > "Being happy is a matter of choice." > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > www.feenk.com > > > > "Every thing has its own flow." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Don't give to get. Just give." -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" |
2016-08-07 15:23 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: Hi, what is Spotter editor? if it is the text input field, yes, but you have to overwrite it on this morph, right now spotter defines the shortcut on the spotter morph. This won' t work if rubtext components define the word-movement with the kmdispatcher. ( I already explained why).
|
Hi,
> On Aug 7, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > 2016-08-07 15:23 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > > > On Aug 3, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-08-03 10:02 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > Hi, > > > > > On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-18 23:34 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-18 20:55 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Command is an actual key on Mac next to Option(which is Alt) and Control. So, Command is a concrete key and mapping it logically to another key on another platform is mixing semantics. > > > > > > I propose to have two distinct layers in the image: > > > 1. the raw layer is about having a distinct selector for each concrete key that is found on the keyboard. Right now, it seems to me that the VM does a bit of interpretation and mapping, and if it does, I think it should just provide a distinct code for each distinct key. > > > 2. the portable layer is about having a couple of selectors (e.g., #meta, #secondaryMeta) that provide consistent mappings to the raw keys. > > > > > > So, in this way, #command/#control/#alt would belong to layer 1. and #meta/#secondaryMeta (we could find a better name) would belong to layer 2. > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > So, what does that mean for the text navigation mapping in Rubric. Which shortcut should I use? > > > > > > Any way to take a decision? > > > > > > I don't really want to wait until we implement a new layer. > > > > Thanks for the ping. > > > > I think that you cannot use now properly a uniform shortcut if we do not introduce these “layers”. I also think that we are talking about a couple of methods, so the effort is only in making the decision. I think that given that nobody disagreed, we can go ahead with it. > > > > For the specific question related to text navigation in Rubric, you could use #meta. > > > > But how? > > If I add this to RubTextEditor class>>#buildShortcutsOn: aBuilder > > > > > > (aBuilder shortcut: #nextWord) > > category: RubTextEditor name > > default: Character arrowRight meta > > do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorRight: event] > > description: 'move to next word'. > > > > > > > > (aBuilder shortcut: #previousWord) > > category: RubTextEditor name > > default: Character arrowLeft meta > > do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorLeft: event] > > description: 'move to the previous word'. > > > > > > we can not dive in/out in spotter. > > > > This is why I asked: > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > > cmd+right > > cmd+shift+right > > to > > ctrl+right > > ctrl+shift+right > > Oh, I see now! > > The change was made from cmd+right to meta+right in the move of Guille to make all keybindings uniform. > > If a keybinding would be problematic in Spotter, we could also override the keybinding directly in the Spotter editor, I think. What do you think? > > what is Spotter editor? if it is the text input field, yes, but you have to overwrite it on this morph That is what I meant, to define the keys for diving twice, once in the spotter morph and once in the text input field. This should solve the problem, right? Cheers, Doru > right now spotter defines the shortcut on the spotter morph. This won' t work > if rubtext components define the word-movement with the kmdispatcher. ( I already explained why). > > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 14:35 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > > > > > > I am a bit removed from the code details at the moment, and I think I need to step back a bit :). > > > > > > > > > > If I understand correctly, you are saying that: > > > > > 1. defining bindings with #alt does not work on Windows. This means that we should fix this one. Using Cmd should not be a solution here. > > > > > > > > > > As far as I know, this is on purpose. A key pressed with windows (left) alt modified is mapped to "command" > > > > > > > > > > from vm source: > > > > > > > > > > * 3) The modifier keys are mapped as follows: > > > > > * > > > > > * Mac | Win32 > > > > > * -------------------- > > > > > * Shift -> Shift > > > > > * Ctrl -> Ctrl > > > > > * Command -> Left ALT > > > > > * Option -> Right ALT > > > > > > > > > > (but actually, the right ALT key does not generate any keystrokes (only key down/up) and it is treated as ctrl+alt (windows right Alt key is "Alt Gr”) > > > > > > > > Hmm. I think we have to rethink this one because we need two layers of keys: > > > > 1. first we should have the raw ones, and > > > > > > > > what are the "raw" ones? The events the OS generates or the events the VM send out to the image? > > > > > > > > 2. another layer that offers a more logical keys (like meta). > > > > > > > > Can you explain this a bit more. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. defining the > > > > > bindings for Spotter can indeed be made to override the ones in the text editor if needed. But, I think we can start thinking about using #alt. > > > > > > > > > > using alt+right on windows/linux and > > > > > command + right on mac > > > > > for dive-in or for text navigation? > > > > > > > > > > Is there a default keycombination for word-moving in text components for mac ? > > > > > > > > On Mac, typically Alt+Right/Left moves between words. > > > > > > > > So, we would need a logical modifier that would mean: > > > > - Mac: Alt > > > > - Win: Ctrl > > > > - Linux: Ctrl > > > > > > > > I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" > > > > > > > > - Mac: Command > > > > - Win/Linux: Ctrl > > > > > > > > Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now better? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-16 22:45 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we are mixing the topics a bit. The #meta discussion is not specific to Spotter actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > On windows, it is. Because on windows #meta is mapped to #ctrl, and you can use ctrl+left/right for moving by "words". This works in a browser, an editor, pharos text components but *not* in spotter > > > > > > because spotter redefines this keystrokes for dive in /out. > > > > > > Currently, both ctrl+left/right and alt+left/right (and shift for selection) are working in rubric for moving by "word". But only because the (old) shortcut (cmd/shiftcmd) action dispatcher > > > > > > explicitly allows both. If we want to remove this and use the KMDispatcher framework only, we *need* to define only one mapping, otherwise you won't be able to use dive in/out in spotter. > > > > > > (Or you could modify spotter to register(overwrite) the mapping on the textfield instead of the spotter morph). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea was to offer a uniform support of keybindings in Pharo, in general. > > > > > > > > > > > > exactly, and using ctrl+left/right uniformly in editor and external tools would be great. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then Guille etal added #meta to have a predictable mapping. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and to make this work, we have to remove the old keymapping implementation (cmd/shiftcmd action map) and use the KMDispatcher registration. But I can only continue with this > > > > > > if we have a decision what to use, (windows/linux: either ctrl+arrow or alt+arrow, mac: whatever is used on a mac for text navigation) > > > > > > > > > > > > All #cmd places were changed to #meta, and since then we should not use explicitly #cmd anymore, except when we know we are on Mac. For a portable modifier, we should only use #meta. > > > > > > > > > > > > At this point, both Rubric and Spotter use #meta. #meta maps on: > > > > > > - Mac: Command > > > > > > - Win: Control > > > > > > - Linus: Control > > > > > > > > > > > > This means that #alt is now a portable modifier that will not conflict with #meta, so we can now think of using that one in combination with #meta. > > > > > > > > > > > > You can not use #alt modifier on windows. A shortcut definition like > > > > > > $g alt > > > > > > is never recognized. You have to define it > > > > > > $g command > > > > > > to make it work with as "alt+g"-keycombination (on windows). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For text navigation, the situation is a bit complicated. On Win/Linux, Ctrl+Right/Left moves the cursor between words. On Mac, Cmd+Right/Left moves the cursor at the end/beginning of line. So, using #meta for text navigation between words is not entirely accurate. We should use #ctrl instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > This would anyway mean that it would be an option to use #alt for Spotter now. But, if we are at it, would anyone be interested in working on revisiting the overall keybindings in Pharo? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 16:12 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > We can, but I remember there were some discussions and it was decided to use meta everywhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we don't change this, I'll use cmd+left cmd+right in rubric, but this is bad, because all other navigate/select+navigate shortcuts would use meta as shortcut modifier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What are the arguments for using meta for dive-in/out shortcuts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 15:08 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > During Pharo 5 most shortcuts from tools were changed to use "meta" instead of cmd. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we change this for spotter ? cmd instead of meta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ctrl left/right is often used for text components to move to next/previous word. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 13:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 07.06.2016 1:56 nachm. schrieb "Henrik Nergaard" <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IIRC the shortcut is not changed, it still is meta+right(+shift). Only the tooltip was changed to display the system specific key instead of “cmd” so for Windows/Linux this would be “ctrl”. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it changed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In #40624, for example, it was cmd (alt-key on windows ) right/shift right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pharo-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Nicolai Hess > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 12:56 PM > > > > > > > > To: Pharo Development List <[hidden email]> > > > > > > > > Subject: [Pharo-dev] GT-Spotter dive in shortcut > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ctrl+right > > > > > > > > ctrl+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know there were some discussions about this and that the behavior changed some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time ago, but I don't know the rational behind this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nicolai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > > > > > "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, > > > > > > you will end up with a messy haircut." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > > > "Quality cannot be an afterthought." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > "Being happy is a matter of choice." > > > > > > -- > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > "Every thing has its own flow." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > www.feenk.com > > > > "Don't give to get. Just give." > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." |
2016-08-07 16:23 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: Hi, twice ?
|
> On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:24 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > 2016-08-07 16:23 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > > On Aug 7, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-08-07 15:23 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > Hi, > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-08-03 10:02 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-18 23:34 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-18 20:55 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Command is an actual key on Mac next to Option(which is Alt) and Control. So, Command is a concrete key and mapping it logically to another key on another platform is mixing semantics. > > > > > > > > I propose to have two distinct layers in the image: > > > > 1. the raw layer is about having a distinct selector for each concrete key that is found on the keyboard. Right now, it seems to me that the VM does a bit of interpretation and mapping, and if it does, I think it should just provide a distinct code for each distinct key. > > > > 2. the portable layer is about having a couple of selectors (e.g., #meta, #secondaryMeta) that provide consistent mappings to the raw keys. > > > > > > > > So, in this way, #command/#control/#alt would belong to layer 1. and #meta/#secondaryMeta (we could find a better name) would belong to layer 2. > > > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > So, what does that mean for the text navigation mapping in Rubric. Which shortcut should I use? > > > > > > > > Any way to take a decision? > > > > > > > > I don't really want to wait until we implement a new layer. > > > > > > Thanks for the ping. > > > > > > I think that you cannot use now properly a uniform shortcut if we do not introduce these “layers”. I also think that we are talking about a couple of methods, so the effort is only in making the decision. I think that given that nobody disagreed, we can go ahead with it. > > > > > > For the specific question related to text navigation in Rubric, you could use #meta. > > > > > > But how? > > > If I add this to RubTextEditor class>>#buildShortcutsOn: aBuilder > > > > > > > > > (aBuilder shortcut: #nextWord) > > > category: RubTextEditor name > > > default: Character arrowRight meta > > > do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorRight: event] > > > description: 'move to next word'. > > > > > > > > > > > > (aBuilder shortcut: #previousWord) > > > category: RubTextEditor name > > > default: Character arrowLeft meta > > > do: [ :target :morph :event | target editor cursorLeft: event] > > > description: 'move to the previous word'. > > > > > > > > > we can not dive in/out in spotter. > > > > > > This is why I asked: > > > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > > > cmd+right > > > cmd+shift+right > > > to > > > ctrl+right > > > ctrl+shift+right > > > > Oh, I see now! > > > > The change was made from cmd+right to meta+right in the move of Guille to make all keybindings uniform. > > > > If a keybinding would be problematic in Spotter, we could also override the keybinding directly in the Spotter editor, I think. What do you think? > > > > what is Spotter editor? if it is the text input field, yes, but you have to overwrite it on this morph > > That is what I meant, to define the keys for diving twice, once in the spotter morph and once in the text input field. This should solve the problem, right? > > twice ? On a second thought, this is probably not needed because the focus should always be in the text input morph :). Still, we would only do that after we introduce the “layering”. Would this be Ok with you? Cheers, Doru > > Cheers, > Doru > > > right now spotter defines the shortcut on the spotter morph. This won' t work > > if rubtext components define the word-movement with the kmdispatcher. ( I already explained why). > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-17 14:35 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > Hi Nicolai, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a bit removed from the code details at the moment, and I think I need to step back a bit :). > > > > > > > > > > > > If I understand correctly, you are saying that: > > > > > > 1. defining bindings with #alt does not work on Windows. This means that we should fix this one. Using Cmd should not be a solution here. > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as I know, this is on purpose. A key pressed with windows (left) alt modified is mapped to "command" > > > > > > > > > > > > from vm source: > > > > > > > > > > > > * 3) The modifier keys are mapped as follows: > > > > > > * > > > > > > * Mac | Win32 > > > > > > * -------------------- > > > > > > * Shift -> Shift > > > > > > * Ctrl -> Ctrl > > > > > > * Command -> Left ALT > > > > > > * Option -> Right ALT > > > > > > > > > > > > (but actually, the right ALT key does not generate any keystrokes (only key down/up) and it is treated as ctrl+alt (windows right Alt key is "Alt Gr”) > > > > > > > > > > Hmm. I think we have to rethink this one because we need two layers of keys: > > > > > 1. first we should have the raw ones, and > > > > > > > > > > what are the "raw" ones? The events the OS generates or the events the VM send out to the image? > > > > > > > > > > 2. another layer that offers a more logical keys (like meta). > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain this a bit more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. defining the > > > > > > bindings for Spotter can indeed be made to override the ones in the text editor if needed. But, I think we can start thinking about using #alt. > > > > > > > > > > > > using alt+right on windows/linux and > > > > > > command + right on mac > > > > > > for dive-in or for text navigation? > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a default keycombination for word-moving in text components for mac ? > > > > > > > > > > On Mac, typically Alt+Right/Left moves between words. > > > > > > > > > > So, we would need a logical modifier that would mean: > > > > > - Mac: Alt > > > > > - Win: Ctrl > > > > > - Linux: Ctrl > > > > > > > > > > I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" > > > > > > > > > > - Mac: Command > > > > > - Win/Linux: Ctrl > > > > > > > > > > Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now better? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-16 22:45 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we are mixing the topics a bit. The #meta discussion is not specific to Spotter actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On windows, it is. Because on windows #meta is mapped to #ctrl, and you can use ctrl+left/right for moving by "words". This works in a browser, an editor, pharos text components but *not* in spotter > > > > > > > because spotter redefines this keystrokes for dive in /out. > > > > > > > Currently, both ctrl+left/right and alt+left/right (and shift for selection) are working in rubric for moving by "word". But only because the (old) shortcut (cmd/shiftcmd) action dispatcher > > > > > > > explicitly allows both. If we want to remove this and use the KMDispatcher framework only, we *need* to define only one mapping, otherwise you won't be able to use dive in/out in spotter. > > > > > > > (Or you could modify spotter to register(overwrite) the mapping on the textfield instead of the spotter morph). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea was to offer a uniform support of keybindings in Pharo, in general. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exactly, and using ctrl+left/right uniformly in editor and external tools would be great. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then Guille etal added #meta to have a predictable mapping. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and to make this work, we have to remove the old keymapping implementation (cmd/shiftcmd action map) and use the KMDispatcher registration. But I can only continue with this > > > > > > > if we have a decision what to use, (windows/linux: either ctrl+arrow or alt+arrow, mac: whatever is used on a mac for text navigation) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All #cmd places were changed to #meta, and since then we should not use explicitly #cmd anymore, except when we know we are on Mac. For a portable modifier, we should only use #meta. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At this point, both Rubric and Spotter use #meta. #meta maps on: > > > > > > > - Mac: Command > > > > > > > - Win: Control > > > > > > > - Linus: Control > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This means that #alt is now a portable modifier that will not conflict with #meta, so we can now think of using that one in combination with #meta. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can not use #alt modifier on windows. A shortcut definition like > > > > > > > $g alt > > > > > > > is never recognized. You have to define it > > > > > > > $g command > > > > > > > to make it work with as "alt+g"-keycombination (on windows). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For text navigation, the situation is a bit complicated. On Win/Linux, Ctrl+Right/Left moves the cursor between words. On Mac, Cmd+Right/Left moves the cursor at the end/beginning of line. So, using #meta for text navigation between words is not entirely accurate. We should use #ctrl instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would anyway mean that it would be an option to use #alt for Spotter now. But, if we are at it, would anyone be interested in working on revisiting the overall keybindings in Pharo? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Doru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 16:12 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > We can, but I remember there were some discussions and it was decided to use meta everywhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we don't change this, I'll use cmd+left cmd+right in rubric, but this is bad, because all other navigate/select+navigate shortcuts would use meta as shortcut modifier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What are the arguments for using meta for dive-in/out shortcuts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 15:08 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > During Pharo 5 most shortcuts from tools were changed to use "meta" instead of cmd. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we change this for spotter ? cmd instead of meta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ctrl left/right is often used for text components to move to next/previous word. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 13:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 07.06.2016 1:56 nachm. schrieb "Henrik Nergaard" <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IIRC the shortcut is not changed, it still is meta+right(+shift). Only the tooltip was changed to display the system specific key instead of “cmd” so for Windows/Linux this would be “ctrl”. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it changed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In #40624, for example, it was cmd (alt-key on windows ) right/shift right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pharo-dev [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Nicolai Hess > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 12:56 PM > > > > > > > > > To: Pharo Development List <[hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Pharo-dev] GT-Spotter dive in shortcut > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why did the shortcut for dive-in element/category changed from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cmd+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ctrl+right > > > > > > > > > ctrl+shift+right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know there were some discussions about this and that the behavior changed some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time ago, but I don't know the rational behind this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nicolai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "If you interrupt the barber while he is cutting your hair, > > > > > > > you will end up with a messy haircut." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > > > > > "Quality cannot be an afterthought." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > > > "Being happy is a matter of choice." > > > > > > > > -- > > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > > > "Every thing has its own flow." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > www.feenk.com > > > > > > "Don't give to get. Just give." > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > www.feenk.com > > > > "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "It's not how it is, it is how we see it." |
In reply to this post by Guillermo Polito
Le 7/6/16 à 16:33, Guille Polito a écrit : > For coherence, the vast majority of shortcuts should follow the > standard in all applications. Most shortcuts use cmd in mac, and ctrl > in unix/win. > > Then there are exceptions of course. I'd like exceptions to be that, > exceptions, and well documented. I'm not against using #alt for > particular cases (for example, it is often used in windows/linux for > menu navigation). > > Also, I'd like shortcuts that are meant to be used with #alt to use > #alt and not #command. Because #command means the windows key in windows. > > That said, If the problem are shortcut conflicts, I think it would be > nice at some moment to make a step back, look at the big picture and > design shortcuts for the entire system instead of patching place over > place :). and I would love to have cmd k cmd e end of line and others from emacs (of course in my own shortcut bindings preferences :) > > Guille > -------- Original Message -------- >> >> >> 2016-06-07 16:12 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >> >> We can, but I remember there were some discussions and it was >> decided to use meta everywhere. >> >> >> >> but using meta everywhere does not help if there are conflicts with >> other shortcuts. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Andrei >> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nicolai Hess >> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> 2016-06-07 15:08 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis >> <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >> >> During Pharo 5 most shortcuts from tools were changed to >> use "meta" instead of cmd. >> >> Cheers, >> Andrei >> >> >> Can we change this for spotter ? cmd instead of meta >> >> ctrl left/right is often used for text components to move to >> next/previous word. >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Nicolai Hess >> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> 2016-06-07 13:57 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess >> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >> >> >> Am 07.06.2016 1:56 nachm. schrieb "Henrik >> Nergaard" <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>>: >> > >> > IIRC the shortcut is not changed, it still is >> meta+right(+shift). Only the tooltip was changed >> to display the system specific key instead of >> “cmd” so for Windows/Linux this would be “ctrl”. >> >> No, it changed >> >> In #40624, for example, it was cmd (alt-key on windows >> ) right/shift right >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Henrik >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Pharo-dev >> [mailto:[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>] On >> Behalf Of Nicolai Hess >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 12:56 PM >> > To: Pharo Development List >> <[hidden email] >> <mailto:[hidden email]>> >> > Subject: [Pharo-dev] GT-Spotter dive in shortcut >> > >> > >> > >> > Why did the shortcut for dive-in >> element/category changed from >> > >> > cmd+right >> > >> > cmd+shift+right >> > >> > to >> > >> > ctrl+right >> > ctrl+shift+right >> > >> > I know there were some discussions about this >> and that the behavior changed some >> > >> > time ago, but I don't know the rational behind >> this. >> > >> > thanks >> > >> > nicolai >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
Le 16/6/16 à 22:45, Tudor Girba a écrit : > Hi, > > I think we are mixing the topics a bit. The #meta discussion is not specific to Spotter actions. > > The idea was to offer a uniform support of keybindings in Pharo, in general. Then Guille etal added #meta to have a predictable mapping. All #cmd places were changed to #meta, and since then we should not use explicitly #cmd anymore, except when we know we are on Mac. For a portable modifier, we should only use #meta. > > At this point, both Rubric and Spotter use #meta. #meta maps on: > - Mac: Command > - Win: Control > - Linus: Control > > This means that #alt is now a portable modifier that will not conflict with #meta, so we can now think of using that one in combination with #meta. > > For text navigation, the situation is a bit complicated. On Win/Linux, Ctrl+Right/Left moves the cursor between words. On Mac, Cmd+Right/Left moves the cursor at the end/beginning of line. So, using #meta for text navigation between words is not entirely accurate. We should use #ctrl instead. > > This would anyway mean that it would be an option to use #alt for Spotter now. But, if we are at it, would anyone be interested in working on revisiting the overall keybindings in Pharo? > I would really like to have an agreement on nautilus and non nautilus - implementors - senders - references Now this is not easy. In addition, having on implementors falling back on class browse and the inverse too is really nice to have like that we do not have to think "ok this piece of text represent a class so that I should browse)" or "this piece of text is a method so I have to ask implementor (browse should bring implementor) we could also get back on binding. We could do the same for senders/references (that are the same concept). I already fixed that and it was lost two times. Stef |
In reply to this post by Ben Coman
i,
>> Command is an actual key on Mac next to Option(which is Alt) and Control. So, Command is a concrete key and mapping it logically to another key on another platform is mixing semantics. > +1000. We should avoid our abstract shortcut key modifiers overlaping > concrete keys. yes it seems like a good idea. > I propose to have two distinct layers in the image: > 1. the raw layer is about having a distinct selector for each concrete key that is found on the keyboard. Right now, it seems to me that the VM does a bit of interpretation and mapping, and if it does, I think it should just provide a distinct code for each distinct key. > 2. the portable layer is about having a couple of selectors (e.g., #meta, #secondaryMeta) that provide consistent mappings to the raw keys. > Sounds good. what is secondaryMeta? |
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
2016-08-07 19:58 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[hidden email]>:
Oh well .... Please take a look at the current implementation of event handling, just 10 minutes or so. how we use different (shortcut) event registration shortcut handling event handling some are defined in code, some shortcuts handled by the editor , some by the morph some shortcuts are defined on the morph that gets the events, some are defined on other morphs. some event (shortcuts spotters dive in / dive out) only works *because* we have the two shortcut handlers (handleKeystroke: / dispatchKeystroke:) and tell me that it is a good idea to just start introducing something new I really think we should clean up what we have now or at least finish the move to the kmdispatcher event handling.
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
>> On Jun 17, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Henrik Johansen <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> #alt_meta ? >> - Maps to alt on OSX, ctrl on Win/Linux. >> - Can only bind either #meta or #alt_meta + key, or both must bind to same action. >> - Can only be applied to a very limited set of keys, (usually those employed in navigation). >> (here are *alot* of different keyboard layouts on Mac using alt + key to generate crucial characters, allowing alt + key as shortcut in general is bound to end in disaster sooner or later) > Thanks for the input! > > Indeed, using Alt for Mac for anything else than text is not so nice. However, on Mac we could use Ctrl. To this end, we could introduce a secondaryMeta that maps like this: > - Mac: Ctrl > - Win: Alt > - Linux: Alt > > What do you think? Would be ok but why do we need secondary meta? Stef |
Hi,
> On Aug 7, 2016, at 9:16 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>> On Jun 17, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Henrik Johansen <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> #alt_meta ? >>> - Maps to alt on OSX, ctrl on Win/Linux. >>> - Can only bind either #meta or #alt_meta + key, or both must bind to same action. >>> - Can only be applied to a very limited set of keys, (usually those employed in navigation). >>> (here are *alot* of different keyboard layouts on Mac using alt + key to generate crucial characters, allowing alt + key as shortcut in general is bound to end in disaster sooner or later) >> Thanks for the input! >> >> Indeed, using Alt for Mac for anything else than text is not so nice. However, on Mac we could use Ctrl. To this end, we could introduce a secondaryMeta that maps like this: >> - Mac: Ctrl >> - Win: Alt >> - Linux: Alt >> >> What do you think? > > Would be ok but why do we need secondary meta? Having only one platform-independent modifier would likely not be enough to handle all key combinations we would want. I think that if we would have a second platform-independent modifier would not hurt. Cheers, Doru > Stef > > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Obvious things are difficult to teach." |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |